Lexical and Prosodic Effects on Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Aphasia
- 365 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to determine whether and when individuals with aphasia and healthy controls use lexical and prosodic information during on-line sentence comprehension. Individuals with aphasia and controls (n = 12 per group) participated in a self-paced listening experiment. The stimuli were early closure sentences, such as “While the parents watched(,) the child sang a song.” Both lexical and prosodic cues were manipulated. The cues were biased toward the subject- or object- of the ambiguous noun phrase (the child). Thus, there were two congruous conditions (in which both lexical cues and prosodic cues were consistent) and two incongruous conditions (in which lexical and prosodic cues conflicted). The results showed that the people with aphasia had longer listening times for the ambiguous noun phrase (the child) when the cues were conflicting, rather than consistent. The controls showed effects earlier in the sentence, at the subordinate verb (watched or danced). Both groups showed evidence of reanalysis at the main verb (sang). These effects demonstrate that the aphasic group was sensitive to the lexical and prosodic cues, but used them on a delayed time course relative to the control group.
KeywordsSyntactic ambiguity resolution Aphasia On-line sentence processing Prosody
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blodgett, A. (2004). The interaction of prosodic phrasing, verb bias, and plausibility during spoken sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 4.6.12) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
- Caplan, D., DeDe, G., Waters, G., & Michaud, J. Effects of domain-general and domain-specific cognitive abilities on age-related changed in comprehension of sentences with relative clauses (submitted).Google Scholar
- DeDe, G. (2008). Lexical, pragmatic, and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in younger, older, and aphasic adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
- Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2001). The frequency of major sentence types over discourse levels: A corpus analysis (Vol. 13, no. 1). Department of Cognitive Science, UCSD.Google Scholar
- Dunn L. M., Dunn L. M. (1997) Peabody picture vocabulary task (3rd ed.). American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MNGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira F., Henderson J. M., Anes M. D., Weeks P. A. Jr., McFarlane D. K. (1996b) Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving windows technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frazier L., Clifton C. (1996) Construal. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Goodglass H., Kaplan E., Barresi B. (2000) Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (3rd ed.). Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan E., Goodglass H., Weintraub S. (2001) Boston naming test. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Marslen-Wilson W. D., Tyler L. K., Warren P., Grenier P., Lee C. S. (1992) Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45A: 73–87Google Scholar
- Mitchell D. C. (1987) Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In: Coltheart M. (eds) Attention and performance XII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 601–618Google Scholar
- Schepman, A. H. B. C. (1997). Prosody and on-line parsing. D.Phil Thesis, University of Sussex. Downloading available from: http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~astrid/thesisdownload.html.
- Tabachnick B., Fidell L. (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon, USAGoogle Scholar
- Trueswell J., Tanenhaus M. K. (1994) Towards a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Clifton C., Frazier L., Rayner K. (eds) Perspectives in sentence processing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 155–180Google Scholar
- Waters G. S., Caplan D. (2004) Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: Evidence from self-paced listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 57A: 129–163Google Scholar