Abstract
The role of prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was investigated by means of three different tasks, namely auditory word monitoring (Experiment 1), self-paced reading (Experiment 2) and cross-modal comparison (Experiment 3). In all three experiments a critical prosodic unit or frame comprising a determiner, a noun and a Prepositional Phrase (PP) was preceded or surrounded by two context prosodic units (frames) whose length was varied. The participants’ tendency to interpret the critical sequence as forming a single syntactic constituent (noun–complement interpretation of the PP) as opposed to two distinct syntactic constituents (verb–complement interpretation of the PP) was found to depend on the relative length of the critical and context prosodic units (frames). As a whole these results are consistent with the notion that phrasing effects occur in a retroactive way, after part of the utterance has been processed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeillé, A., Clément, L., & Kinyon, A. (2001). Building a treebank for French. In Building and using syntactically annotated corpora. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Abeillé, A., Pynte, J., & Toussenel, F. (2001). Constituent length and attachment preferences in French. Poster presented at AMLaP, September, Sarrbrucken, Germany.
Beauvillain C., Beauvillain P. (1995). Calibration of an eye movement system for use in reading. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 55, 1–17
Beckman M., Pierrehumbert J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonological Yearbook 3, 255–309
Boula de Mareüil P., Célérier P., Cesses T., Fabre S., Jobin C., Le Meur P.-Y., Obadia D., Soulage B., Toen J. (2001). Elan text-to-speech: un système multilingue de synthèse de la parole à partir de texte. Traitement Automatique des Langues 42, 1–30
Briscoe E.J. (1984) The interactive determinism hypothesis: A model of Human Spoken Processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge, England
Briscoe E.J. (1987). Modeling Human Speech Comprehension: A computational Approach. Wiley, Chichester: Ellis Horwood/New York
Colonna, S.& Pynte, J. (2001a). Relative clause attachment in French: The role of Fodor’s “same-size-sister” constraint, Poster presented at Workshop on Prosody Processing, 5–6 July, Utrecht, Pays-bas.
Colonna, S., & Pynte, J. (2001b). The role of Fodor’s “same-size-sister” constraint in relative clause attachment in French, Poster presented at ESCOP 12, 5–8 September, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Cutler A., Dahan D., van Donselaar W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 40, 141–201
De Cornuiler B. (1979). Problèmes de métrique française. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France
De Vincenzi M., Job R. (1993). Some observations on the universality of the late-closure Strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22, 189–206
De Vincenzi M., Job R. (1995). An investigation of late closure. Journal of Experimental. Psychology. L., M. & C., 21, 1303–1321
Fernandez, E., Fodor, J. D., Almeida, R. G., Bradley, D., & Quinn, D. (2003). Relative clause attachment in Canadian French: prosodic boundary or F0-Matching? Paper presented at CUNY 2003, Boston: March.
Fernandez E.M. (2003). Bilingual Sentence Processing: Relative Clause Attachment in English and Spanish. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Fernandez, E. M. & Bradley, D. (1999). Length effects in the attachment of relative clauses in English. Poster presented at the 12th annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
Fodor, J. D. (2002). Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. Proceeding of the first conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France, 11–13 April.
Fodor J.D. (1998). Learning to parse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27, 285–319
Frenck-Mestre C., Pynte J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 119–148
Frenck-Mestre C., Pynte J. (2000a). Romancing syntactic ambiguity: Why the French and the Italian don’t see eye to eye. In Kennedy A., Radach R., Heller D., Pynte J. (eds). Reading as a perceptual process. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 549–564
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (2000b). Resolving syntactic ambiguities: cross-linguistic differences? In De Vincenzi, M., & Lombardo, V. (Eds.) Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing (pp. 119–148). Kluwer Academic.
Gee J.P., Grosjean F. (1983). Performance structures: a psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology 15, 411–458
Gibson E. (1998). Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 1–76
Gilboy E., Sopena M. (1996). Segmentation effects in the processing of complex NPs with relative clauses. In: Carreiras M., Garcia-Albea J.E., Sebastian-Galles N. (eds). Language processing in Spanish. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.
Haussmann R.E. (1992). Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM/XT/AT and PS/2: A turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 24, 303–310
Hemforth, B., Fernandez, S., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Konieczny, L., & Walter, M. (submitted). Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish, and French: Effects of position and length.
Hirose, Y. (1999). Resolving reanalysis ambiguity in Japanese relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation. City University of New York.
Hirose, Y. (2000). The role of constituent length in resolving reanalysis ambiguity. In proceedings of the first Tokyon conference on Pycholinguistics (pp. 55–74). Tokyo: Hitsuji Syobo Publishing Ldt.
Hirst D. (1993). Detaching intonational phrases from syntactic structure. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 782–788
Lovric, N., Bradley, D., & Fodor, J. (2000). RC attachment in Croatian with and without prepositions. Poster presented at the AMLaP Conference, Leiden.
Lovric, N., Bradley, D., & Fodor, J. (2001). Silent prosody resolves syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from Croatioan. Paper presented at the SUNY/CUNY/NYU Conference, Stonybrook, NY.
Marcus M., Hindle D. (1990). Description theory and intonational boundaries. In: Altman G.T.M. (eds). Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Mitchell D.C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In Coltheart M. (eds). Attention and Performance XII, The Psychology of reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 601–618
Monnin P., Grosjean F. (1993). Les structure de performance du français: caractérisation et prédiction. L’Année Psychologique 93, 9–30
Nespor M., Vogel I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Foris, Dordrecht
Pickering M., Traxler M., Crocker M. (2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory & Language 43, 447–475
Pierrehumbert J., Beckman M. (′1988). Japanese Tone structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Pynte J. (1998a). The time-course of attachment decisions: Evidence from French. In Hillert D. (eds). Syntax and semantics: A crosslinguistic perspective. Vol 31, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 227–245
Pynte J. (1998b). The role of Prosody in Semantic Interpretation. Music Perception 16, 79–97
Pynte, J., & Colonna, S. (1998). French readers sometimes prefer to attach low. Paper presented at the annual conference on Architecture and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Freiburg, September, 24–26.
Pynte J., Colonna S. (2000). Decoupling syntactic parsing from visual inspection: The case of relative clause attachment in French. In Kennedy A., Radach R., Heller D., Pynte J. (eds). Reading as a perceptual process. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 529–547
Pynte J., Prieur B. (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 11, 165–191
Quinn, D., Abdelghany, H., & Fodor, J. D. (2000). More evidence of implicit prosody in silent reading: French, English, and Arabic relative clauses. Poster presented at the 13th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, La Jolla, March 30–April 1.
Selkirk E. (2000). The interactions of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In: Horne M. (eds). Prosody: Theory and experiment. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Selkirk E.O. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Selkirk E.O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 371–405
Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Sedivy J.C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition 55, 227–267
Thornton R., MacDonald M.C., Gil M. (1999). Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 25, 1347–1365
Thornton R., MacDonald M., Arnold J.E. (2000). The concomitant effects of phrase length and informational content in sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 195–203
Truckenbrodt H. (1999). On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 219–255
Watson D., Gibson E. (2004). Making sense of the sense unit condition. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 508–517
Watson D., Gibson E. (2005). Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and comprehension. Studia Linguistica 59, 279–300
Zagar D., Pynte J., Rativeau S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first pass reading times in French. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 421–438
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pynte, J. Phrasing Effects in Comprehending PP Constructions. J Psycholinguist Res 35, 245–265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9014-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9014-y