Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 21–35 | Cite as

Comparing Nouns and Verbs in a Lexical Task

  • Françoise Cordier
  • Jean-Claude Croizet
  • François Rigalleau


We analyzed the differential processing of nouns and verbs in a lexical decision task. Moderate and high-frequency nouns and verbs were compared. The characteristics of our material were specified at the formal level (number of letters and syllables, number of homographs, orthographic neighbors, frequency and age of acquisition), and at the semantic level (imagery, number and strength of associations, number of meanings, context dependency). A regression analysis indicated a classical frequency effect and a word-type effect, with latencies for verbs being slower than for nouns. The regression analysis did not permit the conclusion that semantic effects were involved (particularly imageability). Nevertheless, the semantic opposition between nouns as prototypical representations of objects, and verbs as prototypical representation of actions was not tested in this experiment and remains a good candidate explanation of the response time discrepancies between verbs and nouns.


Noun and verb processing Frequency LDT Semantic variables 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker M. C. (2003) Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balota D. A. (1994) Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In: Gernsbacher M. A. (eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 303–358Google Scholar
  3. Balota D. A., Chumbley J. I. (1984) Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10: 340–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balota D. A., Ferraro F. R., Connor L. T. (1991) On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In: Schwanenflugel P. J. (eds) The psychology of word meaning. L.E. Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, pp 187–222Google Scholar
  5. Balota D. A., Cortese M. J., Sergent-Marshall S. D., Spieler D. H., Yap M. J. (2004) Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133: 283–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barsalou L. W. (1982) Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition 10: 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassano D. (2000) Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 25: 493–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates E., Marchman V. A., Thal D., Fenson L., Dale P., Reznick J. S., Reilly J., Hartung J. (1994) Developmental and stylistic variations in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21: 85–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Besner D., Joordens S. (1995) Wrestling with ambiguity—further reflections: Reply to Masson and Borowsky (1995) and Rueckl (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21: 515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borowsky R., Masson M. E. J. (1996) Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22: 63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown T. L., Carr T. H., Chaderjian M. (1987) Orthography, familiarity, and meaningfulness reconsidered: Attentional strategies may affect the lexical sensitivity of visual code formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, C. S. (2007). Towards a cognitive-functional model of text comprehension. In C. Butler, R. H. Downing, & J. Lavid (Eds.), Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse. Studies in language companion series (Vol. 85, pp. 41–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. Careirras M., Perea M., Grainger J. (1997) Orthographic neighborhood effects on visual word recognition in Spanish: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23: 857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiarello C., Liu S., Shears C., Kacinik N. (2002) Differential asymmetries for recognizing nouns and verbs: Where are they?. Neuropsychology 16: 35–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chumbley J. I., Balota D. A. (1984) A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition 12: 590–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark J. M., Paivio A. (2004) Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36(3): 371–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen J. (1983) The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement 7: 249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connine C. M., Mullennix J., Shernoff E., Yelen J. (1990) Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16: 1084–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cordier F., Le Ny J.-F. (2005) Evidence of several components for word familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 37(3): 528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Declercq C., Le Ny J.-F. (2008) Verb-patient co-occurrences in Internet texts and verb manning in memory. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 630–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Groot A. M. B. (1989) Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15: 824–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dowty D. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619Google Scholar
  23. Druks J. (2002) Verbs and nouns. A review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15: 289–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Federmeier K. D., Segal J. B., Lombrozo T., Kutas M. (2000) Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain 123: 2552–2566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferretti T. R., McRae K., Hatherell A. (2001) Integrating verbs, situations schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 516–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gennari S., Poeppel D. (2003) Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition 89: B27–B41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gernsbacher M. A. (1984) Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(2): 256–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilhooly K. J., Logie R. H. (1980) Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research, Methods & Instrumentation 12: 395–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grainger J., Jacobs A. M. (1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 103: 518–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grainger J., O’Regan J. K., Jacobs A. M., Segui J. (1989) On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighbourhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics 45: 189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grainger J., Segui J. (1990) Neighborhood frequency effects, in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked-identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics 47: 191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hino Y., Lupker S. J. (1996) Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22: 1331–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hino Y., Lupker S. J., Pexman P. M. (2002) Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 28: 686–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jastrzembski J. E. (1981) Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology 13: 278–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson N. F., Pugh K. R. (1994) A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 26: 240–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Joordens S., Besner D. (1994) When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20: 1051–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kauschke C., Stenneken P. (2008) Differences in noun and verb processing in lexical decision cannot be attributed to word form and morphological complexity alone. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 37: 443–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kawamoto A. H., Farrar W. T., Kello C. T. (1994) When two meanings are better than one: Modeling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 601–609Google Scholar
  39. Kemmerer D., Eggleston A. (2010) Nouns and verbs in the brain: Implications of linguistic typology for cognitive neuroscience. Lingua 120: 2686–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Longe O., Randall B., Stamatakis E. A., Tyler L. K. (2007) Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1812–1820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marslen-Wilson W. D., Bozic M., Randall B. (2008) Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes 23: 394–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Masson M. E. J., Borowsky R. (1995) Unsettling questions about semantic ambiguity in connectionist models: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21: 509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McClelland J. L., Rumelhart D. E. (1981) An interactive activation model of context effect in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic finding. Psychological Review 88: 375–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McRae K., Feretti T. R., Amyote L. (1997) Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 137–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McRae K., Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Tanenhaus M. K. (1998) Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and others constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 283–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millis M. L., Button S. B. (1989) The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t. Memory and Cognition 17: 141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Monsell S., Doyle M. C., Haggard P. N. (1989) Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 42–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morrisson C. M., Ellis A. E. (1995) Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology 21: 116–133Google Scholar
  49. Morrisson C. M., Ellis A. E. (2000) Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology 91: 167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morton J. (1969) Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76: 165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. New B., Pallier C., Brysbaert M., Ferrand L. (2004) Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36: 516–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pecher D. (2001) Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8(3): 545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perani D., Cappa S., Schnur T., Tettamanti M., Collina S., Della Rosa M., Fazio F. (1999) The neural correlates of verb and noun processing—A PET study. Brain 122: 2337–2344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perea M., Pollatsek A. (1998) The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 767–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plaut D. C. (1997) Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 765–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Preston K. A. (1935) The speed of word perception and its relation to reading ability. Journal of General Psychology 13: 199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prinzmetal W., Treiman R., Rho S. H. (1986) How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language 25: 461–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reyna V.F. (1987) Understanding verbs: Easy extension, hard comprehension. In: Ellis E. W. (eds) Progress in the psychology of language. Erlbaum, London, pp 301–316Google Scholar
  59. Rösler F., Streb J., Haan H. (2001) Event-related brain potentials evoked by verbs and nouns in a primed lexical decision task. Psychophysiology 38: 694–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rueckl J. G. (1995) Ambiguity and connectionist networks: Still settling into a solution—Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21: 501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmauder A. R., Egan M. C. (1998) The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing. Memory and Cognition 26(6): 1304–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwanenflugel P. J., Shoben E. J. (1983) Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9: 82–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwanenflugel P. J., Harnishfeger K. K., Stowe R. W. (1988) Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 499–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Segui J., Grainger J. (1990) Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: The effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance 16: 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sereno J. A. (1999) Hemispheric differences in grammatical class. Brain and Language 70: 13–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shapiro K., Caramazza A. (2003) The representation of grammatical categories in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Siri S., Tettamanti M., Cappa S. F., Della Rosa P., Saccuman C., Scifo P., Vigliocco G. (2008) The neural substrate of naming events: Effects of processing demands but not grammatical class. Cerebral Cortex 18: 171–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Spoehr K. T., Smith E. E. (1973) The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology 5: 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stone G. O., Van Orden G. C. (1994) Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1248–1268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tabossi P., Spivey-Knowlton M., McRae K., Tanenhaus M. K. (1993) Semantics effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. In: Umilta C., Moscovitch M. (eds) Attention & performance XV. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  71. Tesnière L. (1959) Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck, ParisGoogle Scholar
  72. Trueswell J. C., Tanenhaus M. K., Garnsey S. M. (1994) Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 285–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tyler L., Russel R., Fadili J., Moss H. E. (2001) The neural representations of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain 124: 1619–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Orden G. C., Bosman A. M. T., Goldinger S. D., Farrar W. T. (1997) A recurrent network account of reading, spelling and dyslexia. In: Donahoe J. W., Dorsel V. P. (eds) Neural network models of cognition: Biobehavioral foundations. Elsevier Sciences Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Orden G. C., Goldinger S. D. (1994) lndependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1269–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioral, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 3, 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vigliocco G., Warren J., Siri S., Arcuili J., Scott S., Wise R. (2006) The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cerebral Cortex 16: 1790–1796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Waters G. S., Seidenberg M. S. (1985) Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition 13: 557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. West S. G., Aiken L. S., Krull J. L. (1996) Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality 64: 1–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wolff P. (2003) Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. Cognition 88: 1–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Françoise Cordier
    • 1
  • Jean-Claude Croizet
    • 1
  • François Rigalleau
    • 1
  1. 1.CeRCA, UMR CNRS 6234PoitiersFrance

Personalised recommendations