Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 471–484 | Cite as

The “Generacion Diez” After-School Program and Latino Parent Involvement with Schools


The current study examines associations between participation in after-school programs and change in Latino parent involvement with schools. Hierarchical linear regression analyses demonstrated that parents of children who had higher after-school program attendance rates were significantly more likely to report increases in the quality of relationships with their children's teachers, frequency of parent-teacher contact, and engagement with their children's schooling over a two-year period. However, greater home educator contacts were related to decreases in quality and quantity of parent-school involvement. A primary implication is that attendance in school-based after-school programs may draw parents into children's regular-day school context.

Editors' Strategic Implications The authors illustrate the promising practice of using after-school programs to promote parent involvement and to help integrate the often disparate family and school contexts for Latino children.


after-school parent-teacher contact migrant Latino children 


  1. Behrman, R. (1999). The future of children: When school is out. Washington, DC: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the non-school hours. New York: Carnegie Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Children's Defense Fund (2000). Leave no child behind: The state of America's children. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund.Google Scholar
  4. Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., Ramey, L. L., Sure, M. B., & Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48, 1013–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1991a). Parent-Teacher Involvement Questionnaire: Parent version. Retrieved June 29, 2005, from
  6. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1991b). Social health profile. Retrieved June 29, 2005, from
  7. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1992). A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorder: The FAST Track program. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 509–527.Google Scholar
  8. Dauber, S. L., & Epstein, J. L. (1993). Parents' attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In N. F. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and Schools in a Pluralistic Society (pp. 53–72). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1988). Sociocultural adjustment to school and academic achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, J. L., & Lee, S. (1995). National patterns of school and family connections in the middle grades. In B. A. Ryan, G. R. Adams, T. P. Gullotta, R. P. Weissberg, & R. L. Hampton (Eds.), The family school connection: Theory research and practice (vol. 2, pp. 108–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Fantuzzo, J. W., Davis, G. Y., & Ginsburg, M. D. (1995). Effects of parent involvement in isolation or in combination with peer tutoring on student self-concept and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., Donaldson, S. I., MacKinnon, D. P., & Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis with missing data in prevention research. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 325–366). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  13. Grossman, J. B., Price, M. L., Fellerath, V., Jucovy, L. Z., Kotloff, L. J., Raley, R., & Walker, K. E. (2002). Multiple choices after school: Findings from the extended-services schools initiative. Philadelphia, PA: Public Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  14. Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children's schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammack, F. L. (1986). Large school systems' dropout reports: An analysis of definitions, procedures and findings. Teachers College Record, 87, 324–346.Google Scholar
  16. Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (Eds.). (1994). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.Google Scholar
  17. Hock, M. F., Pulvers, K. A., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (2001). The effects of an after-school tutoring program on the academic performance of at-risk students and students with LD. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Izzo, C. V., Weissberg, R. P., Kasprow, W. J., & Fendrich, M. (1999). A longitudinal assessment of teacher perceptions of parent involvement in children's education and school performance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 817–839.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jastak, J., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test—Revised (WRAT-R) Revised edition. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, M. B., & Offord, D. R. (1989). Reduction of antisocial behavior in poor children by non-school skill development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 737–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewit, E. M. (1992). Child indicators: Dropout rates for high school students. The Future of Children, 2, 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch, E. W., & Stein, R. C. (1987). Parent participation by ethnicity: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and Anglo families. Exceptional Children, 54, 105–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Marin, G., Sabogal, F., Marin, B. V., Otero-Sabogal, R., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987). Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall, N. L., Coll, C. G., Marx, F., McCartney, K., Keefe, N., & Ruh, J. (1997). After-school time and children's behavioral adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 497–514.Google Scholar
  25. Mattingly, D., Prislin, R., McKenzie, T. L., Rodriguez, J. L., & Kayzar, B. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72, 459–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moles, O. C. (1993). Collaboration between schools and disadvantaged parents: Obstacles and openings. In N. F. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 21–49) Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Morris, D., Shaw, B., & Perney, J. (1990). Helping low readers in grades 2 and 3: An after-school volunteer tutoring program. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pettit, G. S., Laird, R. D., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Patterns of after-school care in middle childhood: Risk factors and developmental outcomes. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 515–538.Google Scholar
  29. Posner, J. K., & Vandell, D. L. (1994). Low-income children's after-school care: Are there beneficial effects of after-school programs? Child Development, 65, 440–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reynolds, A. J., Weissberg, R. P., & Kasprow, W. (1992). Prediction of early social and academic adjustment of children from the inner-city. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 599–624.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Riggs, N. R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2004). Moderators in the academic development of migrant Latino children attending after-school programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schinke, S. P., Orlandi, M. A., & Cole, K. C. (1992). Boys and girls clubs in public housing developments: Prevention services for youth at risk, Journal of Community Psychology, OSAP Special Issue, 118–128.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., & Sitarenios, G. (2000). Family Assessment Measure (FAM) and process model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, T. D., & Smith, B. L. (1998). Relationship between the Wide Range Achievement Test 3 and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. Psychological Reports, 83, 963–967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child's school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348–1357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Department of Education (2003a). The nation's report card: Reading highlights (NCES Publication No. 2004451). Jessup, MD: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Department of Education (2003b). The nation's report card: Math highlights (NCES Publication No. 2004452). Jessup, MD: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Department of Education (2003c). Status and trends in the education of Hispanics. Retrieved January 8, 2004, from
  39. White, K. R., Taylor, M. J., & Moss, V. T. (1992). Does research support claims about the benefits of involving parents in early intervention programs? Review of Educational Research, 62, 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Prevention ResearchThe University of Southern CaliforniaSouthern CaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Pennsylvania Department of EducationPennsylvaniaUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Prevention ResearchUniversity of Southern CaliforniaAlhambraUSA

Personalised recommendations