Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 231–244 | Cite as

Sidedness in Carrying Objects Other than Infants Resembles Sidedness in Infant Cradling: A Two Nation Study of Gender Differences

  • Lee Ellis
  • Siti Nor Awang
  • Stephanie Larkin
Original Paper

Abstract

Studies have repeatedly documented that 60 to 80 % of adults cradle (or carry) infants on the left side of their bodies. However, very little is known about sidedness tendencies when carrying objects in general. The present naturalistic study examines sidedness among college students as they carried books and other “academic” objects on campus. Special attention was given to sidedness biases in the use of a cradling-like carrying style. Over 2,500 observations were made of non-infant object carrying by college students in Malaysia and the United States. In both countries, females used a cradling-like carrying style much more than did males, while males predominantly carried books beside the hip. Regarding sidedness, there were significant left sided biases in the use of a cradling-like style by females in both countries and by males in Malaysia. Other sidedness differences in object carrying were also found. The left sided bias in infant carrying documented in other studies roughly resembles what this study found regarding the carrying of objects bearing no resemblance to infants, especially by females. Theories for left sided biases in infant cradling need to account for why similar biases exist particularly among females when they are carrying inanimate objects.

Keywords

Sidedness Infant cradling/carrying Cradling-like carrying style Sex differences Cross-cultural research 

References

  1. Abel, E. L. (2010). Human left-sided cradling preferences for dogs. Psychological Reports, 107, 336–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, Z. H., & Kadir, S. (2005). Ethnic conflict, prevention and management: The Malaysian case. In K. Snitwongse & W. S. Thompson (Eds.), Ethnic conflict in Southeast Asia (pp. 42–64). Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  3. Alpers, G. W. (2008). Eye-catching: Right hemisphere attentional bias for emotional pictures. Laterality, 13, 158–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianki, V. L., & Filippova, E. B. (2001). Sex differences in lateralization of the animal brain. New York: Taylor and Francis (originally published in Russian).Google Scholar
  5. Bogren, L. Y. (1984). Side preference in women and men when holding their newborn child: Psychological background. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 69, 13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borod, J. C., Cicero, B. A., Obler, L. K., Welkowitz, J., Erhan, H. M., Santschi, C., et al. (1998). Right hemisphere emotional perception: Evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology Neuropsychology, 12, 446–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourne, V. J., & Todd, B. K. (2004). When left means right: An explanation of the left cradling bias in terms of right hemisphere specializations. Developmental Science, 7, 19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bundy, R. S. (1979). Effects of infant head position on side preferences in adult handling. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey, D. P., Smith, G., Smith, D. T., Shepherd, J. S., Ord, L., & Rutland, A. (2001). Footedness in world soccer: An analysis of France’98. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, 855–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crovitz, H. F., & Zener, K. (1962). A group-test for assessing hand-and eye-dominance. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 271–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Damerose, E., & Vauclair, J. (2002). Posture and laterality in human and nonhuman primates: Asymmetries in maternal handling and the infant’s early motor asymmetries. In L. J. Rogers & M. Andrew (Eds.), Comparative vertebrate lateralization (pp. 306–362). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Château, P. (1983). Left-side preference for holding and carrying newborn infants: Parental holding and carrying during the first week of life. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171, 241–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Château, P., & Andersson, Y. (1976). Left-sided perference for holding and carrying newborn infants, II: Doll-holding and carrying from 2 to 16 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 18, 738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Château, P., Holmberg, H., & Winberg, J. (1978). Leftside preference in holding and carrying newborn infants. I: Mothers holding and carrying during the first week of life. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 67, 169–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43, 1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donnot, J., & Vauclair, J. (2007). Infant holding preferences in maternity hospitals: Testing the hypothesis of the lateralized perception of emotions. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 881–890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis, L. (2011). Identifying and explaining apparent universal sex differences in cognition and behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, L., Hershberger, S., Field, E., Wersinger, S., Pellis, S., Geary, D., et al. (2008). Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Firebaugh, G., & Dorius, S. F. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social Forces, 88, 1941–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galobardes, B., Bernstein, M. S., & Morabia, A. (1999). The association between switching hand preference and the declining prevalence of left-handedness with age. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1873–1875.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenwood, D. J. G., Greenwood, J. J. D., McCullagh, J. F., Beggs, J., & Murphy, C. A. (2007). A survey of sidedness in Northern Irish schoolchildren: The interaction of sex, age, and task. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain, and Cognition, 12, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris, L. J., Almerigi, J. B., Carbary, T. J., & Fogel, T. G. (2001). Left-side infant holding: A test of the hemispheric arousal-attentional hypothesis. Brain and Cognition, 46, 159–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, L. J., Almerigi, J. B., & Kirsch, E. A. (2000). Side preference in adults for holding infants: Contributions of sex and handedness in a test of imagination. Brain and Cognition, 43, 246–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris, L. J., Cardenas, R. A., Spradlin, M. P, Jr, & Almerigi, J. B. (2010). Why are infants held on the left? A test of the attention hypothesis with a doll, a book, and a bag. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 15, 548–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, L. J., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1985). Lateral cradling preferences in men and women: Results from a photographic study. Journal of General Psychology, 112, 185–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris, L. J., Spradlin, M. P, Jr, & Almerigi, J. B. (2006). Mothers’ and fathers’ lateral biases for holding their newborn infants: A study of images from the World Wide Web. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 12, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hopkins, W. D., & De Lathouwers, M. (2006). Left nipple preferences in infant Pan paniscus and P. troglodytes. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 1653–1662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huheey, J. E. (1977). Concerning the origin of handedness in humans. Behavior Genetics, 7, 29–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenni, D. A., & Jenni, M. A. (1976). Carrying behavior in humans: Analysis of sex differences. Science, 194(4267), 859–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. La France, M., & Mayo, C. (1979). A review of nonverbal behaviors of women and men. Western Journal of Communication, 43, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lalumière, M. L., Blanchard, R., & Zucker, K. J. (2000). Sexual orientation and handedness in men and women: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 575–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lockard, J. S., Daley, P. C., & Gunderson, V. M. (1979). Maternal and paternal differences in infant carry: US and African data. American Naturalist, 113, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucas, M. D., Turnbull, O. H., & Kaplan-Solms, K. L. (1993). Laterality of cradling in relation to perception and expression of facial affect. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 347–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning, J. (1991). Sex differences in left-side infant holding: Results from family album photographs. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manning, J., & Chamberlain, A. T. (1991). Left-sided cradling and brain lateralization. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning, J., & Denman, J. (1994). Lateral cradling preferences in humans (Homo sapiens): Similarities within families. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 262–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manning, J., Lockard, J. S., Daley, P. C., & Gunderson, V. (1979). Maternal and paternal differences in infant carry: US and African data. American Naturalist, 113, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manning, J., Trivers, R., Thornhill, R., Singh, D., Denman, J., Eklo, M., et al. (1997). Ear asymmetry and left-side cradling. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, W. L. B., & Machado, A. H. (2005). Deriving estimates of contralateral footedness from prevalence rates in samples of Brazilian and non-Brazilian right-and left-handers. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain, and Cognition, 10, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matheson, A. E., & Turnbull, O. H. (1998). Visual determinants of the leftward cradling bias: A preliminary report. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 3, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2010). Testosterone and cortisol jointly regulate dominance: Evidence for a dual-hormone hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 898–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nakamichi, M. (1996). The left-side holding preference is not universal: Evidence from field observations in Madagascar. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakamichi, M., & Takeda, S. (1995). A child-holding thought experiment: Students prefer to imagine holding an infant on the left side of the body. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 687–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Negayama, K., Kawai, M., Yamamoto, H., Tomiwa, K., & Sakakihara, Y. (2010). Behavioral development of infant holding and its laterality in relation to mothers’ handedness and child-care attitude. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nishida, T. (1993). Left nipple sucking preference in wild chimpanzees. Ethology & Sociobiology, 14, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noonan, M., & Axelrod, S. (1989). The stability and inter-test consonance of lateral postural-motor biases in rats: Results and implications. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 52, 386–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Papadatou-Pastou, M. (2011). Handedness and language lateralization: Why are we right-handed and left-brained? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 8, 248–265.Google Scholar
  48. Papadatou-Pastou, M., Martin, M., Munafò, M. R., & Jones, G. V. (2008). Sex differences in left-handedness: A meta-analysis of 144 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 677–699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pew Forum. (2012). U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. http://religions.pewforum.org/reports (Accessed June 19, 2012).
  50. Polemikos, N., & Papaeliou, C. (2000). Sidedness preference as an index of organization of laterality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 1083–1090.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rausch, R., & Walsh, G. O. (1984). Right-hemisphere language dominance in right-handed epileptic patients. Archives of Neurology, 41, 1077–1080.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raymond, M., Pontier, D., Dufour, A. B., & Moller, A. P. (1996). Frequency-dependent maintenance of left handedness in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 263(1377), 1627–1633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reissland, N. (2000). The cradling bias in relation to pitch of maternal child-directed language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reissland, N., Hopkins, B., Helms, P., & Williams, B. (2009). Maternal stress and depression and the lateralisation of infant cradling. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 263–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rekers, G. A., & Mead, S. (1979). Human sex differences in carrying behaviors: A replication and extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 625–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saling, M. M., & Kaplan-Solms, K. (1989). On lateral asymmetry in cradling behaviour and breast sensitivity. Current Anthropology, 30, 210–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saling, M. M., & Tyson, G. (1981). Lateral cradling preferences in nulliparous females. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 139, 309–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Salk, L. (1960). The effects of normal heartbeat sound on the behavior of the newborn infant: Implications for mental health. World Mental Health, 12, 168–175.Google Scholar
  59. Senie, R. T., Saftlas, A. F., Brinton, L. A., & Hoover, R. N. (1993). Is breast size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor? Cancer Causes and Control, 4, 203–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sieratzki, J. S., & Woll, B. (1996). Why do mothers cradle babies on their left? The Lancet, 347, 1746–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sieratzki, J. S., & Woll, B. (2002). Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric perspectives on maternal cradling preferences. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 11, 170–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stables, D., & Hewitt, G. (1995). The effect of lateral asymmetries on breast feeding skills: Can midwives’ holding interventions overcome unilateral breast feeding problems. Midwifery, 11, 28–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steinmetz, H., Volkmann, J., Jäncke, L., & Freund, H. J. (2004). Anatomical left-right asymmetry of language-related temporal cortex is different in left-and right-handers. Annals of Neurology, 29, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Strauch, J. (1981). Multiple ethnicities in Malaysia: The shifting relevance of alternative Chinese categories. Modern Asian Studies, 15, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tomaszycki, M., Cline, C., Griffin, B., Maestripieri, D., & Hopkins, W. D. (1998). Maternal cradling and infant nipple preferences in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Developmental Psychobiology, 32, 305–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turnbull, O. H., & Bryson, H. E. (2001). The leftward cradling bias and hemispheric asymmetry for speech prosody. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 6, 21–28.Google Scholar
  67. Turnbull, O. H., & Lucas, M. D. (1996). Is the leftward cradling bias related to lateral asymmetries of attention? Journal of Genetic Psychology, 157, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turnbull, O. H., Rhys-Jones, S. L., & Jackson, A. L. (2001). The leftward cradling bias and prosody: An investigation of cradling preferences in the deaf community. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 178–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Meer, A., & Husby, Å. (2006). Handedness as a major determinant of functional cradling bias. Laterality, 11, 263–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Vauclair, J., & Donnot, J. (2005). Infant holding biases and their relations to hemispheric specializations for perceiving facial emotions. Neuropsychologia, 43, 564–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vieira, M. I., da Silva, S. V., Chaves, D. N., & Petroianu, A. (1996). Relação entre câncer de mama, sensibilidade mamária, amamentação e lateralidade cerebral. Revista Hospital Clinica, 51, 85–89.Google Scholar
  72. Warren, D., Stern, M., Duggirala, R., Dyer, T., & Almasy, L. (2006). Heritability and linkage analysis of hand, foot, and eye preference in Mexican Americans. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain, and Cognition, 11, 508–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weiland, J. H., & Sperber, Z. (1970). Patterns of mother-infant contact: The significance of lateral preference. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 117, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and SociologyUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Saddleback CollegeMission ViejoUSA

Personalised recommendations