Comparing the Growth Characteristics of Three Bacteria Involved in Degrading Rubbers
- 117 Downloads
Three bacteria isolated for degradation of rubbers were compared for their growth characteristics derived from the Bradford protein assay and turbidity (optical density, OD) measurement. Both Alcaligenes xylosoxidans T2 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa GP10 were fast-growing bacteria while Nocardia corynebacterioides S3 was a slow grower utilizing rubber as the sole source of carbon and energy, but the extent of degradation was lower by the formers than the latter. A. xylosoxidans T2, P. aeruginosa GP10 and N. corynebacterioides S3 showed a typical sigmoidal growth pattern based on binding of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G250 to bacterial proteins and spectrophotometrical measurement at 600 nm. Both assays showed similar growth characteristics for all three bacteria in this study. Degradation of rubber was more pronounced by N. corynebacterioides S3 than either A. xylosoxidans T2 or P. aeruginosa GP10 during 70 days of incubation. Our results suggest that slow-growing bacteria may play a much greater role in degrading polymeric materials than was previously believed.
KeywordsBradford assay Coomassie Brilliant Blue-G250 Bacterial growth Polymer deterioration
This research was supported in part by the ‘863 Project’ No. 2002AA601160 and SCSIO project No. LYQY200306. We thank Jessie Lai of this laboratory for technical assistance.
- 1.Gu J-D, Ford TE, Mitton B, Mitchell R (2000) In: Revie W (ed) The Uhlig corrosion handbook. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 439–460Google Scholar
- 2.Gu J-D (2003) In: Steinbüchel A (ed) Biopolymers, vol 10: Special applications and general aspects. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, pp 97–138Google Scholar
- 4.Gu J-D (2005) In: Kultz M (ed) Handbook of environmental degradation of materials. William Andrew Publishing, New York, pp 179–206Google Scholar
- 6.J-D Gu, Pan L (2006) Int Biodeterior Biodegrad (accepted)Google Scholar
- 7.Daniels L, Hanson RS, Phillips JA (1994) In: Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR (eds) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 512–554Google Scholar
- 12.Sapan CV, Lundblad RL, Price NC (1999) Appl Biochem 29:99Google Scholar
- 15.Gu J-D, Li J, Wang Y (2005) Wat Sci Tech 52(8):241Google Scholar
- 17.Heisey RM, Papadatos S (1995) Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3092Google Scholar