Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Receiving Treatment and Labor Force Activity in a Community Survey of People with Anxiety and Affective Disorders

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Standard treatments for depression and anxiety disorders are generally expected to benefit individuals, employers, and the wider community through improvements in work-functioning and productivity. Although some evidence supports expectations of treatment benefits, these are rarely examined at a population level. Methods We investigated receiving treatment, labor force activity, and self-reported work performance among people with ICD-10 affective and anxiety disorders. Data were collected by the Australian Bureau of Statistics using representative multistage sampling strategies. This large household probability sample consisted of 37,580 working age individuals. A secondary analysis was conducted using multiple binary logistic regression. Results After statistically controlling for eight covariates: extent of employment restrictions; mental health status; age; sex; partner status; country of birth; age left school; and educational attainment; receiving treatment was consistently associated with non-participation in the labor force, and was negatively associated with work performance. Conclusions At a population level, receiving treatment for anxiety and depression was negatively associated with being employed or looking for work. This could be an unintended side effect of treatment, although other explanations are also possible. These results justify more specific longitudinal investigations into how different forms of mental health treatment influence labor force activity among working age community residents with anxiety and affective disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conti DJ, Burton WN. The economic impact of depression in a workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 1994;36:983–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lerner D, Adler DA, Chang H, et al. Unemployment, job retention, and productivity loss among employees with depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55:1371–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Hahn SR, Morganstein D. Cost of lost productive work time among US workers with depression. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:3135–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen P. For the employer productivity is critical. Healthc Pap. 2004;5:95–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berndt ER, Finkelstein SN, Greenberg PE, Howland RH, Keith A. Workplace performance effects from chronic depression and its treatment. J Health Econ. 1998;17:511–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewa C, Lin E. Chronic physical illness, psychiatric disorder and disability in the workplace. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:41–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim D, Sanderson K, Andrews G. Lost productivity among full-time workers with mental disorders. J Mental Health Policy Econ. 2000;3:139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrews G, Henderson S, Hall W. Prevalence, co-morbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian national mental health survey. Brit J Psychiatr. 2001;178:145–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barlow DH (editor). Clinical handbook of psychological disorders. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 1993. Chap. 1–5.

  10. Andrews G, Hunt C. Treatments that work in anxiety disorders. Med J Aust. 1995;168:628–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waghorn G, Chant D, Lloyd C. Labor force activity among Australians with musculoskeletal disorders comorbid with depression and anxiety disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:241–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrews G, Hall W, Teesson M, Henderson S. The mental health of Australians. National survey of mental health and wellbeing. Report 2. Canberra: Mental Health Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care; 1999.

  13. Bijl RV, de Graaf R, Hiripi E, et al. The prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders in five countries. Health Aff. 2003;22:122–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Henderson S, Andrews G, Hall W. Australia’s mental health: an overview of the general population survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatr. 2000;33:197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katon WJ, Unutzer J, Simon G. Treatment of depression in primary care. Where are we, where can we go? Med Care 2004;42(12):1153–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nathan PE, Gorman JM. (editors) A guide to treatments that work. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang PS, Berglund P, Kessler RC. Recent care of mental disorders in the United States. Prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:284–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoenbaum M, Unutzer J, McCaffery D, Duan N, Sherbourne C, Wells KB. The effects of primary care depression treatment on patients’ clinical status and employment. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1145–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang M, Rost K, Fortney J, Smith R. A community study of depression treatment and employment. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:1209–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kessler R, Frank G. The impact of psychiatric disorders on work loss days. Psychol Med. 1997;27:861–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Waghorn G, Chant D. Labor force activity by people with depression and anxiety disorders: a population level second order analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;112:415–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Waghorn G, Chant D. Work performance among Australians with anxiety and depression: a population level second order analysis. J Nerv Mental Dis. 2006;194(12):898–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Survey of disability, ageing and carers, Australia. Technical paper. Confidentialised unit record file 1998. Canberra: Commonwealth Government; 1999.

  24. Waghorn G, Chant D, White P, Whiteford H. Disability, employment and work performance among persons with ICD-10 anxiety disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatr. 2005;39:55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases, 10th ed. (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Centre for Classification in Health. ICD-10-AM mental health manual. An integrated classification tool for community-based mental health services. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian bureau of statistics classification of qualifications (ABSCQ). Cat. 2901.0. Canberra: Australian Government; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Salyers M, Bosworth HB, Swanson JW, Lamb-Pagone J, Osher FC. Reliability and validity of the SF-12 health survey among people with severe mental illness. Med Care 2000;38:1141–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ware JE, Kosinski MA, Keller S. A 12-item short form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Mental health and wellbeing: profile of adults, Australia 1997. Catalogue No. 4326.0. Canberra: Australian Government; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kish L, Frankel MR. Balanced repeated replications for standard errors. J Amer Stat. Assoc 1970; 65:1071–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J. Model assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. SAS Institute. SAS 8.02 users guide [Computer software]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wittchen H, Essau C. An overview of the composite international diagnostic interview. Int J Meth Psychiatr Res. 1993;3:220–33.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Verbeek JH. How can doctors help their patients to return to work? PLoS Med. 2006;3:312–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research and the School of Population Health, The Park, Centre for Mental Health, Locked Bag 500, Richlands, Brisbane, 4077, QLD, Australia

    Geoffrey Waghorn

  2. The Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research and the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    David Chant

Authors
  1. Geoffrey Waghorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Chant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Waghorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waghorn, G., Chant, D. Receiving Treatment and Labor Force Activity in a Community Survey of People with Anxiety and Affective Disorders. J Occup Rehabil 17, 623–640 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9107-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9107-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation