Abstract
Introduction Assessing work ability and sickness certification are considered problematic by many physicians and education and implementation of guidelines to improve knowledge and skills has been requested. Our aim was to study the association between such interventions and physicians’ sick-listing practices. Methods A web-based questionnaire was sent to all physicians working in primary care, psychiatry, orthopedics/rheumatology in the southern region of Sweden before (in 2007 to 1,063 physicians) and after (in 2009 to 1,164 physicians) educational interventions in insurance medicine were offered. Results With a response rate of 58%, half of the physicians (51%) reported to work at a clinic with a sick-listing policy in 2009 compared with 31% in 2007. Primary care physicians (OR 12.4) and physicians who had participated in educational interventions in insurance medicine (OR 2.4) more often had a sick-listing policy at the clinic. Physicians with a longer medical experience (OR 0.7) and those with support at the clinic (OR 0.3) and the possibility to extend time if needed (OR 0.4) were less likely to report of problematic cases while primary care physicians were (OR 2.9). On the contrary, physicians who reported to rarely have the possibility to extend time when handling problematic cases were more likely to issue a higher number of sickness certificates. Conclusions The sick-listing process is often viewed as problematic and more often by primary care physicians. Benchmarking and education in insurance medicine together with the possibility to allocate extra time if encountering problematic cases may facilitate sick-listing practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stone DA. Physicians as gatekeepers: illness certification as a rationing device. Public Policy. 1979;27(2):227–54.
Arrelov B, Alexanderson K, Hagberg J, Lofgren A, Nilsson G, Ponzer S. Dealing with sickness certification—a survey of problems and strategies among general practitioners and orthopaedic surgeons. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(147):273.
Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Mottram S, Main CJ, Dunn KM. Identification of UK sickness certification rates, standardised for age and sex. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(564):510–6.
Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135(1–2):187–95.
Persson G, Danielsson M, Rosen M, Alexanderson K, Lundberg O, Lundgren B, et al. Health in Sweden: the National Public Health Report 2005. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2006;67:3–10.
Tellnes G. Days lost by sickness certification. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1989;7(4):245–51.
Wahlstrom R, Alexanderson K. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 11. Physicians’ sick-listing practices. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:222–55.
Swartling MS, Alexanderson KA, Wahlstrom RA. Barriers to good sickness certification—an interview study with Swedish general practitioners. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(4):408–14.
von Knorring M, Sundberg L, Lofgren A, Alexanderson K. Problems in sickness certification of patients: a qualitative study on views of 26 physicians in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(1):22–8.
Ilmarinen J. Work ability–a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(1):1–5.
Norrmen G, Svardsudd K, Andersson DK. How primary health care physicians make sick listing decisions: the impact of medical factors and functioning. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:3.
Stigmar K, Grahn B, Ekdahl C. Work ability–experiences and perceptions among physicians. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(21):1780–9.
Money A, Hussey L, Thorley K, Turner S, Agius R. Work-related sickness absence negotiations: GPs’ qualitative perspectives. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(579):721–8.
Hussey S, Hoddinott P, Wilson P, Dowell J, Barbour R. Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland. BMJ. 2004;328(7431):88.
Lofgren A, Hagberg J, Arrelov B, Ponzer S, Alexanderson K. Frequency and nature of problems associated with sickness certification tasks: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 5455 physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(3):178–85.
Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, Dunn KM. Sickness certification and the GP: what really happens in practice? Fam Pract. 2010;27(3):344–50.
Roope R, Parker G, Turner S. General practitioners’ use of sickness certificates. Occup Med (Lond). 2009;59(8):580–5.
Englund L, Tibblin G, Svardsudd K. Variations in sick-listing practice among male and female physicians of different specialities based on case vignettes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000;18(1):48–52.
Norrmen G, Svardsudd K, Andersson D. Impact of physician-related factors on sickness certification in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24(2):104–9.
Swartling MS, Hagberg J, Alexanderson K, Wahlstrom RA. Sick-listing as a psychosocial work problem: a survey of 3997 Swedish physicians. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):398–408.
Gerner U, Alexanderson K. Issuing sickness certificates: a difficult task for physicians: a qualitative analysis of written statements in a Swedish survey. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37(1):57–63.
Socialstyrelsen (The National Board of Health and Welfare). Försäkringsmedicinskt beslutstöd (National Guidelines). Available from http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/riktlinjer/forsakringsmedicinsktbeslutsstod.
Alexanderson KA. Läkares arbete med sjukskrivning (Physician’s sick-listing practice). Report 2009, Karolinska Institutet. 2009.
Altman C. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
Reed P. The medical disability advisor. Workplace guidelines for disability duration. Singapore: Reed group holdings Ltd.; 2004.
Reed M, Devers K, Landon B. Physicians and care management: more acceptance than you think. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2003; (60):1–4.
Satterlee WG, Eggers RG, Grimes DA. Effective medical education: insights from the Cochrane library. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63(5):329–33.
Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O’Brien MA, Wolf F, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online). 2009; (2): CD003030.
Lofgren A, Hagberg J, Alexanderson K. What physicians want to learn about sickness certification: analyses of questionnaire data from 4019 physicians. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:61.
Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, Dunn KM. What do GPs feel about sickness certification? A systematic search and narrative review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(2):67–75.
Soderberg E, Alexanderson K. Sickness certification practices of physicians: a review of the literature. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(6):460–74.
Alexanderson K, Brommels M, Ekenvall L, Karlsryd E, Löfgren A, Sundberg L, et al. Problem inom hälso- och sjukvården kring handläggning av patienters sjukskrivning. (Problems in health care regarding management of patietns’ sickness certification). Stockholm, Karolonska Institutet. 2005.
Hamberg K, Risberg G, Johansson EE. Male and female physicians show different patterns of gender bias: a paper-case study of management of irritable bowel syndrome. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(2):144–52.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to all physicians who answered the questionnaire. We would also like to thank Louise Roberts and Ronny Wain for excellent technical support with the web based questionnaire and Ulf Hallgårde for valuable input and support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bremander, A.B., Hubertsson, J., Petersson, I.F. et al. Education and Benchmarking Among Physicians May Facilitate Sick-Listing Practice. J Occup Rehabil 22, 78–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9321-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9321-5