Skip to main content
Log in

Differences between the isostructural IRMOF-1 and MOCP-L porous adsorbents

  • Published:
Journal of Porous Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several discrepancies have emerged about the preparation methods of MOF-5 material, one of the adsorbents more studied for hydrogen storage, because different synthesis procedures give rise to apparently isostructural materials but actually having very different textural properties and also showing different hydrogen adsorption capacities. In this work, MOF-5 material has been successfully synthesized according to the two most extended methods, and the respective resulting materials, IRMOF-1 and MOCP-L, have been widely characterized. Powder X-ray diffraction confirmed that MOF-5 is the main crystallized phase obtained in both cases, and that the MOCP-L product contains some ZnO impurities, mainly in the form of segregated crystals that appear preferentially outside the micropores. The presence of ZnO in the MOCP-L material has been also confirmed by other characterization techniques. On the other hand, interpenetrated networks in the MOCP-L material are not significant, appearing in any case at a similar extent than in IRMOF-1; consequently it cannot be considered for explaining the differences observed in the adsorption capacity of both materials. These differences cannot be completely explained simply by the segregated ZnO impurities, so the presence of some ZnO nanocrystals partially blocking the micropores of MOCP-L must be admitted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, M. O’ Keeffee, O.M. Yaghi, Nature 402, 276 (1999). doi:10.1038/46248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Huang, H. Wang, J. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Sun, D. Zhao, Y. Yan, Microp. Mesop. Mater. 58, 105 (2003). doi:10.1016/S1387-1811(02)00609-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Bordiga, C. Lamberti, G. Ricchiardi, L. Regli, F. Bonino, A. Damin, K.-P. Lillerud, M. Bjorgenb, A. Zecchina, Chem. Commun. (Camb) 2300 (2004). doi:10.1039/b407246d

  4. B. Panella, M. Hirscher, Adv. Mater. 17, 538 (2005). doi:10.1002/adma.200400946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Eddaoudi, J. Kim, N. Rosi, D. Vodak, J. Wachter, M. O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, Science 295, 469 (2002). doi:10.1126/science.1067208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.-S. Choi, W.-J. Son, J.-H. Kim, W.-S. Ahn, Microp. Mesop. Mater. 116, 727 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Rowsell, A. Millward, K. Park, O.M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5666 (2004). doi:10.1021/ja049408c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.G. Wong-Foy, A.J. Matzger, O.M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3494 (2006). doi:10.1021/ja058213h

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Calleja, D.P. Serrano, J.A. Botas, M. Sánchez-Sánchez, M.G. Orcajo, J.C. de la Torre, in International Symposium on Materials Issues in Hydrogen Production and Storage. The University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, USA, 20–25 August, 2006)

  10. J. Hafizovic, M. Bjørgen, U. Olsbye, D.C. Dietzel, S. Bordiga, C. Prestipino, C. Lamberti, K.P. Lillerud, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 3612 (2007). doi:10.1021/ja0675447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kaye, A. Dailly, O.M. Yaghi, J. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14176 (2007). doi:10.1021/ja076877g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. U. Mueller, M. Schubert, F. Teich, H. Puetter, K. Schierle-Arndt, J. Pastre, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 626 (2006). doi:10.1039/b511962f

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gonzalez, R.N. Devi, D.P. Tunstall, P.A. Cox, P.A. Wright, Microp. Mesop. Mater. 84, 97 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.04.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kim, H. Li, L.N. Rosi, O.M. Yaghi, M. Eddaoudi, Patent US2003004364, 2003

  15. J. Rowsell, E. Spencer, J. Eckert, J. Howard, O.M. Yaghi, Science 309, 1350 (2005). doi:10.1126/science.1113247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Rowsell, J. Eckert, O.M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14904 (2005). doi:10.1021/ja0542690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Rowsell, O.M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 1304 (2006). doi:10.1021/ja056639q

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. D.J. Tranchemontagne, J.R. Hunt, O.M. Yaghi, Tetrahedron 64, 8553 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. W.-J. Son, J. Kim, J. Kim, W.-S. Ahn, Chem. Commun. (Camb) 6336 (2008). doi:10.1039/b814740j

  20. S. Opelt, S. Turk, E. Dietzsch, A. Henschel, S. Kaskel, E. Klemm, Catal. Commun. 9, 1286 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.catcom.2007.11.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. B.E.P. Beeston, R.W. Horne, R. Markham, in Electron Diffraction and Optical Diffraction Techniques, ed. by Audrey M. Glauert (Amsterdam, 1972)

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge CICYT (Project ENE2006-06244) for financial support of this research work. MSS and MGO acknowledge Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for a Ramon-y-Cajal contract and a FPU contract, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Sánchez-Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calleja, G., Botas, J.A., Orcajo, M.G. et al. Differences between the isostructural IRMOF-1 and MOCP-L porous adsorbents. J Porous Mater 17, 91–97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-009-9268-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-009-9268-5

Keywords

Navigation