Sidedness in Carrying Objects Other than Infants Resembles Sidedness in Infant Cradling: A Two Nation Study of Gender Differences
- 214 Downloads
Studies have repeatedly documented that 60 to 80 % of adults cradle (or carry) infants on the left side of their bodies. However, very little is known about sidedness tendencies when carrying objects in general. The present naturalistic study examines sidedness among college students as they carried books and other “academic” objects on campus. Special attention was given to sidedness biases in the use of a cradling-like carrying style. Over 2,500 observations were made of non-infant object carrying by college students in Malaysia and the United States. In both countries, females used a cradling-like carrying style much more than did males, while males predominantly carried books beside the hip. Regarding sidedness, there were significant left sided biases in the use of a cradling-like style by females in both countries and by males in Malaysia. Other sidedness differences in object carrying were also found. The left sided bias in infant carrying documented in other studies roughly resembles what this study found regarding the carrying of objects bearing no resemblance to infants, especially by females. Theories for left sided biases in infant cradling need to account for why similar biases exist particularly among females when they are carrying inanimate objects.
KeywordsSidedness Infant cradling/carrying Cradling-like carrying style Sex differences Cross-cultural research
- Ahmad, Z. H., & Kadir, S. (2005). Ethnic conflict, prevention and management: The Malaysian case. In K. Snitwongse & W. S. Thompson (Eds.), Ethnic conflict in Southeast Asia (pp. 42–64). Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
- Bianki, V. L., & Filippova, E. B. (2001). Sex differences in lateralization of the animal brain. New York: Taylor and Francis (originally published in Russian).Google Scholar
- Damerose, E., & Vauclair, J. (2002). Posture and laterality in human and nonhuman primates: Asymmetries in maternal handling and the infant’s early motor asymmetries. In L. J. Rogers & M. Andrew (Eds.), Comparative vertebrate lateralization (pp. 306–362). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellis, L., Hershberger, S., Field, E., Wersinger, S., Pellis, S., Geary, D., et al. (2008). Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Papadatou-Pastou, M. (2011). Handedness and language lateralization: Why are we right-handed and left-brained? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 8, 248–265.Google Scholar
- Pew Forum. (2012). U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. http://religions.pewforum.org/reports (Accessed June 19, 2012).
- Salk, L. (1960). The effects of normal heartbeat sound on the behavior of the newborn infant: Implications for mental health. World Mental Health, 12, 168–175.Google Scholar
- Turnbull, O. H., & Bryson, H. E. (2001). The leftward cradling bias and hemispheric asymmetry for speech prosody. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 6, 21–28.Google Scholar
- Vieira, M. I., da Silva, S. V., Chaves, D. N., & Petroianu, A. (1996). Relação entre câncer de mama, sensibilidade mamária, amamentação e lateralidade cerebral. Revista Hospital Clinica, 51, 85–89.Google Scholar