Examining the Effects of a National Alcohol-Free Fraternity Housing Policy
- 218 Downloads
This investigation examined the effectiveness of an alcohol-free fraternity housing policy on the risky alcohol use of members of a national fraternity (N=718). Comparisons of members in chapters with fraternity housing (FH) and those in chapters without housing (NFH) over time revealed no policy-related effects on measures of alcohol use. Among FH members, comparisons of those who lived in fraternity housing and those who lived in other housing also found no effects. FH members reported that the policy was implemented moderately well; however, it may have shifted alcohol use from fraternity housing to other settings.
Editors’ Strategic Implications: The results of this study will be of interest to national and local fraternity administrators, campus student affairs and dean of students offices, and substance use counselors in various settings. For fraternity and possibly other college student populations, an alcohol-free housing policy appears to be a strategy that does not work.
KEY WORDS:alcohol-free policy fraternity university multi-level
This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (RO1 AA012532). We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of colleagues Bernadette Campbell, Karin Davis, Joe Gertig, John Kennedy, Mary Kliesch, Joy Kosman, Bill Luckey, Sanjeev Sridharan, Anne Worthen, and Nicole Yoshida. Some of the findings from this paper were previously presented at the meeting of the American Evaluation Association in Arlington, VA (November 2002).
- Dowdall, G. W., & Wechsler, H. (2002). Studying college alcohol use: Widening the lens, sharpening the focus. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(Suppl. 14), 14–22.Google Scholar
- Fraternity Executives Association (FEA) (2002). FEA Survey 2001–2002. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
- Kapner, D. A. (2003). Alcohol and other drugs on campus: The scope of the problem. Retrieved August 8, 2003, from www.edc.org/ec/ubs/factsheets/cope.html.Google Scholar
- Larimer, M. E., & Cronce, J. M. (2002). Identification, prevention and treatment: A review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(Suppl. 14), 148–163.Google Scholar
- Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., & Larimer, M. E. (1995). Preventing alcohol abuse in college students: A harm-reduction approach. In G. M. Boyd, J. Howard, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), Alcohol problems among adolescents: Current directions in prevention research (pp. 147–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1994). Computing a BAC estimate. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Task Force of the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2002). A call to action: Changing the culture of drinking at U.S. colleges [NIH Publication No. 02–5010]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
- National Panhellenic Conference (2004a). College Panhellenics: Programs. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.npcwomen.org/college/c_programs.php.Google Scholar
- National Panhellenic Conference (2004b). Policies: Resolutions and recommendations. Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://www.npcwomen.org/policies/p_resolutions.php.Google Scholar
- O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2002). Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(Suppl. 14), 23–39.Google Scholar
- Presley, C. A., Meilman, P. W., & Cashin, J. R. (1996). Alcohol and drugs on American college campuses: Use, consequences, and perceptions of the campus environment, vol. IV: 1992–94. Carbondale, IL: Core Institute, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edn.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992). Timeline Followback: A technique for assessing self-reported ethanol consumption. In J. Allen & R. Z. Litten (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods (pp. 41–72). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
- Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1993). Alcohol Timeline Followback users’ manual. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, H., Kuh, G., & Davenport, A. E. (1996). Fraternities, sororities and binge drinking: Results from a national study of American colleges. NASPA Journal, 33, 260–279.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002). Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001. Journal of American College Health, 50, 203–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar