Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of Second Language Proficiency and Syntactic Structure Similarities on the Sensitivity and Processing of English Passive Sentence in Late Chinese-English Bilinguists: An ERP Study

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the influence of L2 proficiency and syntactic similarity on English passive sentence processing, the present ERP study asked 40 late Chinese-English bilinguals (27 females and 13 males, mean age = 23.88) with high or intermediate L2 proficiency to read the sentences carefully and to indicate for each sentence whether or not it was correct. Sentences were classified into literal translation sentences with the similar structure between the two languages and free translation sentences with the different structure. Behavioral data showed: shorter reaction times and higher accuracy rates occurred in the high-proficient group than those in the intermediate-proficient group; shorter reaction times and higher accuracy rates were observed in literal translation sentences than those in free translation sentences. ERP results showed literal translation sentences elicited an enhanced P200 and P600 while free translation sentences elicited a larger N400. The high-proficient group showed a larger P600 in syntactic violations and double violations while the intermediate-proficient group evoked an enhanced N400 in semantic violations and double violations. Literal translation sentences caused a larger P200 while free translation sentences elicited more negative-going N400. Behavioral and ERP data revealed the influence of L2 proficiency and syntactic similarity on L2 sentence processing, and L2 proficiency played a predominate role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shuman, H., & Boland, J. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardal, S., Donald, M. W., Meuter, R., et al. (1990). Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 39(2), 187–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Shu, H., Zhao, L. J., et al. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguist, 27(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(6), 653–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008). Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologia, 128(3), 501–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 45–63.

  • Friederici, A. D., et al. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic processing: Early and late event-related potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219–1248.

  • Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (1999). Brain responses during sentence reading: Visual input affects central processes. NeuroReport, 10, 3175–3178.

  • Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second language processing? Evident from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A., Mueller, J. L., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 121–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second language research, 22(3), 369–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 244(2), 61–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S. A., Holcomb, P. J., & Osterhout, L. (2008). ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in early bilinguals and monolinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 514–527.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Kluender, R. (1994). What is who violating? A reconsideration of linguistic violations in light of event-related brain potentials. In H. J. Heinze, T. F. Münte, & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), Cognitive electrophysiology: Basic and clinical applications. Boston: Birkhäuser.

  • Li, R. B., Peng, D.-L., & Guo, T.-M. (2003). A study on Chinese and English semantic access with ERP technology. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(3), 309–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(3), 395–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münte, T. F., Heinze, H., & Magnum, G. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Natalie, A. P., Denise, K., Mercier, J., et al. (2006). ERP measures of auditory word repetition and translation priming in bilinguals. Brain Research, 1125(1), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, H. J., Nicol, J., Barss, A., Forster, K., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1212–1228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language, 59(3), 494–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 2, 785–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 786–803.

  • Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W.-G. (2004). Comparative guidelines of Chinese and English. Beijing: Beijing Language University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perani, D., Paulesu, E., Sebastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Dehaene, S., & Bettinardi, V. (1998). The bilingual brain: Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, 121(10), 1841–1852.

  • Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., & Meyer, A. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62(2), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösler, F. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence form event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030–2048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabourin, L. D., & Stowe, L. A. (2008). Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24(3), 397–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing: II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(3), 214–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., Cornell, & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1), 13–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and Explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Across languages, space, and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(1), 91–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanBerkum, J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (2001). Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open and closed class words: An ERP study of bilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1338–1353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (2006). Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing. Bilinguialism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, X.-L., & Wang, Z.-J. (2003). The cognitive interpretation of passive sentences. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 35(3), 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylinen, S., Shestakova, A., Alku, P., & Huotilainen, M. (2005). The perception of phonological quantity based on durational cues by native speakers, second-language users and non speakers of Finnish. Language and Speech, 48(3), 313–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Youth project of China national natural science fund “the Moderating mechanism of Late Chinese-English Second Language Learners’ Syntactic Processing: behavior and ERP research” (31300928).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 800, Dongchuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Xin Chang

  2. Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, 100, Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200234, China

    Pei Wang

Authors
  1. Xin Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, X., Wang, P. Influence of Second Language Proficiency and Syntactic Structure Similarities on the Sensitivity and Processing of English Passive Sentence in Late Chinese-English Bilinguists: An ERP Study. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 85–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9319-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9319-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation