Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Lexical Prosody and Word Familiarity on Lexical Access of Spoken Japanese Words

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lexical prosody (e.g., stress and pitch accent) has been shown to constrain lexical activation of spoken words in various languages. In the present study, whether or not the constraint of lexical prosody is affected by word familiarity in lexical access of Japanese words was examined using a cross-modal priming task. The stimuli were pairs of prosodically different homophones (minimal accent pairs). When the targets were more familiar members of minimal accent pairs, the responses were facilitated by prior presentations of primes that were prosodically different homophones of the targets, suggesting that lexical prosody did not constrain lexical activation. In contrast, when less familiar members of minimal accent pairs were used as the targets, the prosodically different homophones did not facilitate the responses to the targets. These results suggest that the constraint of lexical prosody is not so strong but is affected by the factor of word relative familiarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckman M.E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond Z.S., Small L.H. (1983). Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech. Perception & Psychophysics 34:470–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Connine C.M., Mullennix J., Shernoff E., Yelen J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16:1084–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper N., Cutler A., Wales R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and nonnative listeners. Language and Speech 45:207–228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech 29:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A., Clifton C. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In: Bouma H., Bouwhuis D.G. (eds) Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ, pp. 183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A., Dahan D., Donselaar W. Van (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 40:141–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A., Donselaar W. Van (2001). Voornaam is not a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech 44:171–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A., Otake T. (1999). Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 105:1877–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donselaar W. Van., Koster M., Cutler A. (2005). Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A:251–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger S.D. (1998). Signal detection comparisons of phonemic and phonetic priming: The flexible-bias problem. Perception & Psychophysics 60:952–965

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger S.D., Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 28:501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger S.D., Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B., Marcario J.K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18:1211–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuven, V. J. Van (1985). Perception of stress pattern and word recognition: Recognition of Dutch words with incorrect stress position. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, s21.

  • Kubozono H. (1993). The organization of Japanese prosody. Kurosio Publisher, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce P.A., Goldinger S.D., Auer E.T., Vitevitch M.S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics 62:615–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25:71–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson W. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: Altmann G.T.M. (eds) Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 148–172

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18:1–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen J.M., Norris D.G., Cutler A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20:621–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minematsu N., Hirose K. (1995). Roles of prosodic features in the human process of perceiving spoken words and sentences in Japanese. Journal of Acoustical Society of Japan (E) 16:311–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: Besner D., Humphresy G. (eds) Basic processes in reading: visual word recognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 264–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Nihon Housou Kyoukai. (1985). Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten [NHK’s dictionary of Japanese accent and pronunciation]. Tokyo: NHK. (in Japanese)

  • Norris D.G. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52:189–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otake T., Cutler A. (1999). Perception of suprasegmental structure in a non-native dialect. Journal of Phonetics 27:229–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otake T., Hatano G., Cutler A., Mehler J. (1993). Mora or Syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 32:258–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert J., Beckman M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt M.A., Shoaf L. (2002). Revisiting bias effects in word-initial phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28:1120–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekiguchi T., Nakajima Y. (1999). The use of lexical prosody for lexical access of the Japanese Language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slowiaczek L.M. (1990). Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition. Language and Speech 33:47–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Faraco S., Sebastián-Gallés N., Cutler A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 45:412–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi P. (1996). Cross-modal semantic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 11:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32:25–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Sekiguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sekiguchi, T. Effects of Lexical Prosody and Word Familiarity on Lexical Access of Spoken Japanese Words. J Psycholinguist Res 35, 369–384 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9020-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9020-0

Keywords

Navigation