Processing Stability and Biodegradation of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Composites Reinforced with Cotton Linters or Maple Hardwood Fibres
- 775 Downloads
Polylactic acid (PLA) composites comprising up to 25 wt% cotton linter (CL) or up to 50 % maple wood fibre (WF) were prepared by compounding and injection moulding. A reduction of crystallinity in the PLA matrix was observed as a result of the thermal processing method. These PLACL and PLAWF composites provided excellent improvements in both stiffness (with increases in tensile and flexural modulus) and toughness (increases in notched impact strength) properties over the neat PLA resin, while the tensile and flexural strengths of the composites were generally unchanged, while the strain at break values were reduced in comparison to the neat PLA. DMA results indicated incorporating these fibres caused the mechanical loss factor (tan δ) to decrease, suggesting better damping capabilities were achieved with the composites. SEM analysis of the impact fractured surfaces of the PLACL composites showed debonding-cavitation at the matrix-fibre interface while the PLAWF composites showed good wetting along its matrix-fibre interface. The composting of these composites up to 90 days showed that the degradation onset time was increased when increasing the fibre loadings, but the maximum degree of degradation and the maximum daily rates of degradation were decreased compared to neat PLA. On a weight basis of fibre loading, the PLACL composites had a quicker onset of biodegradation, a higher maximum daily rate of biodegradation and, overall, a higher degree of biodegradation at 90 days than the PLAWF composites, possibly due to the quicker thermal hydrolysis observed in the PLA matrix of the PLACL composites during processing and composting.
KeywordsCotton linters Maple fibres Polylactic acid (PLA) Thermomechanical properties Scanning electron microscopy Biodegradation Composting
The authors gratefully acknowledge Buckeye Technologies Inc. (USA) for supplying the cotton linter fibres free of charge, and for providing relevant technical information.
- 2.AWF (2011) American Wood Fibers website. Maryland, USA. www.awf.com. Accessed 22 March 2012
- 24.Osswald TA (May 26–27, 1999) In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference of wood fiber–plastic composites Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
- 26.Folkes MJ (1985) In: Bevis MJ (ed) Short fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Research Studies Press, Chichester, p 151Google Scholar
- 31.Mascia L (1974) In: The role of additives in plastics, chap 3. Edward Arnold, London UKGoogle Scholar
- 38.George J, Thomas S, Bhagawan SS (1999) J Thermoplast Compos Mater 12:443–464Google Scholar
- 40.Liu X, Dever M, Fair N, Benson RS (1997) J Polym Environ 5:225–235Google Scholar
- 44.MatWeb (2012) Material Property Data. Online Database. Maple wood properties—various species. www.matweb.com. Accessed 22 March 2012
- 45.Bergman R, Cai Z, Carll CG, Clausen CA, Dietenberger MA, Falk RH, Frihart CR, Glass SV, Hunt CG, Ibach RE, Kretschmann DE, Rammer DR, Ross RJ (2010) Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin USAGoogle Scholar