Comparative Response of Indigenously Developed Bacterial Consortia on Progressive Degradation of Polyhydroxybutyrate Film Composites
- 33 Downloads
The global demand of bioplastics has lead to an exponential increase in their production commercially. Hence, biodegradable nature needs to be evaluated in various ecosystems viz. air, water, soil and other environmental conditions to avoid the polymeric waste accumulation in the nature. In this paper, we investigated the progressive response of two indigenously developed bacterial consortia, i.e., consortium-I (C-I: Pseudomonas sp. strain Rb10, Pseudomonas sp. strain Rb11 and Bacillus sp. strain Rb18), and consortium-II (C-II: Lysinibacillus sp. strain Rb1, Pseudomonas sp. strain Rb13 and Pseudomonas sp. strain Rb19), against biodegradation behavior of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) film composites, under natural soil ecosystem (in net house). The biodegraded films recovered after 6 and 9 months of incubation were analyzed through Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy to determine the variations in chemical and morphological parameters (before and after incubation). Noticeable changes in the bond intensity, surface morphology and conductivity were found when PHB composites were treated with C-II. These changes were drastic in case of blends in comparison to copolymer. The potential isolates not only survived, but, also, there was a significant increase in bacterial diversity during whole period of incubation. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first report which described the biodegradation potential of Lysinibacillus sp. as a part of C-II with Pseudomonas sp. against PHB film composites.
KeywordsIn situ biodegradation Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) Scanning electron microscopy Lysinibacillus sp.
Senior author (SR) acknowledges “Department of Science and Technology” for INSPIRE Junior Research Fellowship for providing financial assistance during the course of this study. We thank Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pantnagar, and Fraunhofer Institute IPK, Berlin, Germany for FT-IR, SEM analysis, and PHB film specimens, respectively.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Doi Y, Fukuda K (2014) Biodegradable plastics and polymers: proceedings of the third international workshop on biodegradable plastics and polymers. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 3.Rajaratanam DD, Ariffin H, Hassan MA, Kawasaki Y, Nishida H (2017) Polym Degrad Stab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.01.007 Google Scholar
- 6.Pachekoski WM, Dalmolin C, Agnelli JAM (2013) Mater Res 16(2):327–332Google Scholar
- 9.Bohlmann GM (2005) General characteristics, processability, industrial applications and market evolution of biodegradable polymers. In: Bastioli C (ed) Handbook of biodegradable polymers. Rapra Technology Ltd, Shropshire, pp 183–212Google Scholar
- 15.Ren H, Hang Y, Zhai H, Chen J (2015) Cell Chem Technol 49(7–8):641–652Google Scholar
- 16.Joyyi L, Ahmad Thirmizir MZ, Salim MS, Han L, Murugan P, Kasuya Ki, Maurer FHJ, Zainal Arifin MI, Sudesh K (2017) Polym Degrad Stab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.01.004 Google Scholar
- 17.Pathak S, Sneha CLR, Mathew BB (2014) JPBPC 2(4):84–90Google Scholar
- 23.Adhikari D, Mukai M, Kubota K, Kai T, Kaneko N (2016) J Agric Chem Environ 5:23–34Google Scholar
- 27.Knoll M, Hamm TM, Wagner F, Martinez V, Pleiss J (2009) BMC Bioinform 10(89):1–8Google Scholar
- 29.Andrade LL, Leite DCA, Ferreira EM, Ferreira LQ, Paula GR, Maguire MJ, Hubert CRJ, Peixoto RS, Domingues RMCP., Rosado AS (2012) BMC Microbiol 12(186):1–10Google Scholar
- 35.Goel R, Sah A, Kapri A (2010) DBT, India Patent 213/DEL/2011Google Scholar
- 39.Muyzer G, De Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Appl Environ Microbiol 59(3):695–700Google Scholar
- 43.Omer A (2010) Life Sci J 7(4):124–131Google Scholar
- 58.Goncalves S, Franchetti S (2013) Int J Mater Sci 3(2):154–161Google Scholar
- 61.Iordanskii A, Bonartseva G, Pankova Y, Rogovina S (2014) J Inform Intell Knowl 6(4):479-51Google Scholar
- 62.Arya M, Kumar H, Zaidi MGH, Chauhan A (2013) Fabrication and characterization of graphite/epoxy composites. Proceedings of National Conference TSPC, pp 136–138Google Scholar
- 66.Rastogi G, Sani RK (2011) Molecular techniques to assess microbial community structure, function, and dynamics in the environment. In: Ahmad I, Ahmad F, Pichtel J (eds) Microbes and microbial technology. Springer, New York, pp 29–57 Google Scholar