A New Method to Classify Injury Severity by Diagnosis: Validation Using Workers’ Compensation and Trauma Registry Data
- 278 Downloads
Purpose Acute work-related trauma is a leading cause of death and disability among U.S. workers. Existing methods to estimate injury severity have important limitations. This study assessed a severe injury indicator constructed from a list of severe traumatic injury diagnosis codes previously developed for surveillance purposes. Study objectives were to: (1) describe the degree to which the severe injury indicator predicts work disability and medical cost outcomes; (2) assess whether this indicator adequately substitutes for estimating Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-based injury severity from workers’ compensation (WC) billing data; and (3) assess concordance between indicators constructed from Washington State Trauma Registry (WTR) and WC data. Methods WC claims for workers injured in Washington State from 1998 to 2008 were linked to WTR records. Competing risks survival analysis was used to model work disability outcomes. Adjusted total medical costs were modeled using linear regression. Information content of the severe injury indicator and AIS-based injury severity measures were compared using Akaike Information Criterion and R2. Results Of 208,522 eligible WC claims, 5 % were classified as severe. Among WC claims linked to the WTR, there was substantial agreement between WC-based and WTR-based indicators (kappa = 0.75). Information content of the severe injury indicator was similar to some AIS-based measures. The severe injury indicator was a significant predictor of WTR inclusion, early hospitalization, compensated time loss, total permanent disability, and total medical costs. Conclusions Severe traumatic injuries can be directly identified when diagnosis codes are available. This method provides a simple and transparent alternative to AIS-based injury severity estimation.
KeywordsInjury severity Trauma severity indices ICDPIC Occupational injuries Workers’ compensation Work disability ICD-9-CM
This study was funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Grant Numbers 1R03OH009883 and 1R21OH010307. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH. Authors Sears, Bowman, and Hogg-Johnson have no commercial interest related to this research. Author Rotert receives teaching honoraria from the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, originators of the Abbreviated Injury Scale.
- 1.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Workplace Safety and Health Topics: Traumatic Occupational Injuries. [cited May 17, 2014]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/injury/.
- 12.Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The abbreviated injury scale, 1990 revision. Des Plaines, IL: AAAM; 1990.Google Scholar
- 14.Cryer C, Langley J. Developing indicators of injury incidence that can be used to monitor global, regional and local trends. 2008 [cited May 2, 2014]; Available from: http://ipru3.otago.ac.nz/ipru/ReportsPDFs/OR070.pdf.
- 15.National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Expert Group on Injury Severity Measurement. Discussion document on injury severity measurement in administrative datasets. 2004 [cited February 11, 2014]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/injury/DicussionDocu.pdf.
- 19.Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):922–5 (discussion 5–6).Google Scholar
- 20.Meredith JW, Evans G, Kilgo PD, MacKenzie E, Osler T, McGwin G, et al. A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality. J Trauma. 2002;53(4):621–8 (discussion 8–9).Google Scholar
- 21.Kilgo PD, Osler TM, Meredith W. The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring. J Trauma. 2003;55(4):599–606 (discussion -7).Google Scholar
- 27.Clark DE, Osler TM, Hahn DR. ICDPIC: Stata module to provide methods for translating International Classification of Diseases (Ninth Revision) diagnosis codes into standard injury categories and/or scores. 2010 [cited March 2, 2012]; Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457028.html.
- 29.State of Washington. RCW Title 51: Chapter 51.12. Employments and occupations covered. [cited March 10, 2014]; Available from: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?Cite=51.12.
- 30.National Trauma Data Bank. National Trauma Data Standard: Data Dictionary. 2012 Admissions. 2011 [cited August 27, 2012]; Available from: http://www.ntdsdictionary.org/dataElements/documents/NTDS2012_xsd.PDF.
- 34.Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Occupational Health Indicators: A guide for tracking occupational health conditions and their determinants. 2014 March 2014 [cited March 24, 2014]; Available from: www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/OHIndicators/2014EditionOHIGuidanceManual.pdf.
- 35.Thomsen C, McClain J, Rosenman K, Davis L. Indicators for occupational health surveillance. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007;56(RR-1):1–7.Google Scholar
- 36.Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Occupational Health Indicators. [cited March 24, 2014]; Available from: http://www.cste.org/?OHIndicators.
- 40.Cleves M, Gutierrez RG, Gould W, Marchenko YV. An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. 3rd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2010.Google Scholar