Early and Late Return to Work After Sick Leave: Predictors in a Cohort of Sick-Listed Individuals with Common Mental Disorders
- 759 Downloads
Objectives The study aims to identify individual and workplace factors associated with early return to work (RTW)—defined as within 3 months—and factors associated with later RTW—between 3 and 12 months after being sick-listed—in a cohort of newly sick-listed individuals with common mental disorders. Methods In a prospective cohort study, a cross-sectional analysis was performed on baseline measures of patients granted sick leave due to common mental disorders. A total of 533 newly sick-listed individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. A baseline questionnaire was sent by post within 3 weeks of their first day of certified medical sickness; 354 (66 %) responded. Those who were unemployed were excluded, resulting in a study population of 319 individuals. Sick leave was recorded for each individual from the Social Insurance Office during 1 year. Analyses were made with multiple Cox regression analyses. Results Early RTW was associated with lower education, better work ability at baseline, positive expectations of treatment and low perceived interactional justice with the supervisor. RTW after 3 months was associated with a need to reduce demands at work, and turnover intentions. Conclusions Early RTW among sick-listed individuals with common mental disorders seems to be associated with the individual’s need to secure her/his employment situation, whereas later RTW is associated with variables reflecting dissatisfaction with work conditions. No health measures were associated with RTW. The study highlights the importance of considering not only health and functioning, but also workplace conditions and relations at the workplace in implementing RTW interventions.
KeywordsCommon mental disorders Return to work Work conditions Sick leave duration
We thank Henrik Magnusson for skilful statistical analyses. The study was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE), and the County Council of Ostergotland, Sweden.
Conflict of interest
Author Kerstin Ekberg declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Charlotte Wåhlin declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Jan Persson declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Lars Bernfort declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Birgitta Öberg declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- 1.Social Insurance in Figures. Stockholm, Social Insurance Office; 2004.Google Scholar
- 5.OECD. Sick on the job? Myths and realities about mental health at work. 2011. http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/sickonthejob2011.htm.
- 7.Lagerveld SE, Bültmann U, Francche RL, van Dijk FJH, Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Conelis CM, Bruinvels DJ, Huijs JJJM, Blonk RWB, van der Klink JJL, Nieuwenhuijsen K. Factors associated with work participation and work functioning in depressed workers: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:275–92.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Borritz M, Christensen KB, Bultmann U, Rugulies R, Lund T, Andersen I, Villadsen E, Diderichsen F, Kristensen TS. Impact of burnout and psychosocial work characteristics on future long-term sickness absence. Prospective results of the Danish PUMA Study among human service workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(10):964–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Furlan AD, Gnam WH, Carnide N, Irvin E, Amick III BC, De Rango K, et al. Systematic review of intervention practices for depression in the work place. Canada: Institute of Work and Health, February 2011. http://www.iwh.on.ca/sys-reviews/workplace-depression-interventions.
- 30.Shirom A, Melamed S, Toker S, Berliner S, Shapira I. Burnout and health review: current knowledge and future research directions. In: Hodgkinson GP, Ford JK, editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 20. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 2005. p. 269–309.Google Scholar
- 34.Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work ability index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1994.Google Scholar
- 46.Strindlund L, Ekberg K. Employees at the county council of Östergötland on long-term sick leave. Diagnoses, work conditions and needs for rehabilitation interventions. IHS, Linkoping University, report 2004:1. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
- 49.Bertilsson M. Work capacity and mental health: the phenomena and their importance in return to work. Dissertation. Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. 2014.Google Scholar
- 52.Argyris C. Understanding organizational behavior. Michigan: Dorsey Press; 1960.Google Scholar