Journal of Network and Systems Management

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 161–188 | Cite as

Operator User Management System Based on the TMF615 Standard

  • Melike Yigit
  • Muhammed Macit
  • V. Cagri Gungor
  • Taskin Kocak
  • Oguz Ozhan


Multi-vendor telecommunications networks in a typical service provider environment are managed using multiple proprietary user management systems (UMS), supplied by the operational support system (OSS) vendors. The management of a typical service provider includes communications solutions put into place between the global UMS and the local UMS. Nowadays, in service provider environments OSSs exist that use multi-vendor communications’ protocols. In the telecommunications sector, the centralized management of all these different OSSs can cause serious problems for the network operation. In this respect, there is an urgent need for a standardized and centralized provisioning and auditing mechanism for the operators and their entitlements that work on these management systems. To address this need and to provide efficient operations among different service provider network components, this paper outlines the design and development of a TMF615 (Tele Management Forum) standard-based, common communication platform. In this respect, the proposed approach includes a common interface to address communication problems in multi-vendor, service provider environments. The interface and performance evaluations developed are some of the first solutions in this field, and the resulting solutions are converted into a commercial product with a high added value. In this regard, our proposed approach makes an important contribution to scientific literature and commercial applications. The realization of the proposed TMF615 standard-based interface enables the efficient and easy integration of existing and new OSSs of the service providers. In this way, a standardized interface is offered, along with a common communications platform adequate for all different systems. The vendors are thereby only responsible for application development based on specifications, and a standardized communications process is introduced for all related systems. This significantly facilitates the management of service providers, system performance is improved, and a massive cost reduction is provided at the same time. Consequently, the efficient management of network components is provided using a common standardized interface. In this respect, we aim to explain the TMF615 specifications; the evolution of UMS, OSSs and TMF615 with centralized UMS, as well as the implementation and performance evaluation of the TMF615 protocol are all explained in this paper.


Operational support system Service providers Standardized provisioning 



This work was supported by Alcatel-Lucent Teletaş and Turkish Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology’s SanTez Program under Grant # 00632.STZ.2010-1.


  1. 1.
    TMF615: Telecom oss operator user management information agreement. TM Forum Release 1.1, 1.5 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chou, T.-H., Seng, J.-L., Lin, B.: eTOM and e-services based trouble-management operations: a large scale telecom case study. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 43(4), 383–403 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3. Ngoss release 7.5 solution suite release notes. (2009a). 2 March 2009
  4. 4. The ngoss technology-neutral architecture. (2006b). 2 March 2009
  5. 5. Shared information/data (sid) model. (2004). 11 Feb 2009
  6. 6.
    Milham, D., Ronco, E.: How can the eTOM/sup/spl reg//framework help service providers in today’s marketplace? In: Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2004. NOMS 2004. IEEE/IFIP, vol. 1, pp. 59–71. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, C.-Y., Lin, P., Shih, C.-S., Fu, H.-L., Jeng, J.-Y.: A middleware approach for migration of legacy telecom operational support systems into ngoss-compliant. In: Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS), 2011 13th Asia-Pacific, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borghini, M., Capuozzo, G., D’angelo, G.: Open gateway framework. US Patent 8,392,933 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eslambolchi, H., McCanuel, J., Vasa, P.: Tiered and modular approach to operational support systems. US Patent 7,882,209 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maes, S.: Shared view of customers across business support systems (bss) and a service delivery platform (sdp). US Patent 8,073,810 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Driss, B., Hilbert, F., Wallis, K.: Ericsson solution framework based on tmf standards. (2010)
  12. 12.
    Shi, F.S., Zhou, Y., Shi, P.: The design of operation and maintenance management system about it platform based on tivoli. In: Sung, W.-P., Kao, J.C.-M., Chen, R. (eds.) Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 599, pp. 2215–2219. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nye, B., Hong, D.S.: High level operational support system. US Patent 7,302,612 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harada, Y., Tomita, Y., Sugiyama, S.: Operation support system and method. US Patent App. 10/278,886, 24 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aleem, M.I.: Auditing in TMF615 and its benefits. In: Wipro Council for Industry Research (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rader, Reinhard: Operations support systems for mission critical public safety communication networks. Bell Labs Tech. J. 16(3), 151–162 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ridgely, C.H., Wright III, S.L.: Method, computer program product, and apparatus for providing a universal high speed link for operation support system data. US Patent 7,796,641 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou, Y., Dong, Y., Huang, X, Yoshikawa, H.: A human interface toolkit for developing operation support system of complex industrial systems with IVI-COM technology. In: Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting with Information, pp. 82–89. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi, C.-S., Seo, D.-I.: On the study of service security model for privacy using global user management framework. In: Advanced Communication Technology, 2006. ICACT 2006. The 8th International Conference, vol. 1, pp. 4-pp. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kadowaki, K., Fujita, S.: A dynamic user management in networked consumer electronics via authentication proxies. In: Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, 2009 International Conference on, pp. 195–200. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Strassner, J., Raymer, D.: Implementing next generation services using policy-based management and autonomic computing principles. In: Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2006. NOMS 2006. 10th IEEE/IFIP, pp. 1–15. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kasuya, H., Muneshima, R.: Operation support system. US Patent App. 13/957,599 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tselentis, G.: Towards the Future Internet: A European Research Perspective. IOS press, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gupta, A.: Network management: current trends and future perspectives. J. Netw. Syst. Manag. 14(4), 483–491 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gotanda, M., Nakamura, T., Uchikubo, A.: Operation support system. US Patent App. 12/114,525 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyners, M., Driss, B., Feger, U.: TMF615 oss identity management. TM Forum Case Study, pp. 1–11 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melike Yigit
    • 1
  • Muhammed Macit
    • 1
  • V. Cagri Gungor
    • 1
    • 2
  • Taskin Kocak
    • 1
  • Oguz Ozhan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringBahcesehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringAGUKayseriTurkey
  3. 3.Alcatel-Lucent, TeletasIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations