Introduction

A pandemic of coronavirus represents a burden for the entire world that threats the human life. Therefore, scientists try to find suitable drug can stop the viral replication. Graphene oxide (GO) is a new material that holds promising properties due to its unique structure [1]. It is composed of a single layer of graphene bound to oxygen in the form of carboxyl, hydroxyl, or epoxy groups [2, 3]. Due to its mechanical, electronic, optical and thermal properties GO has a major role in many applications such as energy storage devices, flexible electronics, sensors and solar cells. [4]. Cellulose is an attractive renewable raw material, non-toxic, biodegradable and biocompatible polymer. Therefore, it has been reported to be a promising material that used in numerous types of applications [5,6,7,8]. It has distinctive chemical structure composed of linear chains linked together by β(1 → 4)linked D-glucose unites [9]. Although it's distinctive properties, cellulose is insoluble in conventional solvents and it owing to inter and intra-molecular hydrogen bonds which obstacle it's direct reaction. For this reason cellulose needs indispensable modification to improve their properties and to extend the range of their uses [10,11,12]. Dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) is one of the most widely used and high reactive cellulose derivative [13]. It is synthesized via conventional oxidation process using sodium meta-periodate which makes specific and selective cleavage of the two secondary hydroxyl groups in C2-C3 vicinal hydroxyl groups in glucopyranose unite as in Fig. 1 [14,15,16].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Oxidation of cellulose

By this method aldehyde groups are introduced into polysaccharides and serve as useful material that can be used in different application such as adsorption of heavy metal, separation of protein and drug carriers, [7, 17, 18]. For a long time this process has used to produce dialdehyde cellulose, although it requires a long time [19, 20]. It takes place in two steps. First, cellulose reacts with sodium periodate for 4–12 h then follows by adding excess of ethylene glycol to quench the reaction [21,22,23]. So, improvement this method to decrease the reaction time became essential issue. Microwave is an eco-friendly method that not only reduces reaction time but also produces a considerable yield with high quality. Therefore it can be used in organic compounds synthesis [24,25,26]. In the present study, oxidation process has enhanced by using microwave irradiation in (DAC) synthesis to minimize the reaction time and GO is prepared via modified Hummer method. The structure and morphology of DAC, GO and DAC/GO composite were studied by (FTIR), (SEM) and (XRD). Mechanical properties of DAC and DAC/GO were investigated. Additionally, the computational calculations of cellulose and CDA by DFT/ B3LYP/6-31G (d) basis sets were investigated. Antimicrobial activity of DAC and DAC//GO composite against Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria was investigated. Also, molecular docking of DAC to show its interaction with microbial protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PDB (2W7Q), and Staphylococcus aureus PDB (1BQB) as well as with covid-19 PDB (7BZ5) was studied and compared with Hydroxychloroquine as a standard drug used against Covid-19.

Experimental

Materials

Cellulose was purchased from Loba Chem. And sodium periodate was purchased from Analytical Rasayan, Graphite (G) powder (99.9%) was provided by Fisher Scientific UK. Potassium permanganate (> 99%) and hydrogen peroxide (30%) were bought from Bio Basic Canada Inc. and Carl Roth GmbH, respectively. Sodium nitrate (99.99%) was supplied by Sd Fine-CHEM limited (India). All chemical and, reagents used were in analytical grade without any purification required before use.

Synthesis of Dialdehyde Cellulose (DAC)

Cellulose was oxidized with sodium periodate to different degrees of oxidation by microwave assistant as a new method. Briefly, 1.5 g of cellulose was dispersed in 20 ml distilled water. Then different ratios of sodium periodate were added (1, 2, and 3 g). Precursor was transferred to the microwave oven to complete the oxidation process at three different times (0.5, 1 and 1.5 Min). The oxidized product was filtered and washed with ethanol many times then dried overnight at room temperature.

Determination of Aldehyde Content

Aldehyde content of oxidized cellulose was determined according to Ref [27] by Schiff’ base reaction. In which aldehyde groups convert to corresponding oxime using hydroxylamine hydrochloride. 0.3 g of the DAC sample was dispersed in 20 ml distilled water and the (pH 5) by sodium hydroxide solution. Then 20 ml hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution (0.72 mol/l) with pH 5 was added. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 4 h. The released hydrochloric acid was titrated by using 1.0 M aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. The amount of NaOH consumed when the pH value of the solution reached 5.0 was recorded [22].The volume of alkali solution consumed in the titration was recorded as Va (in litre). The same concentration of cellulose solution at pH 5.0 was used as a blank and the volume of 1.0 M sodium hydroxide solution consumed was recorded as Vc (in litre). The aldehyde content (% w/w) calculated using the following equation [28, 29].

$${-}{\text{CHO }} + {{\text{NH}}_{2}} {\text{OH}}{-}{\text{HCl}} \to {-}{\text{CHNOH}} + {\text{ HCl }} + {\text{ H}}_{2} {\text{O}}$$
$${\text{HCl }} + {\text{ NaOH}} \to {\text{NaCl }} + {\text{ H}}_{{2}} {\text{O}}$$
$${\text{Aldehyde Content }}\left( \% \right) = \frac{{C_{{{\text{NaOH}}}} \times \, \left( {{\text{Va }} - {\text{ Vc}}} \right)}}{{8 \times \;{\text{m/M}}}}$$

where CNaOH = 1.0 M, m is the dry weight of DAC (0.3 g) used in the experiment and M molecular weight of the repeating unit of cellulose (162).

Preparation of GO

In typical procedure, graphene oxide (GO) was produced using modified hummer method from pure graphite powder. In this method, 27 ml of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and 3 ml of phosphoric acid (H3PO4) (volume ratio 9:1) were mixed and stirred for several minutes. Then 0.225 g of graphite powder was added into mixing solution under stirring condition. 1.32 g of potassium permanganate (KMnO4) was then added slowly into the solution. This mixture was stirred for 6 h until the solution became dark green. To eliminate excess of KMnO4, 0.675 ml of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was dropped slowly and stirred for 10 min. The exothermic reaction occurred and let it to cool down. 10 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 30 ml of deionized water (DIW) was added and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 7 min. Then, the supernatant was decanted away and the residuals were then rewashed again with HCl and DIW for 3 times. The washed GO solution was dried using oven at 90 °C for 24 h to produce the powder of GO [30].

Preparation of DAC/GO Film

DAC film was prepared with and without GO by casting method [31]. In 250 ml bottle reagent 1 g of DAC was dispersed in 20 ml deionized water. 0.05 g of prepared GO is added with continues stirring. Then 10 ml PVA (5% w/v) and 1 ml (25% w/v) glycerol were added. A homogenous solution obtained by ultra-sonication for 2 min. in an ice bath the solution was poured onto a Teflon plate and left to dry at room temperature.

Characterization

FT-IR spectra of cellulose and DAC were recorded in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 on (Shimadzu 8400S) FT-IR Spectrophotometer. The surface morphology of cellulose, DAC and DAC/ GO film were analyzed using electron microscope FEI IN SPECTS Company, Philips, Holland, environmental scanning without coating. The crystallinity of cellulose, DAC, GO and DAC/ GO were detected using an X-ray diffractometer. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using a Brukur D8 Advance X-ray diffract meter (Germany). The diffraction patterns were recorded using copper (Kα) target with a secondary monochromatic at 40 kV and 40 mA. The crystallinity index (CrI) was defined according to [6].

$${\text{C}}_{{\text{r}}} {\text{I }}\% \, = \, \left( {{\text{I}}_{002} - {\text{I}}_{{{\text{am}}}} } \right) \, /{\text{ I}}_{002} \times 100$$

where I002 is the maximum intensity of 002 lattice diffraction at 2θ = 21–23 and Iam is the intensity of diffraction in the same unite at 2θ = 18°. The stress–strain curve of the DAC, and DAC/GO composite film were measured on 6 cm film strips (width 15 mm; length 20 mm) using a Lloyd instrument (Lloyd Instruments, West Sussex, United Kingdom (with a 5-N load cell measurements were made at room temperature [31].

Computational Procedures

Calculations of Density Functional Theory (DFT) with a hybrid functional B3LYP (Becke's three-parameter hybrid functional using the BLYP correlation functional) with the 6-31G(d) basis set exhausting the Berny method were performed with the Gaussian 09 W program [31, 32].

Molecular Modeling and Docking

The molecular modeling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NCID-9016) as Gram-negative bacteria PDB (2W7Q), Staphylococcus aureus (NCTC-7447) as Gram-positive bacteria PDB (1BQB) and Covid-19 (7BZ5) with DAC was fabricated using standard bond lengths and angles, with the Auto Dock Vina and detected by Discovery Studio Client (version 4.2) [32]

Antimicrobial Study

The antimicrobial test was carried out via the plat diffusion method according to previous [13, 31, 33] studies with about 0.2 gm of DAC and DAC/GO individual. Five microorganisms are tested against conjugate Bacillus subtilis (NCID-3610) and Staphylococcus aureus (NCTC-7447) as Gram-positive bacteria, and, Escherichia coli (NCTC-10416) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NCID-9016) as Gram-negative bacteria as well as Candida albicans (NCCLS 11) were used. One colony of each microbial strain was suspended in a physiological saline solution (NaCl 0.9% in distilled water at pH 6.5).

Result and Discussion

Synthesis of Dialdehyde Cellulose (DAC)

Dialdehyde cellulose is successfully prepared by sodium periodat oxidation via microwave irradiation, which produced selective cleavage of the two secondary hydroxyl groups in C2–C3 vicinal hydroxyl groups in glucopyranose unite in cellulose chains; giving ring-opened product with dialdehyde groups as in Fig. 2a. In this method large numbers of dialdehyed introduced in cellulose chain with high selectivity and high yield [27].

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Synthesis of DAC, b FTIR of cellulose and DAC

Aldehyde content (AC) represents the oxidation degree (the percentage of monosaccharide units which reacted with periodate) [27]. Table 1. shows the effect of periodate dosage and the reaction time on aldehyde content AC which increased according to periodate dosage increased to reach high value 63% with high yield 98% this result agree with previous result reported by [28]. On the other hand, aldehyde content increased with the reaction time increased to reach high value 63% with yield 85% then started decrease. It may be due to increasing hemiacetal bonds which act as protecting group toward periodate oxidation [15].

Table 1 Effect of time and NaIO4 on aldehyde content AC

FT-IR Analysis

FTIR of cellulose and DAC were displayed in Fig. 2b. In a comparison between cellulose and DAC spectra found that, cellulose showed adsorption bands of OH stretching at 3000–3500 cm−1, and CH stretching at 2900 cm−1, these peaks became narrow and deceased in DAC spectra [34]. The peak at 1640 cm−1 represents the OH bending of the adsorbed water in cellulose [13] while the peak at 1650 cm−1 in DAC spectrum represents the carbonyl group C=O of dialdehyde [35] sometimes this peak can be very small and hidden due to presence DAC in hydrated form but presence of hemiacetal peak confirms DAC formation [36]. Adsorption bands of CH2 bending vibrations and C–O–C at 1380 cm−1 and 1040 cm−1 respectively, decreased in DAC due to degradation of cellulose [13, 33]. In DAC spectra a new adsorption band at 800–750 corresponding to hemiacetal bond which is a characteristic peak of aldehyde [14, 27]. This bond formed between newly aldehyde groups and their adjacent hydroxyl groups OH [37].

Preparation of GO

GO has synthesized by modified Hummer method oxidation. Through this method, multi layers of graphite converted to mono-layer with new groups such as carbonyl, carboxylic, and hydroxyl that incorporated in GO matrix as in Fig. 3a. As shown in Fig. 3b, XRD has used to investigate the formation of GO from graphite which has distinctive peak at 2θ = 26, while GO has a characteristic peak at 2θ = 10 due to new groups formation which confirms successful oxidation of graphite [38, 39].

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Synthesis of GO by modified Hummer method, b XRD of graphite and GO

X-Ray Diffraction

Cellulose has amorphous and crystalline regions at (2θ) 15, 22° respectively. Figure 4 represents the effect of the oxidation process on crystallinity of cellulose. A complete degradation occurred for cellulose chains, therefore the crystallinity decreased from 85% in cellulose to 45% in DAC as well as the structure of cellulose changed according to the oxidation. The broad peak at (2θ) 20–23° which represents the crystallinity region in cellulose decreased in DAC [36]. The loss of crystallinity is due to the ring-opened formation of the glucopyranose units and destruction of their backbone. These results agree with a similar XRD pattern for natural oxidized polysaccharide was reported by [17, 27, 28]. After loading GO on DAC matrix, the peak at 2θ = 10 of GO disappeared. It was noticed that the crystallinity of DAC slightly changed by incorporation of GO [40].

Fig. 4
figure 4

XRD of cellulose, DAC and DAC/GO

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Figure 5a shows the surface morphology of cellulose and DAC, and how the oxidation process affected on cellulose surface morphology and their ordered structure. The surface morphology of cellulose changed after oxidation process. As it seems in Fig. 5 the backbone structure of cellulose is destroyed as a result of the ring-opened formation. In SEM images, cellulose fibers appear as large and long fragments, while DAC appears as small and short fragments due to the degradation process [17, 28]. DAC/GO image represents homogenous surface incorporated with GO that looks clustered on the entire surface [30].

Fig. 5
figure 5

a SEM of cellulose, DAC and DAC/GO, b Stress/ strain curve of DAC and DAC/GO

Mechanical Properties

Tensile strength and elongation at break of DAC and DAC/GO film were investigated at room temperature. Figure 5b shows stress/strain curve that shows softness and hardness of the films. DAC/GO film has tensile strength (stress) of 6.5 Mpa more than DAC which has tensile strength of 2.2 Mpa and it returns to decrease crystallinity of DAC due to oxidation process and destruction of the chains backbone. This confirms that GO improve tensile strength by forming hydrogen bonds with DAC [40].

Computational Procedures

Optimized geometries of cellulose, DAC as a monomer and GO were calculated by DFT B3LYP/6-31G (d) bases site. Figure 6a shows the molecular structure of cellulose and DAC are not planer. And DAC molecular structure changed as a result of periodate oxidation due to ring-opened and backbone destruction. Table 2 shows some parameters reflect the reactivity and the stability of molecules such as total energy ET, energy of highest occupied (electron donating) MO EHOMO, energy of lowest unoccupied (electron accepting) MO ELUMO, energy gap (Eg). GO and DAC are more reactive than cellulose due to low absolute hardness (η) and high absolute softness (σ) due to oxidation process [41] based on dipole moment (μ), absolute electronegativity’s (χ) and chemical potentials (Pi) values. Also global electrophilicity (ω), and additional electronic charge, (ΔNmax) are calculated using the following equations [31, 32].

$$\Delta E={E}_{LUMO }-{E}_{HOMO}$$
(1)
$$\chi =\frac{-({E}_{HOMO }+{E}_{LUMO})}{2}$$
(2)
$$\upeta =\frac{( {E}_{LUMO}-{E}_{HOMO})}{2}$$
(3)
$$\sigma = 1/ \, \eta$$
(4)
$${\text{Pi}} = - {\text{X}}$$
(5)
$${{\varvec{\upomega}}} = {\text{Pi}}^{{2}} /{2}$$
(6)
$$\Delta {\text{N}}_{\max } = - {\text{ Pi/}}\eta$$
(7)
Fig. 6
figure 6figure 6

a The optimized geometry and numbering system of cellulose, DAC and GO. b Gap energy (HOMO–LUMO) (eV) for cellulose, DAC and GO usingDFTB3LYP/6-31G (d)

Table 2 Optimized geometries of cellulose, DAC and GO

Figure 6b Shows frontier molecular orbital, which is a guide principle for chemical and physical properties of molecule [42]. As the energy gap (Eg) decrease the reactivity of molecule increase and it can be excited easily with small energy [43]. The energy gap (Eg) between electron donating molecular orbital HOMO and electron accepting molecular orbital LUMO connected to the biological activity and stability of compounds. Since DAC, GO show a biological activities, therefore, the investigation of the different conformational structures of DAC, GO is important for drug design and to understand the several medicinal effects [44]. As in Table 2 energy gap (Eg) of GO is less than energy gap (Eg) of DAC and cellulose which makes GO more reactive than DAC and cellulose [32, 43]

Molecular Modeling and Docking

Figure 7a shows plausible interaction sites of DAC to bind in active pocket of protein. Molecular docking shows DAC acts as a ligand with microbial protein that acts as a receptor, Pseudomonas aeruginosa as Gram-negative bacteria PDB (2W7Q) 7b, and Staphylococcus aureus as Gram-positive bacteria PDB (1BQB) 7c as well as with covid-19 PDB (7BZ5) 7d. Wherein docking of protein–ligand the hydrogen bonds interaction confirmed hydrophobic interaction between hydroxyl group OH and C=O of DAC with NH group of amino acid protein with excellent confirmation interaction energy score (− 4.1, − 4.0, − 4.0) Kcal/mol and short bond length (1.5 Å, 1.07 Å, 1.2 Å) respectively. Hydroxychloroquine 7E is a standard drug used for Covid-19, shows binding energy (− 3.6) Kcal/mol with short bond length (1.4 Å) with covid-19 PDB (7BZ5) more than DAC. The result suggests that DAC has drug-like behavior.

Fig. 7
figure 7

a Interaction side of DAC with protein, b DAC binding with protein PDB(2W7Q), c DAC binding with protein PDB (1BQB), d DAC binding with protein PDB(7BZ5) and e Hydroxychloroquine binding with protein PDB(7BZ5)

Antimicrobial Activity

Figure 8 illustrates the antimicrobial activity of DAC and DAC/GO. The results show that DAC inhibited the growth of both Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria and it is attributed to dialdehyde group formation [29]. There are two mechanisms for antimicrobial activity. The first is the reactive oxygen species (ROS) where O2 release from DAC and GO then reacts with thiol –SH group in protein and forms H2O2 that can form radical and destroy microbe membrane [31]. The second mechanism is the hydrogen bond formation between DAC and GO with bacterial protein. This interaction leads to damage cytoplasmic membrane and destroy the protein due to prevent the nutrient uptake process of the bacterial cell [45].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Antimicrobial activity of DAC and DAC/GO

Conclusion

Conventional oxidation process has improved and reaction time has decreased. Dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) has successfully synthesized for the first time under microwave irradiation with high yield and high aldehyde content (AC) reached to 98% and 63%, respectively. GO has successfully synthesized via modified Hummer method. As well as DAC/GO composite has prepared and showed antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. DAC, GO and DAC/GO have characterized via FTIR, SEM and XRD. Mechanical properties of DAC and DAC/GO were investigated and the results showed that GO improved tensile strength (stress) of 6.5 Mpa of the composite. Additionally, the computational calculations of cellulose, DAC and GO by DFT/ B3LYP/6-31G (d) basis sets were investigated. Also, the molecular docking of DAC show strong interaction with microbial protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as Gram-negative bacteria PDB(2W7Q), and Staphylococcus aureus as Gram-positive bacteria PDB (1BQB) as well as with Covid-19 PDB (7BZ5) with excellent confirmation interaction energy score (− 4.1, − 4.0, − 4.0) Kcal/mol with short bond length (1.5 Å, 1.07 Å, 1.2 Å) respectively. The result suggests that DAC has drug-like behavior.