Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 195–214 | Cite as

On the Nature of Semantic Constraints on Lexical Access

  • Andrea Weber
  • Matthew W. Crocker
Article

Abstract

We present two eye-tracking experiments that investigate lexical frequency and semantic context constraints in spoken-word recognition in German. In both experiments, the pivotal words were pairs of nouns overlapping at onset but varying in lexical frequency. In Experiment 1, German listeners showed an expected frequency bias towards high-frequency competitors (e.g., Blume, ‘flower’) when instructed to click on low-frequency targets (e.g., Bluse, ‘blouse’). In Experiment 2, semantically constraining context increased the availability of appropriate low-frequency target words prior to word onset, but did not influence the availability of semantically inappropriate high-frequency competitors at the same time. Immediately after target word onset, however, the activation of high-frequency competitors was reduced in semantically constraining sentences, but still exceeded that of unrelated distractor words significantly. The results suggest that (1) semantic context acts to downgrade activation of inappropriate competitors rather than to exclude them from competition, and (2) semantic context influences spoken-word recognition, over and above anticipation of upcoming referents.

Keywords

Spoken-word recognition Semantic constraints Eye-tracking German 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allopenna P., Magnuson J., Tanenhaus M. (1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 419–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann G., Kamide Y. (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73: 247–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann G., Kamide Y. (2007) The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 502–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  5. Barr D. J. (2008) Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition 109: 18–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blutner R., Sommer R. (1988) Sentence processing and lexical access: The influence of the focus-identifying task. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonin P., Barry C., Meot A., Chalard M. (2004) The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story?. Journal of Memory and Language 50: 456–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connine C., Blasko D., Wang J. (1994) Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connine C., Mullennix J., Shernoff E., Yelen J. (1990) Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 1084–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connine C., Titone D., Wang J. (1993) Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19: 81–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper R. (1974) The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. Cognitive Psychology 6: 84–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahan D., Gaskell M. (2007) The temporal dynamics of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 483–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahan D., Magnuson J., Tanenhaus M. (2001) Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 42: 317–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahan D., Swingley D., Tanenhaus M. K., Magnuson J. S. (2000) Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M. (2004) Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30: 498–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duffy S. A., Morris R. K., Rayner K. (1988) Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dupoux E., Mehler J. (1990) Monitoring the lexicon with normal and compressed speech: Frequency effects and the prelexical code. Journal of Memory and Language 29: 316–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberhard K., Spivey-Knowlton S., Sedivy J., Tanenhaus M. (1995) Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language processing in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 409–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiebach C. J., Friederici A. D., Müller K., von Cramon D. Y., Hernandez A. E. (2003) Distinct brain responses for early and late learned words. Neuroimage 19: 1627–1637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaskell M., Marslen-Wilson W. (1997) Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 613–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaskell M., Marslen-Wilson W. (2002) Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology 45: 220–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallet P. (1986) Eye movements. In: Boff K., Kaufman L., Thomas J. (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance. Wiley, New York, pp 10-1–10-112Google Scholar
  23. Huettig F., Altmann G. (2004) The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eye-tracking. In: Carreiras M., Clifton C. (eds) The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond. Psychology Press, New York, NY, pp 187–207Google Scholar
  24. Huettig F., Altmann G. (2007) Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition 15: 985–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huettig F., McQueen J. (2007) The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 460–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kambe G., Rayner K., Duffy S. A. (2001) Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Memory & Cognition 29: 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamide Y., Altmann G., Haywood S. (2003) The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucas M. (1987) Frequency effects on the processing of ambiguous words in sentence contexts. Language and Speech 30: 25–46Google Scholar
  29. Luce P., Goldinger S., Auer E., Vitevitch M. (2000) Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics 62: 615–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luce P., Pisoni D. (1998) Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19: 1–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marslen-Wilson W. (1989) Access and integration: Projecting sounds onto meaning. In: Marslen-Wilson W. (eds) Lexical representation and process. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  32. Marslen-Wilson W. (1990) Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: Altmann G. T. M. (eds) Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 148–172Google Scholar
  33. Massaro D. (1996) Integration of multiple sources of information in language processing. In: Inui T., McClelland J. (eds) Attention and performance XVI. Information integration in perception and communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 397–432Google Scholar
  34. Matin E., Shao K., Boff K. (1993) Saccadic overhead: Information processing time with and without saccades. Perceptual Psychophysics 53: 372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McClelland J., Elman J. (1986) The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 10: 1–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McQueen J. M. (1993) Rhyme decisions to spoken words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition 21: 210–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller J., Eimas P. (1995) Speech perception: From signal to word. Annual Review of Psychology 46: 467–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moss H., Marslen-Wilson W. (1993) Access to word meanings during spoken language comprehension: Effects of sentential semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 19: 1254–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norris D., Cutler A., McQueen J., Butterfield S. (2006) Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 523: 146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norris D., McQueen J. (2008) Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review 115: 357–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oden G., Spira J. (1983) Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Onifer W., Swinney D. (1981) Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory & Cognition 9: 225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schulte im Walde S. (2008) Human associations and the choice of features for semantic verb classification. Research on Language and Computation 6: 79–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seidenberg M., Tanenhaus M., Leiman J., Bienkowski M. (1982) Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14: 489–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sereno S. C., Pacht J. M., Rayner K. (1992) Effect of meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words. Psychological Science 3: 296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simpson G. (1981) Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 120–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swinney D. (1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tabossi P. (1988) Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of unambiguous nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tabossi P., Colombo L., Job R. (1987) Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research 49: 161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabossi P., Zardon F. (1993) Processing ambiguous words in context. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tanenhaus M., Donenwerth-Nolan S. (1984) Syntactic context and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36: 649–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tanenhaus M., Leiman J., Seidenberg M. (1979) Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vitevitch M. (2002) Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28: 270–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vitevitch M., Luce P. (1998) When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science 9: 325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitevitch M., Luce P. (1999) Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 374–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weber A., Cutler A. (2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 50: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weber, A., Melinger, A. (2008). Name dominance in spoken word recognition is (not) modulated by expectations: evidence from synonyms. In Proceedings of the international speech communication association workshop: Experimental linguistics (pp. 205–208). Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  58. Whitney P., McKay T., Kellas G., Emerson W. (1985) Semantic activation of noun concepts in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 126–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zwitserlood P. (1989) The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32: 25–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zwitserlood P., Schriefers H. (1995) Effects of sensory information and processing time in spoken-word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Saarland UniversitySaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations