Is Mobility in the Labor Market a Solution to Sustainable Return to Work for Some Sick Listed Persons?
- 298 Downloads
Aim: The study aims to identify characteristics associated with long-term expectations of professional stability or mobility among recently sick-listed workers, and to study whether expectations of professional mobility and turnover intentions were associated with duration of sick leave. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on baseline measures in a prospective cohort study of patients who were granted sick leave due to musculoskeletal (MSD) or mental (MD) disorders. A total of 1,375 individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A baseline questionnaire was sent by mail within 3 weeks of their first day of certified medical sickness; 962 individuals responded (70%). The main diagnosis was MSD in 595 (62%) individuals and MD in 367 (38%). Results: Expectations of ability to remain in the present profession in 2 years was associated with better health and health-related resources, younger age, higher education, and better effort—reward balance. Effort-reward imbalance, MD, high burnout scores, and better educational and occupational position were associated with turnover intentions. Low expectations of ability to remain in the present profession defined two vulnerable groups with regard to RTW, those with no turnover intentions were older, had lower personal resources, more often had MSD, and slower RTW rate. Those with turnover intentions had a clear effort-reward imbalance and high burnout scores. Conclusions: The results of this explorative study underline the importance of differentiating RTW-interventions based on knowledge about the sick-listed person’s resources in relation to the labor market and the work place, and their expectations of future employment and employability.
KeywordsReturn to work Expectations Job stability Turnover intention Return to work Survival curves
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS) and from the County Council of Östergötland. We thank Henrik Magnusson for statistical analyses.
- 1.Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Öberg B. Professional reasoning in occupational health service for patients with musculoskeletal and mental disorders. Sweden: Linköping University; 2011. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- 6.Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010; Nov 6. Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
- 8.Stahl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. Swedish rehabilitation professionals’ perspectives on work ability assessments in a changing sickness insurance system. Disabil Rehabil. 2010. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.532282.
- 10.Shirom A, Melamed S, Toker S, Berliner S, Shapira I. Burnout and health review: current knowledge and future research directions. In: Hodgkinson GP, Ford JK, editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 20. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 2005. p. 269–309.Google Scholar
- 12.Heymans MW, de Vet HC, Knol DL, Bongers PM, Koes BW, van Mechelen W. Workers’ beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):685–95.Google Scholar
- 13.Reiso H, Nygard JF, Jorgensen GS, Holanger R, Soldal D,Bruusgaard D. Back to work: predictors of return to work among patients with back disorders certified as sick: a two-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1468–73; discussion 1473–4.Google Scholar
- 19.Blackman I, Chiveralls K. Factors influencing workplace supervisor readiness to engage in workplace-based vocational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9297-1.
- 26.Tuomi K, Ilmarinen I, Jahkola A, Katajarime L, Tulkki A. Work ability index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1994.Google Scholar
- 30.The EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16:199–208.Google Scholar
- 31.Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. Discussion paper. Center for Health Economics, University of York; 1995.Google Scholar
- 43.Aronsson G, Dallner M, Gustafsson K. Yrkes-och arbetsplatsinlåsning. En empirisk studie av omfattning och hälsokonsekvenser (Locked-in in job and work place. An empirical study of extent and health effects). Arbete och Hälsa. 2000;5:1–24.Google Scholar
- 44.Mörtvik R, Rautio K. Jakten på superarbetskraften fortsätter! TCO granskar. (The Swedish Confederation for Professional Employees, TCO). Stockholm: TCO; 2008. p. 12.Google Scholar
- 45.Kaye HS, Jans LH, Jones EC. Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? J Occup Rehabil. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9302-8.