Utilization of Porous Carbons Derived from Coconut Shell and Wood in Natural Rubber
- 325 Downloads
The porous carbons derived from cellulose are renewable and environmentally friendly. Coconut shell and wood derived porous carbons were characterized with elemental analysis, ash content, X-ray diffraction, infrared absorbance, particle size, surface area, and pore volume. The results were compared with carbon black. Uniaxial deformation of natural rubber (NR) composites indicate the composites reinforced with the porous carbon from coconut shell have higher tensile moduli at the same elongation ratio than the composites reinforced with wood carbon. 40 % coconut shell composite showed a fivefold increase in tensile modulus compared to NR. Polymer–filler interactions were studied with frequency dependent shear modulus, swelling experiments and dynamic strain sweep experiments. Both linear and non-linear viscoelastic properties indicate the polymer–filler interactions are similar between coconut shell carbon and wood carbon reinforced composites. The swelling experiments, however, showed that the polymer–filler interaction is greater in the composites reinforced with coconut shell instead of wood carbon.
KeywordsPorous carbons Natural rubber Mechanical properties Polymer–filler interactions
The authors would like to thank A. Thompson for energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, A. J. Thomas for ash analysis, G. Gross for X-ray measurements, and A. Maness for elemental analysis.
- 1.Kang BS, Lee KH, Park HJ, Park YK, Kim JS (2006) J Anal Appl Pyrol 76:32–37Google Scholar
- 2.Pastor-Villegas J, Pastor-Valle JF, Meneses Rodriguez JM, Garcia Garcia M (2006) J Anal Appl Pyrol 76:103–108Google Scholar
- 4.Gamage NJW (1987) M.S. Thesis, University of Moratuwa, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
- 6.Qi Q, Wu Y, Tian M, Liang G, Zhang L, Ma J (2006) Polymer 47:3093–3896Google Scholar
- 8.Greve HH (2000) Rubber, 2. Natural. In Ullmann’s encyclopaedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- 10.Barnard D, Lewis PM (1988) In: Roberts AD (ed) Natural rubber science and technology. Oxford Unversity Press, Oxford (Chapter 14)Google Scholar
- 11.Archer BL, Barnard D, Cockbain EG, Dickenson PB, McMullen AI (1963) Chapter 3, structure, composition and biochemistry of Hevea latex. In: Bateman L (ed) The chemistry and physics of rubber-like substances. MacLaren & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lyon F, Burgess K (1985) Carbon black. In: Kroschwitz JI (ed) Encyclopaedia of polymer science and engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mark JE, Erman B (1988) Rubberlike elasticity: a molecular primer. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.Maier PG, Goritz D (1996) Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 49:18–21Google Scholar
- 33.Cunneen JI, Russell RM (1969) J Rubber Res Inst Malaya 22(3):300–308Google Scholar