Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 237–253 | Cite as

The On-Line Processing of Verb-Phrase Ellipsis in Aphasia

  • Josée Poirier
  • Lewis P. Shapiro
  • Tracy Love
  • Yosef Grodzinsky
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We investigate the on-line processing of verb-phrase ellipsis (VPE) constructions in two brain injured populations: Broca’s and Anomic aphasics. VPE constructions are built from two simple clauses; the first is the antecedent clause and the second is the ellipsis clause. The ellipsis clause is missing its verb and object (i.e., its verb phrase (VP)), which receives its reference from the fully specified VP in the antecedent clause. VPE constructions are unlike other sentence types that require displacement of an argument NP; these latter constructions (e.g., object-relatives, wh-questions) yield either on-time or delayed antecedent reactivation. Our results demonstrate that Anomics, like unimpaired individuals, evince reactivation of the direct object NP (within the VP) at the elided position. Broca’s patients, on the other hand, do not show reactivation of the antecedent. We consider several interpretations for our data, including explanations focusing on the larger ‘grain size’ of the reconstructed material in the ellipsis clause, the properties of the auxiliary that carries tense and agreement features, and the possibility that the cost-free syntactic copy procedure claimed to underlie VPE may be modulated by the functional deficit in Broca’s aphasia.

Keywords

Aphasia Sentence processing Verb-phrase ellipsis Aphasia classification 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., Burgel, U., Mohlberg, H., Uylings, H. B., & Zilles, K. (1999). Broca’s region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 412, 319–341. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-7.Google Scholar
  2. Arregui, A., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Moulton, K. (2006). Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.Google Scholar
  3. Balogh, J., Zurif, E., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Finkel, L. (1998). Gap-filling and end-of-sentence effects in real-time language processing: Implications for modeling sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61 169–182. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1917.
  4. Bélanger S. (2004). Processing of deep and surface anaphors. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics: Special Issue on Syntax and Psycholinguistics 22: 1–40 Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, D. C., Garrett, M. F., & Zurif, E. B.(1980). Syntactic deficits in Broca’s aphasia. In D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological studies of mental processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burkhardt, P., Mercedes Piñango, M., & Wong, K. (2003). The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity. Brain and Language, 86, 9–22. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00526-6.
  7. Burkhardt, P., Avrutin, S., Piñango, M. M., & Ruigendijk, E. (2008). Slower-than-normal syntactic processing in agrammatic broca’s aphasia: Evidence from dutch. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 120–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.004.Google Scholar
  8. Caplan, D., Waters, G., Dede, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language, 101, 103–150. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.225
  9. Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1.
  10. Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S. M., & Pereira, F. C. N. (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 399–452. doi: 10.1007/BF00630923.
  11. Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2004). The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection. Brain and Language, 88, 108–127. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00283-9.
  12. Dickey, M. W., Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2007). Real-time comprehension of wh-movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language, 100, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.004.
  13. Drai, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2006). A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neuroysyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.016.
  14. Elbourne, P. (2008). Ellipsis sites as definite descriptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 191–220. doi: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.2.191.
  15. Fiengo, R., & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2001). Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy. Syntax, 4, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9612.00034.
  17. Frazier L. and Clifton C. Jr (2005). The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8: 121–174 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedmann, N., & Shapiro, L. P. (2003). Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 46, 288–297. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/023).
  19. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E.(1972). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  20. Grodzinsky Y. (1986). Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language 27: 135–159 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50, 27–51. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1039.
  22. Grodzinsky Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–21 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grodzinsky, Y., & Finkel, L. (1998). The neurology of empty categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 281–292. doi: 10.1162/089892998562708.Google Scholar
  24. Grodzinsky, Y., Piñango, M. M., Zurif, E., & Drai, D. (1999). The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 134–147. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2050.
  25. Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1991). Syntactic priming in broca’s aphasics: Evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology, 5, 247–263. doi: 10.1080/02687039108248527.
  26. Hardt, D. (1993). Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  27. Hardt, D. (1999). Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 187–221. doi: 10.1023/A:1005427813846.
  28. Hickok, G., Zurif, E., & Canseco-Gonzalez, E., (1993). Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 45, 371–395. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1051.
  29. Johnson, K. (2001). What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory pp. 439–479.Google Scholar
  30. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
  31. Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S.(1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  32. Kehler A. (2000). Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 533–575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery test manual (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  34. ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Stegeman, D. F. (1999). Electrophysiological manifestations of open- and closed-class words in patients with Broca’s aphasia with agrammatic comprehension: An event-related brain potential study. Brain, 122, 839–854.Google Scholar
  35. ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Lexical processing of vocabulary class in patients with Broca’s aphasia: An event-related brain potential study on agrammatic comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1547–1561.Google Scholar
  36. Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Love T. and Swinney D. (1996). Conference processing and levels of analysis in object relative; demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25: 5–24 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Love, T., & Oster, E. (2002). On the categorization of aphasic typologies: The SOAP (a test of syntactic complexity). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 503–529. doi: 10.1023/A:1021208903394.Google Scholar
  39. Love, T., Swinney, D., Walenski, M., & Zurif, E. (2008). How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.004.
  40. Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 879–906. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.010.Google Scholar
  41. Mauner, G., Fromkin, V. A., & Cornell, T. L. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45, 340–370. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1050.
  42. Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nagel, H. N., Shapiro, L.P., & Nawy, R. (1994). Prosody and the processing of filler-gap constructions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23 473–486.Google Scholar
  44. Prather P., Shapiro L.P., Zurif E.B. and Swinney D. (1991). Real-time examinations of lexical processing in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20: 271–281 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenberg, B., Zurif, E. B., Brownell, H., Garrett, M. F., & Bradley, D. C. (1985). Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing. Brain and Language, 26, 287–303. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(85)90044-6.
  46. Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  47. Santi A. and Grodzinsky Y. (2007). working memory with Syntax: Bi-hemispheric modulations. Human Brain Mapping 28: 1089–97 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shapiro, L. P., & Hestvik, A. (1995). On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 517–532. doi: 10.1007/BF02143165.Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro, L. P., Hestvik, A., Lesan, L., & Garcia, A. R. (2003). Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00026-3.
  50. Swinney, D., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., & Bresnan, J. (1987). The time course of coindexation during sentence comprehension. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting, Seattle.Google Scholar
  51. Swinney, D., & Prather, P. (1989). On the comprehension of lexical ambiguity by young children: Investigations into the development of mental modularity. Resolving Semantic Ambiguity 225–238.Google Scholar
  52. Swinney D.A., Zurif E.B. and Cutler A. (1980). Effects of sentential stress and word class upon comprehension in Broca’s aphasics. Brain and Language 10: 132–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P., & Love, T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 174–184.Google Scholar
  54. Thompson, C. K., & Choy, J. J. (This volume). Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eye movements.Google Scholar
  55. Vasic, N., Avrutin, S., & Rui gendijk, E. (2006). Interpretation of pronouns in VP-ellipsis constructions in Dutch Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 191–206.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 101–139.Google Scholar
  57. Zurif, E. B. (2000). Syntactic and semantic composition. Brain and Language, 71(1), 261–263. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1054.
  58. Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448–464. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1054.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josée Poirier
    • 1
  • Lewis P. Shapiro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tracy Love
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yosef Grodzinsky
    • 4
  1. 1.SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Language & Communicative DisordersSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  4. 4.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations