Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 289–297 | Cite as

Working Memory Capacity and Self-Repair Behavior in First and Second Language Oral Production

  • Ahmad Mojavezi
  • Mohammad Javad Ahmadian


This study explores the relationship between working memory capacity and self-repair behavior in first (L1) and second language (L2) oral production. 40 Iranian intermediate EFL learners participated in this study. Their working memory capacity was measured via a version of listening span test. The participants performed two oral narrative tasks, one in their L2 (English) and one in their L1 (Farsi). Then, they were asked to listen to their own narrations and comment on the repairs they made in their speech. Self-repairs were analyzed and categorized taking into account the participants’ stimulated recall comments. Results of the analyses pointed to positive correlations between the participants’ working memory capacity and self-repairs in the L2 but not in the L1. Also, results revealed that whereas in the case of L1, the participants effectuated different-information and appropriacy repairs more than error-repairs, in the case of L2 more error-repairs were made.


First language Second language Self-repair behavior Working memory capacity 



This research was funded by Islamic Azad University, Zahedan Branch.


  1. Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 329–350.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadian, M. J., Abdolrezapour, P., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Task difficulty and self-repair behavior in second language oral production. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and oral L2 performance under task-based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmadian, M. J. (in press). Working memory capacity, online planning, and self-repair behavior. In Z. Wen, M. Mota & A. MacNeil (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theory, research and commentary. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmadian, M.J. & Tavakoli, M. (in press). Investigating what second language learners do and monitor under careful online planning condition. Canadian Modern Language Review.Google Scholar
  6. Allan, D. (1992). Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In: G. H. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. VIII). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.Google Scholar
  12. Guara’-Tavares, M. G. (2008). Pre-task Planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil: Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar
  13. Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. (2006). Effects of time pressure on verbal self-monitoring: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1125, 104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.096.Google Scholar
  14. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. W. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language teaching: Reviews and studies. Language Teaching, 42(2), 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huitt, W. (2003). The information processing approach.
  16. Kormos, J. (1998). Self-repairs in the speech of Hungarian learners of English. Eotvos University, Budapest: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  17. Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kormos, J. (2000). The timing of self-repairs in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 33, 41–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency and speed-accuracytrade-off in skilled behaviour. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.Google Scholar
  24. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., & Fujii, A. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In: P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring and self-repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(163), 184.Google Scholar
  26. Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R.W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 211–227.Google Scholar
  28. Towse, J. N., & Jarrold, C. (2006). Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.002.Google Scholar
  29. Van Hest, E. (1996). Self-repair in L1 and L2 production. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishIslamic Azad UniversityZahedanIran
  2. 2.Department of English, Faculty of foreign LanguagesUniversity of IsfahanIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations