Advertisement

Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 64–70 | Cite as

Near Field Enhancements from Angled Surface Defects; A Comparison of Scanning Laser Source and Scanning Laser Detection Techniques

  • B. Dutton
  • A. R. Clough
  • R. S. Edwards
Article

Abstract

Enhancement of the Rayleigh wave signal amplitude at a surface defect, due to interference of incident, reflected and mode converted waves, has been reported by several authors, and it has been suggested that this could be used as a fingerprint of the presence of such cracking. The scanning laser line source technique in particular, where signal amplitude is enhanced as the laser generating the Rayleigh waves is in the region of a surface defect, has been reported as a suitable detection tool. However, the previous work has looked primarily at defects propagating normal to the surface, which may not always be a suitable approximation, and the enhancement measured when a detection laser rather than a generation laser is near a crack may, in some cases, be more significant. This work explores near field effects for both laser generation and laser detection points near a defect, and compares the enhancements for defects which are angled relative to the surface. We use a combination of finite element method models and experimental results, and probe enhancements of both the amplitude and frequency signals, and show that scanning the detection point may be a better method for locating surface defects if they are inclined at an angle to the surface.

Keywords

Rayleigh wave Enhancement Surface defect NDT Ultrasound 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jian, X., Dixon, S., Guo, N., Edwards, R.: Rayleigh wave interaction with surface-breaking cracks. J. Appl. Phys. 101(6), 064906 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kromine, A.K., Fomitchov, P.A., Krishnaswamy, S., Achenbach, J.D.: Laser ultrasonic detection of surface breaking discontinuities: Scanning laser source technique. Mater. Eval. 58(2), 173 (2000) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan, Y., Dixon, S., Edwards, R.S., Jian, X.: Ultrasonic surface wave propagation and interaction with surface defects on rail track head. NDT E Int. 40(6), 471 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edwards, R.S., Jian, X., Fan, Y., Dixon, S.: Rail defect detection using ultrasonic surface waves. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vols. 25A/B. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 820, pp. 1601–1608 (2005) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeong, H., Park, M.C.: Finite-element analysis of laser-generated ultrasounds for wave propagation and interaction with surface-breaking cracks. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 16(1), 1 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sohn, Y., Krishnaswamy, S.: Interaction of a scanning laser-generated ultrasonic line source with a surface-breaking flaw. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115(1), 172 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sohn, Y., Krishnaswamy, S.: A near-field scanning laser source technique and a microcantilever ultrasound receiver for detection of surface-breaking defects. Meas. Sci. Technol. 17(4), 809 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vu, B.Q., Kinra, V.K.: Diffraction of Rayleigh-waves in a half-space 1. Normal edge crack. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77(4), 1425–1430 (1985) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edwards, R.S., Dixon, S., Jian, X.: Depth gauging of defects using low frequency wideband Rayleigh waves. Ultrasonics 44(1), 93 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, J.S., Xu, X.D., Liu, X.J., Xu, G.C.: A tuneable acoustic filter made by periodical structured materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(18), 181908 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edwards, R.S., Jian, X., Fan, Y., Dixon, S.: Signal enhancement of the in-plane and out-of-plane Rayleigh wave components. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(19), 194104 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dixon, S., Cann, B., Carroll, D.L., Fan, Y., Edwards, R.S.: Non-linear enhancement of laser generated ultrasonic Rayleigh waves by cracks. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 23(1), 25 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scruby, C.B., Drain, L.E.: Laser Ultrasonics: Techniques and Applications. Adam Hilger, Bristol (1990) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arias, I., Achenbach, J.D.: A model for the ultrasonic detection of surface-breaking cracks by the scanning laser source technique. Wave Motion 39(1), 61 (2004) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kinra, V.K.: Diffraction of Rayleigh-waves in a half-space 2. Inclined edge crack. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79(6), 1688 (1986) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Budaev, B.V., Bogy, D.B.: Rayleigh-wave scattering by a wedge. Wave Motion 22(3), 239 (1995) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujii, K.: Rayleigh-wave scattering at various wedge corners—investigation in the wider range of wedge angles. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84(6), 1916 (1994) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dutton, B., Rosli, M.H., Edwards, R.S.: Defect feature extraction using surface wave interactions and time-frequency behaviour. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vols. 29A/B. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1211, pp. 647–654 (2010) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dutton, B., Clough, A.R., Rosli, M.H., Edwards, R.S.: Exploring surface wave interaction with angled defects in the near and far field. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2nd International Symposium of Laser-Ultrasonics, in press Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dutton, B., Clough, A.R., Rosli, M.H., Edwards, R.S.: Non-contact ultrasonic detection of angled surface defects. NDT E Int., in press Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Essex, S.D., Potter, M.D.G., Vann, R., Dixon, S.: Utilizing EBSD to validate and understand NDE techniques. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vols. 28A/B. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1096, pp. 1224–1231 (2009) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    PZFlex version 2.3, developed by Weidlinger Associates, Inc., http://www.pzflex.com/
  23. 23.
    Arias, I., Achenbach, J.D.: Thermoelastic generation of ultrasound by line-focused laser irradiation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40(25), 6917 (2003) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aindow, A.M., Dewhurst, R.J., Palmer, S.B.: Laser-generation of directional surface acoustic-wave pulses in metals. Opt. Commun. 42(2), 116 (1982) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hutchins, D.A.: Mechanisms of Pulsed Photoacoustic Generation. Can. J. Phys. 64(9), 1247 (1986) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein, M.B., Bacher, G.D., Grunnet-Jepsen, A., Wright, D., Moerner, W.E.: Homodyne detection of ultrasonic surface displacements using two-wave mixing in photorefractive polymers. Opt. Commun. 162(1–3), 79 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Viktorov, I.A.: Rayleigh and Lamb Waves: Physical Theory and Applications. Ultrasonic Technology. Plenum Press, New York (1967) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dutton, B., Clough, A.R., Edwards, R.S.: Ultrasound near field enhancement mechanism for angled surface defects. In preparation Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations