Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 225–234 | Cite as

Perceived effort and low back pain in non-emergency ambulance workers: Implications for rehabilitation

  • Grace Y. T. Tam
  • Simon S. Yeung
Original Paper

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to explore factors associated with low back pain (LBP) that required treatment from health care provider among non-emergency ambulance transfer workers. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted to 38 workers of a major hospital in Hong Kong. The influences of four categories of risk factors (personal, physical, psychosocial, and exposure factors) in the prevalence of LBP were investigated by objective measurement and self-reported questionnaires. A modified Nordic musculoskeletal symptoms survey and sick leave record were used to document the prevalence of LBP. Univariate analyses followed by multiple logistic regression analyses were used to explore the risk factors associated with LBP cases. Results: The results revealed that LBP was associated with age (OR=0.75, CI=0.56–1.00, P < 0.05), perceived effort (OR=7.95, CI=1.46–43.27, P < 0.05), job satisfaction (OR=4.18 CI=1.42–12.33, P < 0.01), and flexor peak torque at 120°/s (OR=1.09 CI= 0.99–1.19, P=0.07). Conclusion: This study suggests that workers’ perceived exertion has an valuable role in assessing risk at this workplace. A high perceived exertion at work can signal the need for work adjustment or modification to avoid progression of low back disorder to persistent pain or intense pain. The effects of work adjustment or modification in affected workers needs to be systematically investigated.

Keywords

Low back pain definitions Non-emergency ambulance worker Physical risk factors Personal risk factors Psychosocial risk factors 

Reference

  1. 1.
    Webster BS, Snook SH. The cost of 1989 workers’ compensation low back pain claims. Spine 1994;19(10):1111–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clinical Standards Advisory Group. Epidemiology review: The epidemiology and cost of back pain. The annex to the clinical standards advisory group's report on back pain. London: Her Majesty's stationery Office; 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong Kong Occupational Safety and Health Council: A Telephone Survey on self-reported work-related illness and perceived hazards in Occupational Safety and Health in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Occupational Safety and Health Council, Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong. 23rd Mar 1999. http://www.oshc.org.hk/eng/research/research.htmGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engels JA, van der Beek AJ, van der Gulden JWJ. A LISREL analysis of work-related risk factors and health complaints in the nursing profession. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1998;71:537–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    French P, Lee FWF, Liu SP, Luk KB, Wong RHY. The prevalence and cause of occupational back pain in Hong Kong registered nurses. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:380–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hernandez L, Genaidy A, Davis S, Guo L, Alhemood A. A study of musculoskeletal strain experienced by nurses. Occup Ergon 1998;1:23–133.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Josephson M, Lagerstrom M, Hagberg M, Hjelm EW. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job strain among nursing personnel: a study over a three-year period. Occup Environ Med 1997;54:681–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lagerstrom M, Wenemark M, Hagberg M, Hjelm EW. Occupational and individual factors related to musculoskeletal symptoms in five body regions among Swedish nursing personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1995;68:27–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee YH, Chiou WK. Risk factors for low back pain, and patient-handling capacity of nursing personnel. J Saf Res 1994;25(3):135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smedley J, Egger P, Cooper C, Coggon D. Prospective cohort study of incident low back pain in nurses. Br Med J 1997;314:1225–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trinkoff AM, Lipscomb JA, Geiger-Brown J, Brady B. Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, shoulder and back and functional consequences in nurses. Am J Ind Med 2001;41:170–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yip YB. A study of work stress, patient handling activities and the risk of low back pain among nurses in Hong Kong. J Adv Nurs 2001;36:794–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Department of Labour: Statistics on Occupational Injuries Compiled by the Labour Department of Government Hong Kong Special Administration Region. 2004: http://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/osh/statistics/content/st-oi-13.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexopoulos EC, Burdorf A, Kalokerinou A. Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among nursing personnel in Greek hospitals. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2003;76:289–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ando S, Ono Y, Shimaoka M, Hiruta S, Hattori Y, Hori F, et al. Associations of self-estimated workloads with musculoskeletal symptoms among hospital nurses. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:211–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trinkoff AM, Lipscomb JA, Geiger-Brown J, Storr CL, Brady B. Perceived physical demands and reported musculoskeletal problems in registered nurses. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:270–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Violante FS, Fiori M, Fiorentini C, Risi A, Garagnani G, Bonfiglioli R, et al. Associations of psychosocial and individual factors with three different categories of back disorders among nursing staff. J Occup Health 2004;46:100–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van der Ploeg E, Kleber RJ. Acute and chronic job stressors among ambulance personnel: Predictors of health symptoms. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lavender SA, Conrad KM, Reichelt PA, Johnson PW, Meyer FT. Biomechanical analyses of paramedics simulating frequently performed strenuous work tasks. Appl Ergon 2000;31:167–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crill MT, Hostler D. Back strength and flexibility of EMS providers in practicing prehospital providers. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:105–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bigos SJ, Battié MC, Spengler DM, Fisher LD, Fordyce WE, Hansson TH, et al. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 1991;16(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ulrika A, Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Ängquist K, Brulin C. Relationships between work-related factors and disorders in the neck-shoulder and low-back region among female and male ambulance personnel. J Occup Health 2005;47:481–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Timm KE. Clinical applications of a normative database for the Cybex TEF and TORSO spinal isokinetic dynamometers. Isokinet Exerc Sci 1995;5:43–49.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2000, p. 69–72, 97–9, 300–12.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yeung SS, Genaidy AM, Karwowski W, Leung PC. Reliability and validity of self-reported assessment of exposure and outcome variables for manual lifting tasks: a Preliminary investigation. Appl Ergon 2002;33:463–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yeung S, Genaidy A, Deddens J, Alhemood A, Leung PC. Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in single and multiple body regions and effects of perceived risk of injury among manual handling workers. Spine 2002;27(19):2166–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilborm A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Soremsen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardized Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 1997;18(3):233–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feuerstein M, Berkowitz SM, Haufler AJ, Lopez MS, Huang GD. Working with low back pain: workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time. Am J Ind Med 2001;40(6):627–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Daniels C, Huang GD, Feuerstein M, Lopez M. Self-report measure of low back-related biomechanical exposures: Clinical validation. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:113–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lam E, Burdorf A. Interrelations of risk factors and low back pain in scaffolders. Occup Environ Med 2001;58(9):597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borg G. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exer 1982;14:377–81.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Karwowski W, Ayoub MM. Fuzzy modeling of stresses in manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 1984;27:641–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luzcak H, Ge S. Fuzzy modeling of relations between physical weight and perceived heaviness: The effect of size-weight illusion in industrial lifting tasks. Ergonomics 1989;32:823–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yeung SS, Genaidy A, Deddens J, Christin C, Leung PC. A Participatory approach to the study of lifting demands & musculoskeletal symptoms among Hong Kong workers. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:730–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yeung SS, Genaidy AM, Deddens J, Leung PC. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong? Ergonomics 2003;46(6):574–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yeung SS, Genaidy A, Deddens J, Leung PC. Worker assessment of manual lifting tasks: Cognitive strategies & validation with respect to objective indices and musculoskeletal symptoms. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2003;76(7):505–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Thomas E, Silman AJ, Macfarlane GJ. Psychosocial risks for low back pain: Are these related to work? Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57(8):500–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Magora A. Investigation of the relation between low back pain and occupation: psychological aspects. Scand J Work, Environ Health 1973;5:186–90.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Skovron ML, Szpalski M, Nordin M, Melot C, Cukier D. Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 1994;19(2):129–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alexander DA, Klein S. Ambulance personnel and critical incidents: Impact of accident and emergency work on mental health and emotional well-being. Br J Psychiatr 2001;178:76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Burdof A, Sorock G. Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work, Environ Health 1997;23:243–56.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chaffin DB. Pre-employment strength testing. J Occup Med 1978;20:403–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cady LD, Bischoff DP, O’Connell ER, Thomas PC, Allan JH. Strength and fitness and subsequent back injuries in firefighters. J Occup Med 1979;21:269–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Keyserling WM. Isometric strength testing as a mean of controlling medical incidents on strenuous jobs. J Occup Med 1980;22:332–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Batti’e MC, Bigos SJ, Fisher LD, Hansson TH, Nachemson AL, Spengler DM, et al. A prospective study of the role of cardiovascular risk factors and fitness in industrial back pain complaints. Spine 1989;14(2):141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kishino ND, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Parrish MM, Anderson C, Gustin L, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 4: isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 1985;10:921–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mayer TG, Smith SS, Keeley J, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 2: Sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back pain industrial population. Spine 1985;10:765–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mandell PJ, Marvin H, Kimberly PB. Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures—Differences and similarities between low-back injured and non-injured workers. Spine 1993;18:2491–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Newton M, Somerville D, Henderson I, Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part 2: experimental evaluation of the Cybex II back testing system in normal subjects and patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1993;18:812–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mostardi RA, Noe DA, Kovacik MW, Porterfield JA. Isokinetic lifting strength and occupational injury: A prospective study. Spine 1992;17:189–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dueker JA, Ritchie SM, Knox TJ, Rose SJ. Isokinetic trunk testing and employment. J Occup Med 1994;36(1): 42–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mooney V, Kenney K, Leggett S, Holmes B. Relationship of lumbar strength in shipyard workers to workplace injury claims. Spine 1996;21(17): 2001–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bernard BP. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity and low back pain. Cincinnati: US Department of Health and Human Services CDC (NIOSH), 1997: DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physiotherapy DepartmentUnited Christian HospitalKwun TongHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation ScienceThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong

Personalised recommendations