Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 111–124 | Cite as

How Well Do We Report on Compensation Systems in Studies of Return to Work: A Systematic Review

  • Fiona J. Clay
  • Janneke Berecki-Gisolf
  • Alex Collie
Review

Abstract

Purpose Occupational injury and work-related disability is a significant public health problem. For published research to provide a collective knowledge base for return to work (RTW) policy and practice, features of the compensation system relevant to the research must be described clearly. The level of the reporting on compensation system features is yet to be established. The aim of the present study was to synthesize the evidence for the reporting on compensation systems in prognostic studies of RTW following work-related injuries. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Ovid Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published 1996–2011. Included studies were prognostic studies of RTW or work disability following work-related acute traumatic injuries. Results The initial search yielded 952 articles; 37 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were based on clinical practice; eight studies were based on administrative data. Only two studies reported seven or more compensation features and two studies reported four to six. The majority of studies (19/37) did not report on any aspect of the compensation system that study participants were interacting with. The most common information reported was the extent of coverage at the population level (7/37) and the availability of wage replacement entitlements (7/37). The name of the compensation system was provided in 5 studies. Conclusions Overall reporting on compensation systems in prognostic studies of RTW needs to be improved if research evidence is to inform policy and practice. Compensation system features that could be reported are provided.

Keywords

Workers compensation systems Traumatic injuries Return to work Reporting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the following key researchers for providing opinion on the reporting on compensation systems in research studies. Genevieve Grant, Robert Guthrie, Rebbecca Lilley, Katherine Lippel, Kevin Purse, Jeanne Sears. The authors acknowledge assistance from Adrian Buzgau and Andrew Palagyi in regards to data storage. All authors receive research funding from the Transport Accident Commission and WorkSafe Victoria. Neither funder had any involvement in the study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

All human studies included in this review have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, et al. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    OECD. Transforming disability into ability. Polices to promote work and income security for disabled people. OECD; 2003. OECD Code 812003021P1; ISBN: 92-641-988-73.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urquhart DM, Williamson OD, Gabbe BJ, Cicuttini FM, Cameron PA, et al. Outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to level 1 trauma centres. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76:600–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williamson OD, Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Edwards ER, Richardson MD. Predictors of moderate or severe pain 6 months after orthopaedic injury: a prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:139–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vles WJ, Steyerberg EW, Essink-Bot ML, et al. Prevalence and determinants of disabilities and return to work after major trauma. J Trauma. 2005;58:126–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruseckaite R, Gabbe B, Vogel AP, Collie A. Health care utilisation following hospitalisation for transport-related injury. Injury. 2012;43(9):1600–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    WorkSafe Victoria statistical summary 2011–2012. Available from http://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/about-worksafe-victoria/statistics [cited 2013].
  8. 8.
    Waddell G, Burton A. Is work good for your health and well-being?. London: The Stationery Office; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Black C. Working for a healthier tomorrow Review of the Health of Britains Working Age Population. TSO London; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Australasian Faculty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Australian and New Zealand Consensus statement. Realising the health benefits of work. The Royal Australian College of Physicians, Sydney. Available from www.racp.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=5E3445A1-E478-2539 [cited 2012].
  11. 11.
    Harrison K, Allen S. Features of occupational rehabilitation systems in Australia: a map through the maze. Work. 2003;21(141–52):35.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41:787–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boake C, McCauley SR, Pedroza C, Levin HS, Brown SA, et al. Lost productive work time after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury with and without hospitalization. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:994–1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bruyns CNP, Jaquet J-B, Schreuders TAR, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PDL, et al. Predictors for return to work in patients with median and ulnar nerve injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:28–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burnham RS, Warren SA, Saboe LA, Davis LA, Russell GG, et al. Factors predicting employment 1 year after traumatic spine fracture. Spine. 1996;21:1066–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang J-H, Wu M, Lee C-L, Guo Y-L, Chiu H-Y. Correlation of return to work outcomes and hand impairment measures among workers with traumatic hand injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:9–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clay FJ, Newstead SV, Watson WL, McClure RJ. Determinants of return to work following non life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma: a prospective cohort study. J Rehab Med. 2010;42:162–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clay FJ, Newstead SV, Watson WL, Ozanne-Smith J, McClure RJ. Bio-psychosocial determinants of time lost from work following non life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clay FJ, Newstead SV, D’Elia A, McClure RJ. First return to work following injury: does it reflect a composite or a homogeneous outcome? Occup Environ Med. 2010;67:730–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Du C-L, Lai C-F, Wang J-D. Delayed return-to-work in workers after non-severe occupational upper extremity fracture in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106:887–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dunn WR, Lincoln AE, Hinton RY, Smith GS, Amoroso PJ. Occupational disability after hospitalization for the treatment of an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(9):1656–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fan JK, McLeod CB, Koehoorn M. Sociodemographic, clinical, and work characteristics associated with return-to-work outcomes following surgery for work-related knee injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:332–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gross DP, Battie MC. Recovery expectations predict recovery in workers with back pain but not other musculoskeletal conditions. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:451–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He Y, Hu J, Yu I, Gu W, Liang Y. Determinants of return to work after occupational injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:378–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hebert JS, Ashworth NL. Predictors of return to work following traumatic work-related lower extremity amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:613–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hepp U, Moergeli H, Buchi S, Bruchhaus-Steinert H, Sensky T, et al. The long-term prediction of return to work following serious accidental injuries: a follow up study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:53.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holtslag HR, Post MW, van der Werken C, Lindeman E. Return to work after major trauma. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:373–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hou W-H, Tsauo J-Y, Lin C-H, Liang H-W, Du C-L. Worker’s compensation and return-to-work following orthopaedic injury to extremities. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:440–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jaquet J-B, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PDL, Hofman A, Passchier J, et al. Early psychological stress after forearm nerve injuries: a predictor for long-term functional outcome and return to productivity. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jaquet JB, Luijsterburg AJ, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PD, Hofman A, et al. Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma. 2001;51:687–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lange C, Burgmer M, Braunheim M, Heuft G. Prospective analysis of factors associated with work reentry in patients with accident-related injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee Y-Y, Chang J-H, Shieh S-J, Lee Y-C, Kuo L-C, et al. Association between the initial anatomical severity and opportunity of return to work in occupational hand injured patients. J Trauma. 2010;69:E88–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    MacDermid J, Roth J, McMurtry R. Predictors of time lost from work following a distal radius fracture. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:47–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    MacKenzie EJ, Morris JA Jr, Jurkovich GJ, Yasui Y, Cushing BM, et al. Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1630–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mason S, Wardrope J, Turpin G, Rowlands A. Outcomes after injury: a comparison of workplace and nonworkplace injury. J Trauma. 2002;53:98–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meerding WJ, Looman CWN, Essink-Bot M-L, Toet H, Mulder S, et al. Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma. 2004;56:150–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Murphy GC, Young AE, Brown DJ, King NJ. Explaining labor force status following spinal cord injury: the contribution of psychological variables. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:276–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Murphy G, Brown D, Athanasou J, Foreman P, Young A. Labour force participation and employment among a sample of Australian patients with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:238–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Opsteegh L, Reinders-Messelink HA, Schollier D, Groothoff JW, Postema K, et al. Determinants of return to work in patients with hand disorders and hand injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:245–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reynolds S, Paniak C, Toller-Lobe G, Nagy J. A longitudinal study of compensation-seeking and return to work in a treated mild traumatic brain injury sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18:139–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Richmond TS, Amsterdam JD, Guo W, et al. The effect of post-injury depression on return to pre-injury function: a prospective cohort study. Psychol Med. 2009;39:1709–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Dahlin LB. Prospective study of patients with injuries to the hand and forearm: costs, function, and general health. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39:360–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rusch MD, Dzwierzynski WW, Sanger JR. Return to work outcomes after work-related hand trauma: the role of causal attributions. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:673–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schnyder U, Moergeli H, Klaghofer R. Does patient cognition predict time off from work after life-threatening accidents? Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:2025–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seland K, Cherry N, Beach J. A study of factors influencing return to work after wrist or ankle fractures. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49:197–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Webster BS, Verma S, Willetts J, Hopcia K, Wasiak R. Association of disability duration with physical therapy services provided after meniscal surgery in a workers’ compensation population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1542–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wong JYP. Time off work in hand injury patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:718–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang Z, Lowe AJ, de la Harpe DE, Richardson MD. Factors that predict poor outcomes in patients with traumatic vertebral body fractures. Injury. 2010;41:226–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Young AE, Wasiak R, Webster BS, Shayne RG. Urban-rural differences in work disability after an occupational injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34:158–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Menard MR. Comparison of disability behavior after different sites and types of injury in a workers’ compensation population. J Occup Environ Med. 1996;38:1161–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jacobs D. Low public expenditure on social welfare: do East Asian countries have a secret? Int J Soc Welfare. 2000;9:2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Williamson OD, Edwards ER, Graves SE, et al. The relationship between compensable status and long-term patient outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. Med J Aust. 2007;187:14–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Harris I, Mulford J, Solomon M, et al. Association between compensation status and outcome after surgery: a metaanalysis. JAMA. 2005;293:1644–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and commissions. Available from www.iaiabc.com [cited 2012].
  56. 56.
    SafeWork Australia Comparison of Workers’ Compensation Arrangements in Australia and New Zealand. 2012. Available from www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/ [cited 2012].
  57. 57.
    Australian and New Zealand Consensus Statement on the Use of Research Evidence in Compensation Policy and Practice. Available from www.iscrr.com.au/.../Final%20Consensus%20Statement_15%20Feb%... [cited 2012].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona J. Clay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Janneke Berecki-Gisolf
    • 2
  • Alex Collie
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery ResearchMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Injury Outcomes Research Unit, Monash Injury Research InstituteMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations