Adult Attachment Orientation and Implicit Behavioral Mimicry
- 650 Downloads
We investigated whether adult attachment orientation predicted the extent to which individuals engaged in implicit behavioral mimicry of a confederate presented by video. Results demonstrated that following an attachment threat prime: (1) those low in attachment anxiety and high in attachment avoidance showed less mimicry of face-rubbing gestures than individuals low in both attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety; (2) those high in attachment anxiety and low in attachment avoidance showed less mimicry of face-rubbing gestures than individuals low in both attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety. Importantly, attachment orientation did not predict baseline levels of face-rubbing gesturing, demonstrating that attachment orientation had an effect on mimicry rather than overall behavior expression. Attachment anxiety was positively related to attraction to the confederate such that those higher in attachment anxiety rated the confederate as more attractive. The findings are discussed with reference to both the mimicry and attachment literatures.
KeywordsImplicit behavioral mimicry Adult attachment orientation Attachment anxiety Attachment avoidance Affiliation
This research was funded by a Nuffield Foundation Social Sciences Small grant SGS36596 to Natalie Hall and Abigail Millings. The authors would like to thank Lia Emanuel and Lauren Cousins for their help with data coding.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, N. L., Guichard, A. C., Ford, M. B., & Feeney, B. C. (2006). Working models of attachment: New developments and emerging themes. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 196–239). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, N., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In D. Perlman & K. Bartholomew (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 53–90). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
- Emanuel, L. L. (2011). Nonconscious behavioural mimicry: Examining the methods used to produce mimicry and the automatic nature of the effect. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar
- Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, O. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509–523. doi: 10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Rowe, A. C., Carnelley, K. B., & Willis, H. (2012). Repeated priming of attachment security to keep self-views robust under attachment threat. Unpublished raw data, Universities of Bristol, Southampton, and Gloucester & Cheltenham.Google Scholar