Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of a Multi-functional Ambulatory Urodynamics Monitoring System Based on Newly Devised Abdominal Pressure Measurement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of the rectal pressure is considered to be the ‘gold standard’ for the assessment of the abdominal pressure. However, conventional rectal catheters can cause erroneous results and are not comfortable for the patients. To reduce these problems, we devised a non-invasive technique for the measurement of the abdominal pressure using the parametric curve fitting method, based on linear, polynomial, exponential or sine equation modeling, between the rectal pressure and electromyographic (sEMG) signals recorded simultaneously from the abdomen. The sEMG signals and rectal pressure were obtained simultaneously from 12 patients with neurogenic bladders due to spinal cord injury (age = 53.2 ± 11.9 years, BMI = 24.4 ± 2.7, ASIA classification: D). Using our algorithm, the correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) between the measured and estimated abdominal pressure obtained by the quartic polynomial modeling were 0.86 ± 0.05 and 4.70 ± 1.56, respectively. The results obtained herein suggest that the sEMG signals can be used reliably for the indirect measurement of the abdominal pressure in ambulatory urodynamics monitoring systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schafer, W., Abrams, P., Liao, L., Mattiasson, A., Pesce, F., Spangberg, A., Sterling, A. M., Zinner, N. R., and Van Kerrebroeck, P., Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol. Urodyn. 21:261–274, 2002. doi:10.1002/nau.10066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Webb, R. J., Ramsden, P. D., and Neal, D. E., Ambulatory monitoring and electronics measurement of urinary leakage in the diagnosis of detrusor instability and incontinence. Br. J. Urol. 68:148–152, 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1991.tb15283.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Radley, S. C., Rosario, D. J., Chapple, C. R., and Farkas, A. G., Conventional and ambulatory urodynamic findings in women with symptoms suggestive of bladder overactivity. J. Urol. 166:2253–2258, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65545-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosario, D. J., Macdiarmid, S. A., Radley, S. C., and Chapple, C. R., A comparison of ambulatory and conventional urodynamic studies in men with borderline outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 83:400–409, 1999. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00927.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sunjay, J., Timothy, J., and Derek, T., Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring has a useful role in men with an equivocal or failed conventional study. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 1:51, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malbrain, M. L. N. G., Different technique to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Intensive Care Med. 30:357–371, 2004. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-2107-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Doorn, E. W., Anders, K., Khullar, V., Kulsenh-Hanssen, S., Pesce, F., Robertson, A., Rosario, D., and Schafer, W., Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society for ambulatory urodynamic studies. Neurourol. Urodyn. 19:113–125, 2000. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(2000)19:2<113::AID-NAU2>3.0.CO;2-#.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ridings, P. C., Bloomfield, G. L., and Blocher, C. R., Cardiopulmonary effects of raised intra-abdominal pressure before and after intravascular volume expansion. J. Trauma. 39:1071–1075, 1995. doi:10.1097/00005373-199512000-00010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson, J. A., O’Sullivan, P. B., Briffa, N. K., and Neumann, P., Altered muscle activation patterns in symptomatic women during pelvic floor muscle contraction and Valsalva manoeuvre. Neurourol. Urodyn. 25:268–276, 2006. doi:10.1002/nau.20183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McBeth, P. B., Zygun, D. A., Widder, S., Cheatham, M., Zengerink, I., Glowa, J., and Kirkpatrick, A. W., Effect of patient positioning on intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Am. J. Surg. 193:644–647, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDonald, A., Paterson, P. J., Baxter, J. N., and Finlay, I. G., Relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and intra-rectal pressure in the proctometrogram. Br. J. Surg. 80:1070–1071, 1993. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800800852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neumann, P., and Gill, V., Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int. Urogynecol. J. 13:125–132, 2002. doi:10.1007/s001920200027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Demaria, F., Porcher, R., Ismael, S. S., Amarenco, G., Fritel, X., Madelenat, P., and Benifla, J. L., Using intercostals muscle EMG to quantify maternal expulsive efforts during vaginal delivery: A pilot study. Neurourol. Urodyn. 23:675–678, 2004. doi:10.1002/nau.20050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amarenco, G., Ismael, S. S., Lagauche, D., Raibaut, P., Rene-Corail, P., Wolff, N., Thoumie, P., and Haab, F., Couch anal reflex: Strict relationship between intravesical pressure and pelvic floor muscle electromyography activity during cough. Urol. 173:149–152, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu, K., Novara, C., Vincent, T., Milanese, M., and Poolla, K., Parametric and nonparametric curve fitting. Automatica. 42:1869–1873, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2006.05.024.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Rangayyan, R. M., Biomedical signal analysis. Wiley, New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American Spinal Injury Association, Reference manual for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association, Chicago, IL, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abrams, P., Cardozo, L., Fall, M., Griffiths, D., Rosier, P., Ulmsten, U., Van Kerrbroeck, P., Victor, A., and Wein, A., The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 21:167–178, 2002. doi:10.1002/nau.10052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan, J., Lewis, P., Williams, T., Shepherd, A. M., and Abrams, P., Quality control in urodynamics. BJU Int. 91:201–207, 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04054.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nordander, C., Willner, J., Hansson, G. A., Larsson, B., Unge, J., Granquist, L., and Skerfving, S., Influence of the subcutaneous fat layer, as measured by ultrasound, skinfold calipers and BMI, on the EMG amplitude. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 89:514–519, 2003. doi:10.1007/s00421-003-0819-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wyndaele, J. J., and Wachter, S. D., Cystometry sensory data from a normal population: Comparison of two groups of young healthy volunteers examined with 5 years interval. Eur. Urol. 42:34–38, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00221-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the second stage of the Brain Korea 21 Project in 2009 and a Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST; no. R01-2008-000-20089-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chul Gyu Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.S., Seo, J.H., Kang, J.U. et al. Implementation of a Multi-functional Ambulatory Urodynamics Monitoring System Based on Newly Devised Abdominal Pressure Measurement. J Med Syst 34, 1011–1021 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9318-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9318-1

Keywords

Navigation