Abstract
Statistical segmentation of continuous speech, i.e., the ability to utilise transitional probabilities between syllables in order to detect word boundaries, is reflected in the brain’s auditory event-related potentials (ERPs). The N1 and N400 ERP components are typically enhanced for word onsets compared to random syllables during active listening. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to record event-related fields (ERFs) simultaneously with ERPs to syllables in a continuous sequence consisting of ten repeating tri-syllabic pseudowords and unexpected syllables presented between these pseudowords. We found the responses to differ between the syllables within the pseudowords and between the expected and unexpected syllables, reflecting an implicit process extracting the statistical characteristics of the sequence and monitoring for unexpected syllables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abla D., Katahira K., Okanoya K. (2008) On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 952–964
Aslin R. N., Saffran J. R., Newport E. L. (1998) Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 9: 321–324
Chwilla D. J., Brown C. M., Hagoort P. (1995) The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology 32: 274–285
Cunillera T., Toro J. M., Sebastián-Gallés N., Rodríguez-Fornells A. (2006) The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research 1123: 168–178
Davis M. H., Marslen-Wilson W. D. (2002) Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28: 218–244
Hagoort P., Wassenaar M., Brown C. M. (2003) Syntax-related ERP effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research 16: 38–50
Hinojosa J. A., Moreno E. M., Casado P., Muñoz F., Pozo M. A. (2005) Syntactic expectancy: An event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters 378: 34–39
Kutas M., Federmeier K. D. (2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 463–470
Kutas M., Hillyard S. A. (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307: 161–163
Saffran J. R., Aslin R. N., Newport E. L. (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926–1928
Saffran J. R., Newport E. L., Aslin R. N., Tunick R. A., Barrueco S. (1997) Incidental language learning: Listening and learning out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science 8: 101–105
Sanders L. D., Neville H. J. (2003) An ERP study of continuous speech processing I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research 15: 228–240
Sanders L. D., Newport E. L., Neville H. J. (2002) Segmenting nonsense: An event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience 5: 700–703
Service E., Helenius P., Maury S., Salmelin R. (2007) Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1193–1205
Tervaniemi M., Kujala A., Alho K., Virtanen J., Ilmoniemi R. J., Nä ätänen R. (1999) Functional specialization of the human auditory cortex in processing phonetic and musical sounds: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. NeuroImage 9: 330–336
Toro J. M., Sinnett S., Soto-Faraco S. (2005) Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition 97: B25–B34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teinonen, T., Huotilainen, M. Implicit Segmentation of a Stream of Syllables Based on Transitional Probabilities: An MEG Study. J Psycholinguist Res 41, 71–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9182-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9182-2