Supervisor Competencies for Supporting Return to Work: A Mixed-Methods Study
Purpose Line supervisors often play an important role in the return to work (RTW) process; whether they possess the competencies needed to carry out this work effectively is unknown. The aim of this research was to determine the competencies supervisors need in order to facilitate a worker’s RTW following absence due to a mental health condition or a musculoskeletal disorder. Methods Supervisors from five Australian industries with high rates of compensable claims participated in focus groups to elicit the knowledge, skills, and personal characteristics required to support returning workers. From a multi-stage analysis of responses, RTW competencies were developed, allocated to clusters of related items, and incorporated into an online survey administered to rehabilitation professionals. Results 29 supervisors participated in 1 of 5 focus groups. Analysis of focus group data identified 84 generic competencies, eight specific to mental health conditions, and two to musculoskeletal disorders, arranged in 11 clusters. Survey respondents (n = 344) represented a variety of rehabilitation professionals and jurisdictions. Nearly all agreed that supervisors should receive training to support RTW. Over 50 % of respondents rated 90 of 94 competencies as very important or essential. The highest ratings were for competencies relating to personal attributes, knowledge of RTW processes, and empathetic support of the worker. Conclusions Supervisors and rehabilitation professionals perceive effective support of RTW requires supervisors to have a range of knowledge, skills, and personal characteristics. Our competency model should undergo workplace testing to evaluate its validity.
KeywordsReturn to work Competency Supervisors Mental health Musculoskeletal disorder Training
The researchers would like to acknowledge the support of WorkSafe Victoria and the Transport Accident Commission (TAC), through the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research ISCRR). We are grateful for the support of the organizations whose staff willingly gave their time and experiences to participate in this research. We would also like to thank Dr. Shelley Allen who served as the independent qualitative researcher and subject matter expert.
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
- 7.Campbell Research and Consulting. Australia and New Zealand return to work monitor 2011/12. Clifton Hill: Heads of Workers Compensation Authorities. http://www.hwca.org.au/. Accessed 1 Sept 2013.
- 14.Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Training to optimize the response of supervisors to work injuries—needs assessment, design, and evaluation. AAOHN J. 2006;54:1–10.Google Scholar
- 16.Safe Work Australia. Compendium of workers’ compensation statistics, Australia, 2010–11. Commonweaith of Australia. 2013. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/766/Compendium 2010-11.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2013.
- 17.Safe Work Australia. The incidence of accepted workers’ compensation claims for mental stress in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia. 2013. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/769/The-Incidence-Accepted-WC-Claims-Mental-Stress-Australia.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2013.
- 18.Comcare. Unhappiness at work—too difficult to overcome? Commonwealth of Australia. 2012. http://www.comcare.gov.au/news__and__media/media_centre/unhappiness_at_work_-_too_difficult_to_overcome. Accessed 2 Sept 2013.
- 19.Safe Work Australia. Compendium of workers’ compensation statistics, Australia, 2008–09. Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/570/Compendium_Workers_Compensation_Statistics_2008-09.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2013.
- 21.Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.Google Scholar
- 22.Yarker J, Donaldson-Feilder E, Lewis R, Flaxman PE. Management competencies for preventing and reducing stress at work: identifying and developing the management behaviours necessary to implement the HSE Management Standards. London: HSE Books; 2007.Google Scholar
- 24.Australian Safety and Compensation Council. Work-related mental disorders in Australia. Commonweaith of Australia. 2005. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/416/Workrelated_Mental_Disorders_Australia.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2013.
- 25.Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
- 26.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Small business in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia. 2001. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/1321.0. Accessed 19 May 2013.
- 27.Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Recruiting focus group participants and designing the interview guide. Focus groups: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
- 29.Holtzblatt K, Jones S. Contextual inquiry: a participatory technique for system design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A, editors. Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993. p. 177–210.Google Scholar
- 34.Haafkens JA, Kopnina H, Meerman MGM, van Dijk FJ. Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/104 (cited 21 July 2013).
- 36.Holloway I. A–Z of qualitative research in healthcare. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008.Google Scholar
- 37.Hannes K. Chapter 4: critical appraisal of qualitative research. In: Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group, editors. Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. 2011. http://cqim.cochrane.org/supplemental-handbook-guidance. Accessed 27 Feb 2014.