Advertisement

Sound-symbolism: A Piece in the Puzzle of Word Learning

  • Susan J. Parault
  • Paula J. Schwanenflugel
Original Article

Abstract

Sound-symbolism is the idea that the relationship between word sounds and word meaning is not arbitrary for all words, but rather that there are subsets of words in the world’s languages for which sounds and their symbols have some degree of correspondence. The present research investigates sound-symbolism as a possible route to the learning of an unknown word’s meaning. Three studies compared the guesses that adult participants made regarding the potential meanings of sound-symbolic and non-sound symbolic obsolete words. In each study, participants were able to generate better definitions for sound-symbolic words when compared to non-sound symbolic words. Participants were also more likely to recognize the meanings of sound symbolic words. The superior performance on sound-symbolic words held even when definitions generated on the basis of sound association were eliminated. It is concluded that sound symbolism is a word property that influences word learning.

Keywords

Sound symbolism Vocabulary development Word learning 

References

  1. Andrews S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychometric Bulletin & Review 4, 439–461Google Scholar
  2. Benson J., Nasser F. (1998). On the use of factor analysis as a research tool. Journal of Vocational Education Research 23, 13–33Google Scholar
  3. Bloomfield L. (1933). Language. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolinger D. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6, 117–136Google Scholar
  5. Brennan R.L. (1992). Elements of generalizabilty theory. ACT Publications, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown R.W. (1958). Words and things. The Free Press, Glencoe, ILGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown R.W., Black A.H., Horowitz A.E. (1955). Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50, 388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll J.B., Davies P., Richman B. (1971). Word frequency book. American Heritage Publishing Co., Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassidy K.W., Kelly M.H., Sharoni L.J. (1999). Inferring gender from name phonology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128, 362–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassidy K.W., Kelly M.H. (2001). Children’s use of phonology to infer grammatical class in vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review Journal 8, 519–523Google Scholar
  11. Choi S., Gopnik A. (1995). Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language 22, 497–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciccotosto N. (1991). Sound symbolism in natural language (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1991) Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 541.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen J. (1968). Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crick, J. E., & Brennan, R. L. (1984) GENOVA A general purpose analysis of variance system [Computer software and manual].Google Scholar
  15. Dale E., O’Rourke J., Barbe W.B. (1986). Vocabulary building: A process approach. Zaner-Bloser, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  16. Durso F.T., Shore W.J. (1991). Partial knowledge of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120, 190–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ervin S.M. (1961). Changes with age in the verbal determinants of word-association. American Journal of Psychology 74, 361–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrar W.T., Van Order G.C., Harmouz V. (2001). When SOFA primes TOUCH: Interdependence of spelling sound and meaning in “semantically mediated” phonological priming. Memory & Cognition 29, 530–539Google Scholar
  19. Grambs D. (1994). The endangered English dicitonary. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Halliwell J.O. (1850). A dictionary of archaic and provincial words, obsolete phrases. proverbs, and ancient customs. John Russell Smith, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinton L., Nichols J., Ohala J.J. (1994). Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelly M.H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review 99, 349–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kess J.F. (1992). Psycholinguistics: Psychology, linguistics, and the study of natural language. John Benjamin Publishing Company, Victoria, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  24. Laird C.G., Agnes M. (1999). Webster’s New World Roget’s A–Z thesaurus. Macmillan USA, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. LeCron Foster M. (1978). The symbolic structure of primordial language. In Washburn S.L., McCown E.R. (eds). Human evolution biosocial perspectives. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Merlo Park, California, pp. 77–122Google Scholar
  26. MacKay C. (1879). The lost beauties of the English language. Chatton & Windus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Malkiel Y. (1990). Diachronic problems in phonosymbolism. J. Benjamin Publishing Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Markel N.N., Hamp E. (1960). Connective meanings of certain phoneme sequences. Studies in Linguistics 15, 41–61Google Scholar
  29. McCure, K. (1985). The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Badan Penyelenggara Seri Nusa, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.Google Scholar
  30. Nagy W.E., Anderson R.C., Herman P.A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal 24, 12Google Scholar
  31. Nagy W.E., Herman P.A., Anderson R.C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly 20, 233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nuckolls J.B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28, 225–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Seaghdha P.G., Marin J.W. (1997). Mediated semantic–phonological priming: Calling distant relatives. Journal of Memory & Language 36, 226–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rhodes R.A., Lawler J.M. (1981). Athematic metaphors. Chicago Linguistic Society 17, 318–342Google Scholar
  35. Sapir E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12, 225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saussure F.D. (1959). Course in general linguistics. Philosophical Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwanenflugel P.J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand. In Schwanenflugel P.J. (eds). The psychology of word meaning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 223–250Google Scholar
  38. Schwanenflugel P.J., Stahl S.A., McFalls E.L. (1997). Partial word knowledge and vocabulary growth during reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research 29, 531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sereno J.A. (1994). Phonosyntactics. In Hinton L., Nichols J., Ohala J.J. (eds). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 263–275Google Scholar
  40. Shore W.J., Durso F.T. (1990). Partial knowledge in vocabulary acquisition: General constraints and specific detail. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations