Mobile Clinical Decision Support Systems and Applications: A Literature and Commercial Review

  • Borja Martínez-Pérez
  • Isabel de la Torre-Díez
  • Miguel López-Coronado
  • Beatriz Sainz-de-Abajo
  • Montserrat Robles
  • Juan Miguel García-Gómez


The latest advances in eHealth and mHealth have propitiated the rapidly creation and expansion of mobile applications for health care. One of these types of applications are the clinical decision support systems, which nowadays are being implemented in mobile apps to facilitate the access to health care professionals in their daily clinical decisions. The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, to make a review of the current systems available in the literature and in commercial stores. Secondly, to analyze a sample of applications in order to obtain some conclusions and recommendations. Two reviews have been done: a literature review on Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Knowledge and PubMed and a commercial review on Google play and the App Store. Five applications from each review have been selected to develop an in-depth analysis and to obtain more information about the mobile clinical decision support systems. Ninety-two relevant papers and 192 commercial apps were found. Forty-four papers were focused only on mobile clinical decision support systems. One hundred seventy-one apps were available on Google play and 21 on the App Store. The apps are designed for general medicine and 37 different specialties, with some features common in all of them despite of the different medical fields objective. The number of mobile clinical decision support applications and their inclusion in clinical practices has risen in the last years. However, developers must be careful with their interface or the easiness of use, which can impoverish the experience of the users.


Mobile applications Apps Clinical decision support mHealth 



Clinical decision support system


Clinical standard work


Cardiovascular disease


Embedded gait analysis using intelligent technology


Endstage kidney disease


Global observatory for eHealth


Hoehn & Yahr


Imperial antibiotic prescribing policy


IgA nephropathy


Parkinson’s disease


Personal digital assistant


Partial thromboplastin time


Quality of experience


Radio-frequency identification


Systematic coronary risk evaluation


Unified Parkinson disease rating scale


World health organization



This research has been partially supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain. This research has been partially supported by the ICT-248765 EU-FP7 Project. This research has been partially supported by the IPT-2011-1126-900000 project under the INNPACTO 2011 program, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Van De Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Berben, S. A., and Schoonhoven, L., Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010:12(2), 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M., and Jadad, A., What is eHealth (3): A systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 7(1):1, 2005. PMID: 15829471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization (2011) mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies: Based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Volume 3). World Health Organization. 2011. ISBN: 9789241564250Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin, C., Mobile telemedicine: A survey study. J Med Syst April 36(2):511–520, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El Khaddar, M.A., Harroud, H., Boulmalf, M., Elkoutbi, M., Habbani, A., Emerging wireless technologies in e-health Trends, challenges, and framework design issues. 2012 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS). 440–445, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luanrattana, R., Win, K. T., Fulcher, J., and Iverson, D., Mobile technology use in medical education. J Med Syst 36(1):113–122, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, S. C., Mobile applications and 4 G wireless networks: A framework for analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems 29(5):344–357, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, B., Singh, S.P., Mohan, A., Emerging mobile communication technologies for health. 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology, ICCCT-2010; Allahabad; pp. 828–832, 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan, H., Huo, H., Xu, Y., and Gidlund, M., Wireless sensor network based E-health system—implementation and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 56(4):2288–2295, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IDC (2013) Press release: Strong demand for smartphones and heated vendor competition characterize the worldwide mobile phone market at the end of 2012. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  11. 11.
    IDC (2012) IDC Raises its worldwide tablet forecast on continued strong demand and forthcoming new product launches. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  12. 12.
    International Data Corporation (2013) Android and iOS combine for 91.1 % of the worldwide smartphone OS market in 4Q12 and 87.6 % for the year. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  13. 13.
    Jones, C., (2013) Apple and Google continue to gain US Smartphone market share. Forbes. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  14. 14.
    Apple (2013) iTunes. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  15. 15.
    Google (2013) Google play. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  16. 16.
    Rowinski, D., (2013) The data doesn’t lie: iOS apps are better than android. Readwrite mobile. Accessed 11 September 2013.
  17. 17.
    Rajan, S. P., and Rajamony, S., Viable investigations and real-time recitation of enhanced ECG-based cardiac telemonitoring system for homecare applications: A systematic evaluation. Telemed J E Health 19(4):278–286, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Logan, A. G., Transforming hypertension management using mobile health technology for telemonitoring and self-care support. Can J Cardiol 29(5):579–585, 2013.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tamrat, T., and Kachnowski, S., Special delivery: An analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J 16(5):1092–1101, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., López-Coronado, M., and Herreros-González, J., Mobile Apps in Cardiology: Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 1(2):e15, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Wit HA, Mestres Gonzalvo C, Hurkens KP, Mulder WJ, Janknegt R, et al., Development of a computer system to support medication reviews in nursing homes. Int J Clin Pharm. 26, 2013.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dahlström, O., Thyberg, I., Hass, U., Skogh, T., and Timpka, T., Designing a decision support system for existing clinical organizational structures: Considerations from a rheumatology clinic. J Med Syst 30(5):325–31, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambin P, Roelofs E, Reymen B, Velazquez ER, Buijsen J, et al., ‘Rapid learning health care in oncology’ - An approach towards decision support systems enabling customised radiotherapy’. Radiother Oncol. 27, 2013.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Graham, T. A., Bullard, M. J., Kushniruk, A. W., Holroyd, B. R., and Rowe, B. H., Assessing the sensibility of two clinical decision support systems. J Med Syst 32(5):361–8, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., and López-Coronado, M., Mobile health applications for the most prevalent conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and analysis. J Med Internet Res 15(6):e120, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Savel, T. G., Lee, B. A., Ledbetter, G., Brown, S., LaValley, D., et al., PTT advisor: A CDC-supported initiative to develop a mobile clinical laboratory decision support application for the iOS platform. Online J Public Health Inform 5(2):215, 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doctor Doctor Inc. (2009) iDoc. iTunes. Accessed 13 September 2013.
  28. 28.
    Hardyman, W., Bullock, A., Brown, A., Carter-Ingram, S., and Stacey, M., Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: An evaluation. BMC Med Educ 13:6, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee, N. J., Chen, E. S., Currie, L. M., Donovan, M., Hall, E. K., et al., The effect of a mobile clinical decision support system on the diagnosis of obesity and overweight in acute and primary care encounters. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 32(3):211–21, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Divall, P., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., and Baker, R., The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 19(1):16–28, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chignell, M, and Yesha, Y, Lo, J., New methods for clinical decision support in hospitals. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (CASCON’10). Toronto, ON; Canada, 2010Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charani, E., Kyratsis, Y., Lawson, W., Wickens, H., Brannigan, E. T., et al., An analysis of the development and implementation of a smartphone application for the delivery of antimicrobial prescribing policy: Lessons learnt. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(4):960–7, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klucken, J., Barth, J., Kugler, P., Schlachetzki, J., Henze, T., et al., Unbiased and mobile gait analysis detects motor impairment in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 8(2):e56956, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hervás, R., Fontecha, J., Ausín, D., Castanedo, F., Bravo, J., et al., Mobile monitoring and reasoning methods to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Sensors (Basel) 13(5):6524–41, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Di Noia, T., Ostuni, V. C., Pesce, F., Binetti, G., Naso, N., et al., An end stage kidney disease predictor based on an artificial neural networks ensemble. Expert Syst Appl 40(11):4438–4445, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Velikova, M., van Scheltinga, J. T., Lucas, P. J. F., and Spaanderman, M., Exploiting causal functional relationships in Bayesian network modelling for personalised healthcare. Int J Approx Reason, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.016.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Medical Data Solutions (2012) Pediatric clinical pathways. Google play. Accessed 17 September 2013.
  38. 38.
    QxMD Medical Software Inc. (2013) Calculate by QxMD. Google play. Accessed 17 September 2013.
  39. 39.
    Skyscape (2012) ACC pocket guides. Google play. Accessed 17 September 2013.
  40. 40.
    Skyscape (2013) Skyscape medical resources. Google play. Accessed 17 September 2013.
  41. 41.
    Pieter Kubben, M.D., (2012) NeuroMind. Google play. Accessed 17 September 2013.
  42. 42.
    Mobile Systems, Inc. (2013) 2013 Medical diagnosis TR. Google play. Accessed 17 September 2013.
  43. 43.
    World Health Organization (2013) The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Accessed 18 September 2013.
  44. 44.
    Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., Candelas-Plasencia, S., and López-Coronado, M., Development and evaluation of tools for measuring the Quality of Experience (QoE) in mHealth applications. J Med Syst 37(5):9976, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Borja Martínez-Pérez
    • 1
  • Isabel de la Torre-Díez
    • 1
  • Miguel López-Coronado
    • 1
  • Beatriz Sainz-de-Abajo
    • 1
  • Montserrat Robles
    • 2
  • Juan Miguel García-Gómez
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Signal Theory and Communications, and Telematics EngineeringUniversity of ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Biomedical Informatics Group, Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA)Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations