Migration of Patients Between Five Urban Teaching Hospitals in Chicago
- 351 Downloads
To quantify the extent of patient sharing and inpatient care fragmentation among patients discharged from a cohort of Chicago hospitals. Admission and discharge dates and patient ZIP codes from 5 hospitals over 2 years were matched with an encryption algorithm. Admission to more than one hospital was considered fragmented care. The association between fragmentation and socio-economic variables using ZIP-code data from the 2000 US Census was measured. Using validation from one hospital, patient matching using encrypted identifiers had a sensitivity of 99.3 % and specificity of 100 %. The cohort contained 228,151 unique patients and 334,828 admissions. Roughly 2 % of the patients received fragmented care, accounting for 5.8 % of admissions and 6.4 % of hospital days. In 3 of 5 hospitals, and overall, the length of stay of patients with fragmented care was longer than those without. Fragmentation varied by hospital and was associated with the proportion of non-Caucasian persons, the proportion of residents whose income fell in the lowest quartile, and the proportion of residents with more children being raised by mothers alone in the zip code of the patient. Patients receiving fragmented care accounted for 6.4 % of hospital days. This percentage is a low estimate for our region, since not all regional hospitals participated, but high enough to suggest value in creating Health Information Exchange. Fragmentation varied by hospital, per capita income, race and proportion of single mother homes. This secure methodology and fragmentation analysis may prove useful for future analyses.
KeywordsHealth information exchange Health information technology Fragmentation of care
This project was supported by grant number U18HS016973 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. This project was also supported by the Chicago Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center (CHITREC).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 5.Cwinn MA, Forster AJ, Cwinn AA, et al. Prevalence of information gaps for seniors transferred from nursing homes to the emergency department. CJEM 2009;11:462–71.Google Scholar
- 10.Kim J, Chuun D, Shah A, et al. Prevalence and impact of information gaps in the emergency department. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:866.Google Scholar
- 11.Stiell A, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, et al. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. CMAJ 2003;169:1023–8.Google Scholar
- 12.http://www.surescripts.com/about-e-prescribing/progress-reports/state.aspx?state=il. Accessed 5/21/2011.
- 15.Kho AN, Lemmon L, Commiskey M, et al. Use of a regional health information exchange to detect crossover of patients with MRSA between urban hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):212–6.Google Scholar
- 16.Arrow K, Auerbach A, Bertko J, et al. Toward a 21st-Century Health Care System: Recommendations for Health Care Reform. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 2.Google Scholar
- 17.Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, et al. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun; Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18.Google Scholar
- 20.Personal experience WG.Google Scholar
- 21.Grannis SJ, Biondich PG, Mamlin BW, et al. How disease surveillance systems can serve as practical building blocks for a health information infrastructure: the Indiana experience. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:286–90.Google Scholar
- 22.Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):666–71.Google Scholar
- 24.United Kingdom. UK NHS. A one-way encryption function to hide person-identifiable information. 15 July 2002. 11 Nov 2008 <www.nibhi.org.uk>.
- 25.United States Census Bureau: Census 2000 5-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) Cartographic Boundary Files. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/z52000.html Accessed February 21, 2011.
- 26.ESRI’s ArcGIS® 10, http://www.esri.com/
- 27.Jenks, George F. 1967. “The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping”, International Yearbook of Cartography 7: 186–190.Google Scholar
- 28.http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//00s50000001r000000.htm Accessed May 27, 2011.
- 30.http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DownloadDatasetServlet?_lang=en. Accessed 3/2011.
- 31.http://www.ihatoday.org/hospital-directory.aspx. Accessed 5/2011.
- 35.Ejlertsson G. Assessment of patient/doctor continuity in primary health care. JR Coll Gen Pract 1980;7.Google Scholar