The Influence of Training, Reluctance, Efficacy, and Stigma on Suicide Intervention Behavior Among NCOs in the Army and Marine Corps
The Army and Marine Corps have consistently experienced the highest rates of suicide relative to the other services. In both the Army and Marine Corps, the service members responsible for identifying and referring individuals at risk for suicide are called “gatekeepers” and are typically noncommissioned officers (NCOs). We used structural equation modeling on survey responses from 1184 Army soldiers and 796 marines to estimate the relationships between training, intervention efficacy, reluctance, and mental health stigma on NCO intervention behaviors. Efficacy and reluctance were independently associated with intervention behaviors, and stigma was only associated with intervention behaviors among Army NCOs. Study results suggest that while quantity of training may help NCOs feel more confident about their ability to intervene, other efforts such as changing training content and delivery mode (e.g., interactive vs. didactic training) may be necessary in order to reduce reluctance and stigma to intervene with service members at risk for suicide.
KeywordsSuicide Military Gatekeeper Stigma
This research is sponsored by the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center, part of the RAND National Defense Research Institute (NDRI). NDRI is a federal funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. We also acknowledge individuals in the DoD, particularly our project sponsor Captain Janet Hawkins, and from the Army: Army Chaplain (Major General) Donald L. Rutherford, Army Chaplain (Colonel) Dallas Speight, Mr. Bruce Shabaz, Col. George Glaze, CDR Andrew Martin, LtCol Sean Stallard as well as the NCO cadre and their immediate leadership at each installation that were kind enough to allow us access into their training academies.
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
- Aseltine, R. H. (2003). An evaluation of a school based suicide prevention program. Adolescent & Family Health, 3(2), 81–88.Google Scholar
- Britt, T. W., Greene-Shortridge, T. M., Brink, S., Nguyen, Q. B., Rath, J., Cox, A. L., et al. (2008). Perceived stigma and barriers to care for psychological treatment: Implications for reactions to stressors in different contexts. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(4), 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burnette, C., Ramchand, R., & Ayer, L. (2015). Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: A theoretical model and review of the empirical literature. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Committee on the Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Military Personnel, Veterans, and Their Families. (2013). Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Matthieu, M. M., Cross, W., Batres, A. R., Flora, C. M., & Knox, K. L. (2008). Evaluation of gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in veterans. Archives of Suicide Research : Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research, 12(2), 148–154. doi: 10.1080/13811110701857491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7 ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
- Ramchand, R. N., Acosta, J., Burns, R. M., Jaycox, L., Pernin, C. G., Center for Military Health Policy Research, et al. (2011). The war within: Preventing suicide in the U.S. military. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
- Smolenski, D. J., Reger, M. A., Alexander, C. L., Skopp, N. A., Bush, N. E., Luxton, D. D., et al. (2013). DODSER: Department of defense suicide event report: Calendar year 2012 annual report. Department of Defense.Google Scholar
- Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., Inman, J., Cross, W., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Guo, J., & Pena, J. B. (2008). Randomized trial of a gatekeeper program for suicide prevention: 1-Year impact on secondary school staff. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 104–115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar