Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease using the Scale-Invariant Feature Transforms in Magnetic Resonance Images

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present an automated method for diagnosing Alzheimer disease (AD) from brain MR images. The approach uses the scale-invariant feature transforms (SIFT) extracted from different slices in MR images for both healthy subjects and subjects with Alzheimer disease. These features are then clustered in a group of features which they can be used to transform a full 3-dimensional image from a subject to a histogram of these features. A feature selection strategy was used to select those bins from these histograms that contribute most in classifying the two groups. This was done by ranking the features using the Fisher’s discriminant ratio and a feature subset selection strategy using the genetic algorithm. These selected bins of the histograms are then used for the classification of healthy/patient subjects from MR images. Support vector machines with different kernels were applied to the data for the discrimination of the two groups, namely healthy subjects and patients diagnosed by AD. The results indicate that the proposed method can be used for diagnose of AD from MR images with the accuracy of %86 for the subjects aged from 60 to 80 years old and with mild AD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Villain, N., Desgranges, B., Viader, F., De la Sayettte, V., Mezenge, F., Landeau, B., Baron, J.-C., Eustache, F., and Chetelat, G., Relationships between Hippocampal Atrophy, White Matter Disruption, and Grey Matter Hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 28(24):6174–6181, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiu, A., Fennema-Notestine, C., Dale, A. M., and Miller, M. I., Regional shape abnormalities in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuroimage 45(3):656–661, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishii, K., Kawachi, T., Sasaki, H., Kono, A. K., Fukuda, T., Kojima, Y., and Mori, E., Voxel-based morphometric comparison between early- and late-onset mild Alzheimer’ disease and assessment of diagnostic performance of Z score images. Am J Neuroradiol 26:333–340, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Toews, M., Wells, W. M., Collins, D. L., and Arbel, T., Feature-based morphometry: discovering group-related anatomical patterns. Neuroimage 49(3):2318–2327, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris, C., Stephens, M., A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference. pp. 147–151, 1988.

  6. Rohr, K., On 3D differential operators for detecting point landmarks. Image Vis Comput 15(3):219–233, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe, D. G., Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MacKay, D., Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

  9. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., Stork, D. G., Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

  10. Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K., Pattern recognition, 4th Edition. Academic Press, 2009.

  11. Webb, A. R., Statistical pattern recognition, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

  12. Goldberg, D. E., Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, 1989.

  13. Burges, C. J. C., A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 2:121–167, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vapnik, V. N., The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, 1995.

  15. Hsu, C.-W., and Lin, C.-J., A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(2):415–425, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcus, D., Wang, T., Parker, J., Csernansky, J., Morris, J., and Buckner, R., Open access series of imaging studies (oasis): Cross-sectional MRI data in young, Middle aged, nondemented and demented older adults. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1498–1507, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Talairach, J., and Tournoux, P., Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buckner, R., Head, D., Parker, J., Fotenos, A., Marcus, D., Morris, J., and Snyder, A., A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated Atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 23:724–738, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Evgeniou, T., Pontil, M., and Elisseeff, A., Leave one out error, stability, and generalization of voting combinations of classifiers. J Mach Learn 55(1):71–97, 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Daliri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daliri, M.R. Automated Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease using the Scale-Invariant Feature Transforms in Magnetic Resonance Images. J Med Syst 36, 995–1000 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9738-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9738-6

Keywords

Navigation