Cardiovascular Health Status and Health Risk Assessment Method of Preference Among Worksite Employees
- 86 Downloads
We investigated whether employees (n = 62) selecting a self-report Health Risk Assessment (HRA) would be at increased CVD risk compared to employees (n = 114) choosing an HRA with measurement of cardiovascular (CVD) health indicators. Participants were mostly middle-aged (44.1 ± 0.8 yr) men (71.6%) displaying borderline features of the cardiometabolic syndrome. Although there were no significant differences between the groups regarding their measured CVD health status or self-reported lifestyle habits, employees in both groups consistently over-stated their level of cardiovascular health. Contrary to reports in the literature, cardiovascular health status did not appear to influence employee HRA method of preference.
Editors' Strategic Implications: These findings await replication in other samples, both more diverse and less self-selected. Nonetheless, the authors' methods and their conclusions about workers' over-estimation of their health and the lack of differences across assessment methods will be useful to employers, health professionals, and all practitioners with an interest in health risk assessments.
KEY WORDS:cardiovascular disease health promotion health screen metabolic syndrome self-report
- American College of Sports Medicine (2000). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (6th edn.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- American Diabetes Association (2001). Position statement: Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24, S21–S24.Google Scholar
- American Dietetic Association. Food guide pyramid. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://www.eatright.org/Public/NutritionInformation/92_fgp.cfm.
- Anderson, R. C., & Anderson, K. E. (1991). Worksite health promotion: The benefits of providing personal health status feedback and education programs to employees. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 39, 57–61.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005). Mortality data. Washington, DC: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Retrieved September 11, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/aag/aag_cvd.htm
- Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (1997). The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (NIH Publication No. 98-4080). Washington, DC: National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National High Blood Pressure Education Program.Google Scholar
- National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) (2001). Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult treatment panel III). Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2486–2497.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (1998). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidence report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Nice, S. D., & Woodruff, S. I. (1990). Self-selection in responding to a health risk appraisal: Are we preaching to the choir? American Journal of Health Promotion, 4, 367–372.Google Scholar