How do Older Employees with Health Problems Remain Productive at Work?: A Qualitative Study
- 633 Downloads
Purpose The goal of this qualitative study was to gain insight into how older employees remain productive at work in spite of health problems. Methods Twenty-six semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with older employees, 46–63 years of age, who reported a poor health in the Study on Transitions in Employment, Ability, and Motivation. Demographic, health, and work information was gathered, followed by information on adjustments made in response to health problems. Inductive and deductive analyses were done independently by two researchers. Results Four pathways through which poor health could influence productivity were identified: (1) poor health did not influence productivity; (2) poor health created a temporary imbalance in demands and external and internal resources after which adjustments were made and productivity was maintained; (3) adjustments were made in response to an imbalance, but productivity remained reduced; and (4) no adjustments were made and productivity was reduced. Whether and which adjustments occurred was influenced by factors in various domains, such as: visibility of the problem (health), autonomy (work-related), support (relational), and the ability to ask for help (personal). Sustainable productivity was influenced by internal factors that enhanced or hindered the creation of a balance, and by whether appropriate adjustments were made. Conclusions The influence that health can have on productivity depends on the individuals’ unique imbalance and personal disposition. Helpful a priori work place characteristics and personal well-being should be promoted so that a balance between demands and resources can be found in times of poor health.
KeywordsProductivity Poor health Adjustments Barriers and facilitators Qualitative research
We thank interns Kerstin Reeuwijk and Hanneke van der Vijfeijke for their contributions in transcribing, analyzing, and discussing findings.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.European commission: Employment, social affairs and inclusion: EU launches public debate on the future of pensions. (2011). Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=839. Accessed 3 July 2012.
- 2.Hagan R, Jones AM, Rice N. Health and retirement in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6:2672–95.Google Scholar
- 7.van den Heuvel SG, Geuskens GA, Hooftman WE, Koppes LL. van den Bossche SN. Productivity loss at work: Health-related and work-related factors. J Occup Rehabil; 2010. p. 339.Google Scholar
- 9.van den Berg T, Elders LAM, de Zwart BCH, Burdorf A. The effects of work-related and individual factors on the work ability index: A systematic review. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:211–20.Google Scholar
- 12.Bakker AB. Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J Manage Psychol; 2007. p. 328.Google Scholar
- 16.Ybema JF, Geuskens GA, van den Heuvel SG. Study on transitions in employment, ability, and motivation (STREAM): Methodologie en eerste resultaten. Hoofddorp: TNO; 2011.Google Scholar
- 17.Ware JE Jr, Kosinksi M, Keller SD. A 12 item short form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validityA 12 item short form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
- 21.World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of diseases (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2010.Google Scholar
- 22.International Labour Organization. International standard classification of occupations (ISCO); 2008.Google Scholar
- 24.de Graaf R, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S, ten Have M. Comparing the effects on work performance of mental and physical disorders. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2012 (accepted).Google Scholar
- 25.Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar