The Nature and Time Course of Pragmatic Plausibility Effects
- 69 Downloads
The experiments reported in this article used a delayed same/different sentence matching task with concurrent measurement of eye movements to investigate the nature of the plausibility effect. The results clearly show that plausibility effects are not due to low level lexical associative processes, but arise as a consequence of the processing of the earliest or most basic form of sentential meaning. In fact, when sentential implausibility and lexical association are varied simultaneously, it is only sentential implausibility that exerts an effect. Effects of implausibility occur rapidly—sometimes parafoveally—and are localised in the regions of the sentence where the implausibility occurs, suggesting an incremental interpretive process progressing on a roughly word-by-word basis. It is suggested that plausibility effects result from the operation of a heuristically-driven process of sentential interpretation. This appears to behave in a ‘modular’ fashion, despite being influenced by real world knowledge and probabilities.
KeywordsPlausibility Sentence Matching Eye Movements Parafoveal processing Modularity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Fodor J.A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Forster K.I. (1974). The role of semantic hypotheses in sentence processing. In: Bresson F., Mehler J.(eds). Current Problems in Psycholinguistics. Editions du C.N.R.S., ParisGoogle Scholar
- Forster K.I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In: Cooper W.E., Walker E.C.T. (eds). Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 27–81Google Scholar
- Forster K.I. (1987). Binding, plausibility, and modularity. In: Garfield J.L. (eds). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Kucera H., Francis W.N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Brown University Press, Providence, RIGoogle Scholar
- McCawley J.D. (1971). Where do noun phrases come from. In: Steinberg D.D., Jakobovits L.A. (eds). Semantics. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Murray, W. S. (1982). Sentence matching: The influence of meaning and structure. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Monash University.Google Scholar
- Murray, W. S., & Marshall, J.-A. (2004). More parafoveal pragmatics. Paper presented at the Sixth European Workshop on Language Comprehension, Oleron, May.Google Scholar
- Ratcliff, J. (1983). Inference processes in the early stages of sentence comprehension: A study of the plausibility effect. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Monash University.Google Scholar
- Watson, I. J. (1976). The processing of implausible sentences. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Monash University.Google Scholar