Implementation of a Multi-functional Ambulatory Urodynamics Monitoring System Based on Newly Devised Abdominal Pressure Measurement
- 104 Downloads
The measurement of the rectal pressure is considered to be the ‘gold standard’ for the assessment of the abdominal pressure. However, conventional rectal catheters can cause erroneous results and are not comfortable for the patients. To reduce these problems, we devised a non-invasive technique for the measurement of the abdominal pressure using the parametric curve fitting method, based on linear, polynomial, exponential or sine equation modeling, between the rectal pressure and electromyographic (sEMG) signals recorded simultaneously from the abdomen. The sEMG signals and rectal pressure were obtained simultaneously from 12 patients with neurogenic bladders due to spinal cord injury (age = 53.2 ± 11.9 years, BMI = 24.4 ± 2.7, ASIA classification: D). Using our algorithm, the correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) between the measured and estimated abdominal pressure obtained by the quartic polynomial modeling were 0.86 ± 0.05 and 4.70 ± 1.56, respectively. The results obtained herein suggest that the sEMG signals can be used reliably for the indirect measurement of the abdominal pressure in ambulatory urodynamics monitoring systems.
KeywordsAbdominal pressure Natural filling cystometry Surface electromyography Parametric curve fitting
This work was supported by the second stage of the Brain Korea 21 Project in 2009 and a Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST; no. R01-2008-000-20089-0).
- 1.Schafer, W., Abrams, P., Liao, L., Mattiasson, A., Pesce, F., Spangberg, A., Sterling, A. M., Zinner, N. R., and Van Kerrebroeck, P., Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol. Urodyn. 21:261–274, 2002. doi: 10.1002/nau.10066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sunjay, J., Timothy, J., and Derek, T., Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring has a useful role in men with an equivocal or failed conventional study. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 1:51, 2002.Google Scholar
- 7.Van Doorn, E. W., Anders, K., Khullar, V., Kulsenh-Hanssen, S., Pesce, F., Robertson, A., Rosario, D., and Schafer, W., Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society for ambulatory urodynamic studies. Neurourol. Urodyn. 19:113–125, 2000. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(2000)19:2<113::AID-NAU2>3.0.CO;2-#.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rangayyan, R. M., Biomedical signal analysis. Wiley, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
- 17.American Spinal Injury Association, Reference manual for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association, Chicago, IL, 2003.Google Scholar
- 18.Abrams, P., Cardozo, L., Fall, M., Griffiths, D., Rosier, P., Ulmsten, U., Van Kerrbroeck, P., Victor, A., and Wein, A., The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 21:167–178, 2002. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Nordander, C., Willner, J., Hansson, G. A., Larsson, B., Unge, J., Granquist, L., and Skerfving, S., Influence of the subcutaneous fat layer, as measured by ultrasound, skinfold calipers and BMI, on the EMG amplitude. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 89:514–519, 2003. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0819-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar