The rapidly increasing number of kidney transplantations warrants assessment of anesthesia care in this patient population. We explored the frequency of arterial catheter (AC), central venous catheter (CVC) and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) placement during kidney transplantation in the USA using data from the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry (NACOR) and assessed the between-facility variation in the frequency of catheter placement. We defined cases of kidney transplantation using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification Software. Placement of AC, CVC and PAC was defined by respective Current Procedural Terminology codes. The frequency of vascular catheter placement across facility types was compared using Pearson χ2 test. We identified 10,580 cases of kidney transplantation performed in 100 facilities from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. Placement of an AC was reported in 1700 (16.1%), CVC in 2580 (24.4%) and PAC in 50 (0.5%) of cases. The frequency of placement of specific types of catheters was statistically different across facility types (p < 0.001). Within individual facilities that reported at least 50 cases of kidney transplantation, the percentages of cases performed with AC, CVC and PAC ranged from 0% to 86%, 0% to 90% and 0% to 3%, respectively. Considerable between-facility variation in the frequency of AC, CVC and PAC placement during kidney transplantation raises concerns about the need for better practice standardization. Excess invasive monitoring may represent a safety risk as well as unnecessary additional cost. If kidney transplantation can be safely performed without an AC, CVC or PAC in most patients, facilities with above-average catheter placement rates may have an opportunity for measurable reduction in catheter-related perioperative complications. Optimizing perioperative monitoring is an important component of ensuring high functioning, high-value medical systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
Richard P. Dutton and Richard D. Urman serve on the Anesthesia Quality Institute’s Data Use Committee. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest. Richard D. Urman received funding for unrelated research from Merck, Medtronic, and Mallinckrodt.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was not required given the retrospective and de-identified nature of the data.
Schmid, S., and Jungwirth, B., Anaesthesia for renal transplant surgery: An update. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29:552–558, 2012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K., and Pace, N., Anaesthesia for renal transplantation: An update. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine 16:334–338, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SarinKapoor, H., Kaur, R., and Kaur, H., Anaesthesia for renal transplant surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:1354–1367, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mau, L. W., Liu, J., Qiu, Y. et al., Trends in patient characteristics and first-year medical costs of older incident hemodialysis patients, 1995-2005. Am J Kidney Dis 55:549–557, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Niemann, C. U., and Eilers, H., Abdominal organ transplantation. Minerva Anestesiol 76:266–275, 2010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ricaurte, L., Vargas, J., Lozano, E. et al., Anesthesia and kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 45:1386–1391, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
McGee, D. C., and Gould, M. K., Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348:1123–1133, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Parienti, J. J., Mongardon, N., Megarbane, B. et al., Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med 373:1220–1229, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Marik, P. E., and Cavallazzi, R., Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? an updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 41:1774–1781, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bacchi, G., Buscaroli, A., Fusari, M. et al., The influence of intraoperative central venous pressure on delayed graft function in renal transplantation: A single-center experience. Transplant Proc 42:3387–3391, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Othman, M. M., Ismael, A. Z., and Hammouda, G. E., The impact of timing of maximal crystalloid hydration on early graft function during kidney transplantation. Anesth Analg 110:1440–1446, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, M., Luisetti, T., and London, M. J., Radial artery cannulation: A comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations. Anesth Analg 109:1763–1781, 2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gershengorn, H. B., Wunsch, H., Scales, D. C. et al., Association between arterial catheter use and hospital mortality in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med 174:1746–1754, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hsu, D. J., Feng, M., Kothari, R. et al., The association between indwelling arterial catheters and mortality in hemodynamically stable patients with respiratory failure: A propensity score analysis. Chest 148:1470–1476, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Ikuta, K., Wang, Y., Robinson, A. et al., National trends in use and outcomes of pulmonary artery catheters among medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2013. JAMA Cardiol 2:908–913, 2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Brovman, E. Y., Gabriel, R. A., Dutton, R. P. et al., Pulmonary artery catheter use during cardiac surgery in the united states, 2010 to 2014. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 30:579–584, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Collange, O., Jazaerli, L., Lejay, A. et al., Intraoperative pleth variability index is linked to delayed graft function after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 48:2615–2621, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lee, H. C., Tsai, Y. F., Tsai, H. I. et al., Pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index is a reliable indicator of cardiac preload in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 48:1055–1058, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, D., Sahu, S., Chandra, A. et al., Effect of intraoperative transesophageal doppler-guided fluid therapy versus central venous pressure-guided fluid therapy on renal allograft outcome in patients undergoing living donor renal transplant surgery: A comparative study. J Anesth 29:842–849, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar