Optimization of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production from Thermus thermophilus HB8 Using Response Surface Methodology
The thermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus HB8 was used for the overproduction of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) using a mathematical approach for the first time for optimization of process variables. In addition, the combined effect of nitrogen and phosphate concentrations on PHAs production was also investigated. A five-level-three-factor central composite rotary design was employed in combination with response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the process variables for the production of PHAs in Thermus thrermophilus HB8. The three independent variables studied in the work were cultivation time, C/N ratio and phosphate concentration. Two second-order polynomial equations were obtained for biomass and PHA production by multiple regression analysis using RSM. The statistical analyses of the results showed that all the three variables had significant impact both on the cell growth and polymer accumulation. The model predicted a maximum PHA production of 0.47 g/L which represents the 42 % of dry cell weight (DCW) after 55 h of cultivation and with on setting the C/N ratio at 9:1 g/g and phosphate concentration at 20 mM. Verification of the predicted value resulted into a PHA production of 0.44 g/L (40.36 % of DCW).
KeywordsPolyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Response surface methodology (RSM) Thermus thermophilus HB8
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
- 3.Madison LL, Huisman GW (1999) Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:21Google Scholar
- 4.Anderson AJ, Dawes EA (1990) Microbiol Rev 54:150Google Scholar
- 7.Porwal S, Kumar T, Lal S, Rani A, Kumar S, Cheema S, Purohit HJ, Sharma R, Singh Patel SK, Kalia VC (2008) Bioresour Technol 99:5444Google Scholar
- 16.Jun YS, Yu SH, Ryu KG, Lee TJ (2008) J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:1130Google Scholar
- 17.Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1987) In: Dekker M (ed) Response surface: design and analyses. ASQC Quality Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Montgomery DC (1991) Design and analysis of experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nikel PI, Pettinari MJ, Mendez BS, Galvagno MA (2005) Int Microbiol 8:243Google Scholar
- 21.Sharma L, Kumar Singh A, Panda B, Mallick N (2007) Bioresour Technol 98:987Google Scholar
- 34.Ryu HW, Hahn SK, ChangYK, Chang HN (1997) Biotechnol Bioeng 55:28Google Scholar