Predicting the probability of successful efficacy of a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor from dose–response analysis
- 390 Downloads
PF-04171327 is a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR) being developed to retain anti-inflammatory efficacy while reducing unwanted effects. Our aim was to conduct a longitudinal dose–response analysis to identify the DAGR doses with efficacy similar to or greater than prednisone 10 mg once daily (QD). The data included were from a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in 323 subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis on a background of methotrexate. Subjects received DAGR 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg, prednisone 5 or 10 mg, or placebo QD for 8 weeks. The Disease Activity Score 28-4 calculated using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) was the efficacy endpoint utilized in this dose–response model. For DAGR, the maximum effect (Emax) on DAS28-4 CRP was estimated to be −1.2 points (95 % CI −1.7, −0.84), and the evaluated dose range provided 31–87 % of the Emax; for prednisone 5 and 10 mg, the estimated effects were −0.27 (95 % CI −0.55, 0.006) and −0.94 point (95 % CI −1.3, −0.59), respectively. Stochastic simulations indicated that the DAGR 1, 5, 10 and 15 mg have probabilities of 0.9, 29, 54 and 62 %, respectively, to achieve efficacy greater than prednisone 10 mg at week 8. DAGR 9 mg estimated probability was 50 % suggesting that DAGR ≥9 mg QD has an effect on DAS28-4 CRP comparable to or greater than prednisone 10 mg QD. This work informs dose selection for late-stage confirmatory trials.
KeywordsDissociated agonist of glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR) Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Longitudinal dose–response Stochastic simulations Disease activity score 28-4 C-reactive protein (DAS28-4 CRP) Phase 2 randomized double-blind clinical trial
DJC would like to acknowledge Gregory J. Hather (Pfizer Inc.) for his insightful comments on the statistical aspects. DJC also acknowledges William S. Denney (Pfizer Inc.) for his assistance with the R code. In addition, the authors would like to thank Jack Cook (Pfizer Inc.) for his valuable input to the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors are employees of Pfizer Inc. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc.
- 3.Centers for disease control and prevention. Rheumatoid arthritis. http://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/basics/rheumatoid.htm. Accessed Feb 2015
- 7.Criswell L, Saag K, Sems KM, Welch V, Shea B, Wells GA, Suarez-Almazor ME (2009) Moderate-term, low-dose corticosteroids for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1998)Google Scholar
- 8.Kirwan JR, Bijlsma JWJ, Boers M, Shea B (2009) Effects of glucocorticoids on radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Hu X, Du S, Tunca C, Braden T, Long KR, Lee J, Webb EG, Dietz JD, Hummert S, Rouw S, Hegde SG, Webber RK, Obukowicz MG (2011) The antagonists but not partial agonists of glucocorticoid receptor ligands show substantial side effect dissociation. Endocrinology 152(8):3123–3134. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1447 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.DAS28. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center. http://www.das-score.nl/das28/en/introduction-menu.html. Accessed Feb 2015
- 11.US FDA 2013 Guidance for Industry. Rheumatoid Arthritis: Developing Drug Products for Treatment. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM354468.pdf
- 12.American College of Rheumatology. 1987 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification. http://www.rheumatology.org/Content.aspx?id=17435. Accessed April 2015
- 13.R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- 14.Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, Bauer RJ. Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model Program (NONMEM) version 7.2.0, Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD, USA, 2011. http://www.iconplc.com/technology/products/nonmem
- 16.Anderson JK, Zimmerman L, Caplan L, Michaud K (2011) Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: Patient (PtGA) and Provider (PrGA) Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Disease Activity Score (DAS) and Disease Activity Score with 28-Joint Counts (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Activity Score (PAS) and Patient Activity Score-II (PASII), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID), Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 (RADAI-5), Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index (CASI), Patient-Based Disease Activity Score With ESR (PDAS1) and Patient-Based Disease Activity Score without ESR (PDAS2), and Mean Overall Index for Rheumatoid Arthritis (MOI-RA). Arthritis Care Res 63(Suppl 11):S14–S36. doi: 10.1002/acr.20621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Milligan PA, Brown MJ, Marchant B, Martin SW, van der Graaf PH, Benson N, Nucci G, Nichols DJ, Boyd RA, Mandema JW, Krishnaswami S, Zwillich S, Gruben D, Anziano RJ, Stock TC, Lalonde RL (2013) Model-based drug development: a rational approach to efficiently accelerate drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 93(6):502–514. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.54 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Dickson MC, Ellis J, Cai G, Wilson AG, Bridges SL, Furst DE, O’Dell JR, El-Gabalawy HS, Tiffany C, Sidiqqi S, Bal J, Uings IJ, Blinks MH, Rioja I (2008) Corticosteroid-responsive pharmacodynamic transcriptional markers: results from a randomised placebo-controlled study of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with prednisolone. https://acr.confex.com/acr/2008/webprogram/Paper2882.html. Paper presented at the American College of Rheumatology. Accessed Mar 2015
- 25.University of Missouri–Kansas City. Corticosteroid Conversion Table. http://med.umkc.edu/docs/em/Corticosteroid_Table.pdf. Accessed Mar 2015