A test of the possible influence of seabird activity on the 210Pb flux in high Arctic ponds at Cape Vera, Devon Island, Nunavut: implications for radiochronology
- 147 Downloads
A large seabird colony of northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) at Cape Vera on Devon Island in the Canadian high Arctic has been shown to act as an effective biological pump, transporting large quantities of marine-derived nutrients and contaminants to the ponds beneath their nesting sites. Previous research has shown that seabirds also have the potential to elevate radionuclide concentrations in their immediate surroundings. Here, we assess the influence of the Cape Vera seabird colony on the 210Pb budgets of six affected ponds and one control site, and discuss potential implications with respect to 210Pb dating methodologies. In general, fluxes of 210Pb at Cape Vera were similar to, or less than, those measured at other Arctic locations not influenced by seabirds. Plots of unsupported 210Pb activity versus depth showed a number of non-monotonic features in all sediment cores, necessitating the use of the constant-rate-of-supply (CRS) model to derive age-depth profiles. We conclude that seabird activity has not dramatically increased the 210Pb flux to the ponds at Cape Vera. Overall, the low flux of excess 210Pb made accurate dating problematic for some of the study cores, necessitating the use of independent dating markers (e.g., 137Cs and PCB concentrations) to verify the reliability of the chronologies.
Keywords210Pb radiochronology Paleolimnology Arctic ponds Biovectors Northern fulmars Polychlorinated biphenyls Contaminants
This work was funded by Strategic and Discovery grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada awarded to JMB, MSVD, and JPS, and a Northern Scientific Training Program (NSTP) grant to BEK. We thank the Polar Continental Shelf Project/Étude du Plateau Continental Polaire (PCSP/ÉPCP), NSTP and Environment Canada (CWS) for financial and logistical support in the field. The quality of this manuscript was greatly improved by two anonymous reviewers. This represents PCSP/ÉPCP contribution No. 03207.
- Appleby PG (2001) Chronostratigraphic techniques in recent sediments. In: Last WM, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Volume 1: Basin analysis, coring, and chronological techniques. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 172–203Google Scholar
- Blais JM, Muir DCG (2001) Paleolimnological methods and applications for organic contaminants. In: Last B, Smol JP (eds) Developments in paleoenvironmental research, vol 2: physical and chemical approaches, chap 10. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 271–298Google Scholar
- Blais JM, Kimpe LE, McMahon D, Keatley B, Mallory ML, Douglas MSV, Smol JP (2005) Arctic seabirds transport marine-derived contaminants. Science 309:445. doi: 10.1126/science.1112658
- Gaston AJ, Mallory ML, Gilchrist HG, O’Donovan K (2006) Status, trends and attendance patterns of the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in Nunavut, Canada. Arctic 59:165–178Google Scholar
- Hermanson MH (1990) 210Pb and 137Cs chronology of sediments from small, shallow Arctic lakes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1443–1451Google Scholar
- Keatley BE (2007) Limnological and paleolimnological investigations of environmental change in three distinct ecosystem types, Canadian High Arctic. PhD Thesis, Queen’s University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 332 ppGoogle Scholar
- Lockhart WL, Stern G, Outridge P (2000) Mercury and other contaminants in a laminated sediment core from Devon Island. In: Kalhok S (ed) Synopsis of research carried out under the 1999–2000 northern contaminants program. Dept. of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, Canada, pp 104–112Google Scholar
- Michelutti N, Wolfe AP, Vinebrooke RD, Rivard B, Briner J (2005) Recent primary production increases in arctic lakes. Geophys Res Lett 32:L19715. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023693
- Michelutti N, Wolfe AP, Briner JP, Miller GH (2007) Climatically controlled chemical and biological development in Arctic lakes. J Geophys Res 112:G03002. doi: 10.1029/2006JG000396