Advertisement

The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 119–134 | Cite as

Psychoecological Model of Alcohol Use in Mexican American Adolescents

  • Heejung Chun
  • Esther Devall
  • Patricia Sandau-Beckler
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we proposed and tested a structural model based on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory in order to further understand alcohol use among Hispanic adolescents, who are at greater risk of alcohol use than adolescents of other racial/ethnic groups. Family cohesion, school connectedness, and peer influence were conceptualized as three primary process factors, while psychological distress was used as a mediating factor and Mexican culture orientation as a cultural factor. The sample comprised 444 Mexican American adolescents (aged 16–20) living along the U.S./Mexico border. The proposed model explained 33 % of the variance in alcohol use. Most of the hypothesized relationships in the proposed model were supported: (a) low family cohesion had significant indirect effects mediated through psychological distress, poor school connectedness, and negative peer influence; (b) poor school connectedness had significant indirect effects mediated through psychological distress and negative peer influence; (c) psychological distress had a significant direct effect as well as a significant indirect effect mediated through negative peer influence; and (d) negative peer influence had the strongest direct effect. However, contrary to the hypothesis, Mexican culture orientation was not a protective factor, but rather had a significant positive relationship with negative peer influence. Lastly, it was found that gender, school status, Anglo cultural orientation, and severity of alcohol use did not have any moderating effects. Based on the collective findings, suggestions for primary prevention programs designed to reduce underage drinking among Mexican American youth were given.

Keywords

Mexican American adolescents Alcohol use Psychoecological model Cultural orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by grant 1461 from the Paso Del Norte Health Foundation, Center for Border Health Research, 1100 N. Stanton #410, El Paso, TX 79902.

References

  1. Almodovar, A., Tomaka, J., Thompson, S., McKinnon, S., & O’Rourke, K. (2006). Risk and protective factors among high school students on the US/Mexico border. American Journal of Health Behavior, 30, 745–752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alva, S. A. (1995). Psychological distress and alcohol use in Hispanic adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alva, S., & Jones, M. (1994). Psychosocial adjustment and self-reported patterns of alcohol use among Hispanic adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., Saunders, J. B., & Grant, M. (1989). AUDIT—The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary health care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, S. M., Ledsky, R., Goodenow, C., & O’Donnell, L. (2001). Recency of immigration, substance use, and sexual behavior among Massachusetts adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 794–798.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th edn., pp. 993–1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 793–828). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., Richter, L., & Whiteman, M. (2003). Risk and protective factors of adolescent drug use: Implications for prevention programs. In Z. Sloboda & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention: Theory, science, and practice (pp. 265–287). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Castro, F. G., Stein, J. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2009). Ethnic pride, traditional family values, and acculturation in early cigarette and alcohol use among Latino adolescents. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 265–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/yrbs.
  13. Chassin, L., Pitts, S. C., & Prost, J. (2002). Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood in a high-risk sample: Predictors and substance abuse outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 67–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colder, C. R., Campbell, R. T., Ruel, E., Richardson, J. L., & Flay, B. R. (2002). A finite mixture model of growth trajectories of adolescent alcohol use: Predictors and consequences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 976–985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuellar, I., Arnold, B., & Maldonado, R. (1995). Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II: A revision of the original ARSMA scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davey, A., Savla, J., & Luo, Z. (2005). Issues in evaluating model fit with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 578–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De La Rosa, M. (2002). Acculturation and Latino adolescents’ substance use: A research agenda for the future. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 429–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeRosier, M. E. (2004). Building relationships and combating bullying: Effectiveness of a school-based social skills group intervention. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 196–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dornbusch, S. M., Erickson, K., Laird, J., & Wong, C. A. (2001). The relation of family and school attachment to adolescent deviance in diverse groups and communities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 396–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frauenglass, S., Routh, D. K., Pantin, H. M., & Mason, C. A. (1997). Family support decreases influence of deviant peers on Hispanic adolescents’ substance use. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 15–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., & Cothern, L. (2000, April). Predictors of youth violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  24. Henry, K. L. (2008). Low prosocial attachment, involvement with drug-using peers, and adolescent drug use: A longitudinal examination of mediational mechanisms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 302–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henry, K. L., Oetting, E. R., & Slater, M. D. (2009). The role of attachment to family, school, and peers in adolescents’ use of alcohol: A longitudinal study of within-person and between-person effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 564–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill, N. E., & Torres, K. (2010). Negotiating the American dream: The paradox of aspirations and achievement among Latino students and engagement between their families and schools. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman, B. R., Monge, P. R., Chou, C. P., & Valente, T. W. (2007). Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1546–1554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterization model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2011: Volume I, secondary school students. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplow, J. B., Curran, P. J., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2001). The prospective relation between dimensions of anxiety and the initiation of adolescent alcohol use. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 316–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr, M. H., Beck, K. H., Shattuck, T. D., Kattar, C., & Uriburu, D. (2003). Family involvement, problem and prosocial behavior outcomes of Hispanic youth. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Suppl. 1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ketterlinus, R. D., Lamb, M. E., & Nitz, K. A. (1994). Adolescent nonsexual and sex-related problem behaviors: Their prevalence, consequences, and co-occurrence. In R. D. Ketterlinus & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Adolescent problem behaviors: Issues and research (pp. 17–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Leffert, N., Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Sharma, A. R., Drake, D. R., & Blyth, D. A. (1998). Developmental assets: Measurement and prediction of risk behaviors. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lopez, B., Wang, W., Schwartz, S. J., Prado, G., Huang, S., & Hendricks Brown, C. (2009). School, family, and peer factors and their association with substance use in Hispanic adolescents. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 622–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNamara, R. S., Swaim, R. C., & Rosén, L. A. (2010). Components of negative affect as moderators of the relationship between early drinking onset and binge-drinking behavior. Journal of Child and Adolescence Substance Abuse, 19, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montanez, M., Devall, E., & Van Leeuwen, D. M. (2010). Social capital: Strengthening Mexican-American families through parenting education. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 102, 27–33.Google Scholar
  40. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxem, A., & Wilson, M. (1992). Family inventories (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science.Google Scholar
  42. Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. Theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pong, S., & Zeiser, K. L. (2012). Student engagement, school climate, and academic achievement of immigrants’ children. In C. García Coll & A. K. Marks (Eds.), The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk? (pp. 209–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Sale, E., Sambrano, S., Springer, J. F., Peña, C., Pan, W., & Kasim, R. (2005). Family protection and prevention of alcohol use among Hispanic youth at high risk. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 195–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shochet, I. M., Smyth, T., & Homel, R. (2007). The impact of parental attachment on adolescent perception of the school environment and school connectedness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tschann, J. M., Flores, E., Pasch, L. A., & Marin, B. V. (2005). Emotional distress, alcohol use, and peer violence among Mexican-American and European-American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 11–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyler, K. M., Boelter, C. M., & Boykin, A. W. (2008). Linking teachers’ perceptions of educational value discontinuity to low-income middle school students’ academic engagement & self-efficacy. Middle Grades Research Journal, 3, 1–20.Google Scholar
  50. Unger, J. B., Ritt-Olson, A., Soto, D. W., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2009). Parent–child acculturation discrepancies as a risk factor for substance use among Hispanic adolescents in Southern California. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 11, 149–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wanberg, K. W. (1992). Adolescent self assessment profile. Arvada, CO: Center for Alcohol/Drug Abuse and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  52. Wang, M. Q., Matthew, R. F., Bellamy, N., & James, S. (2005). A structural model of the substance use pathways among minority youth. American Journal of Health Behavior, 6, 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, J., Simons-Morton, B. G., Farhart, T., & Luk, J. W. (2009). Socio-demographic variability in adolescent substance use: Mediation by parents and peers. Prevention Science, 10, 387–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., Shinar, O., & Yaeger, A. (1999). Contributions of positive and negative affect to adolescent substance abuse: Test of a bidimensional model in a longitudinal study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan, F. A., Beck, K. H., Howard, D., Shattuck, T. D., & Kerr, M. H. (2008). A structural model of alcohol use pathways among Latino youth. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32, 209–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zamboanga, B. L., Raffaelli, M., & Horton, N. J. (2006). Acculturation status and heavy alcohol use among Mexican American college students: Investigating the moderating role of gender. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 2188–2198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heejung Chun
    • 1
  • Esther Devall
    • 2
  • Patricia Sandau-Beckler
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Counseling and Educational PsychologyNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, MSC 3470New Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations