The Separability of Morphological Processes from Semantic Meaning and Syntactic Class in Production of Single Words: Evidence from the Hebrew Root Morpheme
- 250 Downloads
In the present study we investigated to what extent the morphological facilitation effect induced by the derivational root morpheme in Hebrew is independent of semantic meaning and grammatical information of the part of speech involved. Using the picture–word interference paradigm with auditorily presented distractors, Experiment 1 compared the facilitation effect induced by semantically transparent versus semantically opaque morphologically related distractor words (i.e., a shared root) on the production latency of bare nouns. The results revealed almost the same amount of facilitation for both relatedness conditions. These findings accord with the results of the few studies that have addressed this issue in production in Indo-European languages, as well as previous studies in written word perception in Hebrew. Experiment 2 compared the root’s facilitation effect, induced by morphologically related nominal versus verbal distractors, on the production latency of bare nouns. The results revealed a facilitation effect of similar size induced by the shared root, regardless of the distractor’s part of speech. It is suggested that the principle that governs lexical organization at the level of morphology, at least for Hebrew roots, is form-driven and independent of semantic meaning. This principle of organization crosses the linguistic domains of production and written word perception, as well as grammatical organization according to part of speech.
KeywordsMorphology and production Picture–word-interference paradigm (PWI) Morphological processes in producing Hebrew words Syntactic class in production
This research was supported by a grant from the Israeli Science Foundation (#179/09) to Avital Deutsch. I thank Roni Pener-Tessler, Tamar Malinovitch, Dana Zahar and Yaara Lador for their extensive help in constructing the materials and excellent assistance in running the experiments.
- Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Burani, C., & Laudana, A. (1992). Units of representation of derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in Psychology: Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 27–44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2003). Lexical organization and lexical access in a non-concatenated morphology: Mapping the mental lexicon. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of semitic, root based, morphology (pp. 165–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Fias, W. (1995). Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 961–980.Google Scholar
- Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2011a). Sharing morphemes without sharing meaning: Production and comprehension of German verbs in the context of morphological relatives. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 173–191.Google Scholar
- Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., Böhl, A., & Bölte, J. (2011b). Evidence for morphological composition at the form level in speech production. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2011(23), 818–836.Google Scholar
- Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semnatic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 503–535.Google Scholar
- Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture-naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896–918.Google Scholar
- Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2013). The flexibility of letter position flexibility: Evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 39, 1143–1152.Google Scholar