Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 623–630 | Cite as

Tensile Strength, Elongation, Hardness, and Tensile and Flexural Moduli of Injection-Molded TPS Filled with Glycerol-Plasticized DDGS

  • S. C. Clarizio
  • R. A. Tatara
Original Paper
  • 277 Downloads

Abstract

Continuing growth of biofuel industries is generating large amounts of coproducts such as distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) from ethanol production and glycerol from biodiesel. Currently these coproducts are undervalued, but they have application in the plastics industry as property modifiers. This research effort has quantified the effects on mechanical properties of adding DDGS and glycerol to a commercial thermoplastic starch (TPS). The methodology was to physically mix DDGS, as filler, with the TPS pellets and injection mold the blends into test bars using glycerol as a processing aid. The bars were then mechanically tested with blends from 0 to 65 %, by weight, of plasticized filler. The test bars were typically relatively brittle with little yielding prior to fracture with elongation between 1 and 3 %. The addition of glycerol enabled molding of blends with high levels of DDGS but did not increase strength. Any presence of filler decreased the tensile strength of the starch, and up to 30 % filler, the tensile strength drops about 15 %. The 20 and 50 % blends (without glycerol) have slightly greater stiffness than pure starch. With some other blends, the presence of plasticized filler degrades the tensile modulus with 35 % filler yielding about 1/3 the stiffness. Changes in the flexural modulus are much more pronounced as 20–25 % filled TPS has a 30 % increase in flexural stiffness. In terms of surface hardness, blends up to 60 % filler are within 20 % of the TPS baseline.

Keywords

DDGS Glycerol Mechanical properties Thermoplastic starch TPS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, under agreement No. 58-5447-0-346. Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the United States Department of Agriculture and does not imply approval of a product to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This work was also supported by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant SU-83473601.

References

  1. 1.
    Mohanty AK, Seydibeyoglu MO, Misra M (2009) SAMPE’09 spring symposium conference proceedings. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diebel W, Reddy MM, Misra M, Mohanty A (2012) Biomass Bioenergy 37:88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosentrater KA, Otieno AW (2006) J Polym Environ 14:335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vogel J, Montalbo MT, Srinivasan G, Grewell D (2007) ANTEC 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers, Cincinnati, OH, 2:1057Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiOrio NR, Tatara RA, Rosentrater KA, Otieno AW (2012) In: Liu K, Rosentrater KA (eds) Distillers grains: production, properties, and utilization. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 429–448Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li Y, Sun XS (2011) J Appl Polym Sci 121:589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarizio SC, Tatara RA (2012) J Polym Environ 20:638CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of TechnologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations