Advertisement

Journal of Scientific Computing

, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 1180–1203 | Cite as

An Extrapolation Cascadic Multigrid Method Combined with a Fourth-Order Compact Scheme for 3D Poisson Equation

  • Kejia Pan
  • Dongdong He
  • Hongling Hu
Article

Abstract

Extrapolation cascadic multigrid (EXCMG) method is an efficient multigrid method which has mainly been used for solving the two-dimensional elliptic boundary value problems with linear finite element discretization in the existing literature. In this paper, we develop an EXCMG method to solve the three-dimensional Poisson equation on rectangular domains by using the compact finite difference (FD) method with unequal meshsizes in different coordinate directions. The resulting linear system from compact FD discretization is solved by the conjugate gradient (CG) method with a relative residual stopping criterion. By combining the Richardson extrapolation and tri-quartic Lagrange interpolation for the numerical solutions from two-level of grids (current and previous grids), we are able to produce an extremely accurate approximation of the actual numerical solution on the next finer grid, which can greatly reduce the number of relaxation sweeps needed. Additionally, a simple method based on the midpoint extrapolation formula is used for the fourth-order FD solutions on two-level of grids to achieve sixth-order accuracy on the entire fine grid cheaply and directly. The gradient of the numerical solution can also be easily obtained through solving a series of tridiagonal linear systems resulting from the fourth-order compact FD discretizations. Numerical results show that our EXCMG method is much more efficient than the classical V-cycle and W-cycle multigrid methods. Moreover, only few CG iterations are required on the finest grid to achieve full fourth-order accuracy in both the \(L^2\)-norm and \(L^{\infty }\)-norm for the solution and its gradient when the exact solution belongs to \(C^6\). Finally, numerical result shows that our EXCMG method is still effective when the exact solution has a lower regularity, which widens the scope of applicability of our EXCMG method.

Keywords

Richardson extrapolation Multigrid method Compact difference scheme Quartic interpolation Poisson equation 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65N06 65N55 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Kejia Pan was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41474103 and 41204082), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2014AA06A602), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (No. 2015JJ3148). Dongdong He was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11402174), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Program for Young Excellent Talents at Tongji University (No. 2013KJ012) and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry. Hongling Hu was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11301176). The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments to improve the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Strikwerda, J.C.: Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations. Chapman & Hall, London (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, M.M.: A fourth-order Poisson solver. J. Comput. Phys. 55, 166–172 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, M.M., Kouatchou, J.: Symbolic derivation of finite difference approximations for the three-dimensional Poisson equation. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 14, 593–606 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spotz, W.F., Carey, G.F.: A high-order compact formulation for the 3D poisson equation. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 12, 235–243 (1996)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sutmann, G., Steffen, B.: High-order compact solvers for the three-dimensional Poisson equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 187, 142–170 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, J., Zhong, W., Zhang, J.: A general meshsize fourth-order compact difference discretization scheme for 3D Poisson equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 183, 804–812 (2006)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta, M.M., Kouatchou, J., Zhang, J.: Comparison of second-order and fourth-order discretization for multigrid Poisson solvers. J. Comput. Phys. 132, 226–232 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Othman, M., Abdullah, A.R.: An efficient multigrid Poisson solver. Int. J. Comput. Math. 71, 541–553 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaffer, S.: High order multi-grid methods. Math. Comput. 43, 89–115 (1984)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, J.: Multigrid method and fourth-order compact scheme for 2D Poisson equation with unequal mesh-size discretization. J. Comput. Phys. 179, 170–179 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Y., Zhang, J.: Sixth-order compact scheme combined with multigrid method and extrapolation technique for 2D poisson equation. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 137–146 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, J.: Fast and high accuracy multigrid solution of the three dimensional Poisson equation. J. Comput. Phys. 143, 449–161 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ge, Y.B.: Multigrid method and fourth-order compact difference discretization scheme with unequal meshsizes for 3D poisson equation. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 6381–6391 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCormick, S.F. (ed.): Multigrid Methods. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Briggs, W.L., McCormick, S.F., Henson, V.E.: A Multigrid Tutorial, 2nd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trottenberg, U., Oosterlee, C.W., Schller, A.: Multigrid. Academic Press, London (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moghaderi, H., Dehghan, M., Hajarian, M.: A fast and efficient two-grid method for solving d-dimensional Poisson equations. Numer. Algorithms 72, 483–537 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Altas, I., Dym, J., Gupta, M.M., Manohar, R.P.: Multigrid solution of automatically generated high-order discretizations for the biharmonic equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19, 1575–1585 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, J., Sun, H., Zhao, J.J.: High order compact scheme with multigrid local mesh refinement procedure for convection diffusion problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Comput. 191, 4661–4674 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ge, Y.B., Cao, F.J.: Multigrid method based on the transformation-free HOC scheme on nonuniform grids for 2D convection diffusion problems. J. Comput. Phys. 230, 4051–4070 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, Y., Zhang, J.: Fast and robust sixth-order multigrid computation for the three-dimensional convection–diffusion equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234, 3496–3506 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bornemann, F.A., Deuflhard, P.: The cascadic multigrid method for elliptic problems. Numer. Math. 75, 135–152 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaidurov, V.: Some estimates of the rate of convergence for the cascadic conjugate-gradient method. Comput. Math. Appl. 31, 161–171 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Braess, D., Dahmen, W.: A cascadic multigrid algorithm for the Stokes equations. Numer. Math. 82, 179–191 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Timmermann, G.: A cascadic multigrid algorithm for semilinear elliptic problems. Numer. Math. 86, 717–731 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shaidurov, V., Tobiska, L.: The convergence of the cascadic conjugate- gradient method applied to elliptic problems in domains with re-entrant cor- ners. Math. Comput. 69, 501–520 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaidurov, V., Timmermann, G.: A cascadic multigrid algorithm for semi-linear indefinite elliptic problems. Computing 64, 349–366 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shi, Z.C., Xu, X.J.: Cascadic multigrid for parabolic problems. J. Comput. Math. 18, 551–560 (2000)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Braess, D., Deuflhard, P., Lipnikov, K.: A subspace cascadic multigrid method for mortar elements. Computing 69, 205–225 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stevenson, R.: Nonconforming finite elements and the cascadic multi-grid method. Numer. Math. 91, 351–387 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou, S.Z., Hu, H.X.: On the convergence of a cascadic multigrid method for semilinear elliptic problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 159, 407417 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Du, Q., Ming, P.B.: Cascadic multigrid methods for parabolic problems. Sci. China Ser. A Math. 51, 1415–1439 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu, X.J., Chen, W.B.: Standard and economical cascadic multigrid methods for the mortar finite element methods. Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 2, 180–201 (2009)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu, H.X., Zeng, J.P.: A cascadic multigrid method for a kind of semilinear elliptic problem. Numer. Algorithms 58, 143–162 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shi, Z.C., Xu, X.J., Huang, Y.Q.: Economical cascadic multigrid method (ECMG). Sci. China Ser. A Math. 50(12), 1765–1780 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen, C.M., Hu, H.L., Xie, Z.Q., et al.: Analysis of extrapolation cascadic multigrid method (EXCMG). Sci. China Ser. A-Math. 51, 1349–1360 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen, C.M., Shi, Z.C., Hu, H.L.: On extrapolation cascadic multigrid method. J. Comput. Math. 29, 684–697 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hu, H.L., Chen, C.M., Pan, K.J.: Asymptotic expansions of finite element solutions to Robin problems in \(H^3\) and their application in extrapolation cascadic multigrid method. Sci. China Math. 57, 687–698 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hu, H.L., Chen, C.M., Pan, K.J.: Time-extrapolation algorithm (TEA) for linear parabolic problems. J. Comput. Math. 32, 183–194 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pan, K.J., Tang, J.T., Hu, H.L., et al.: Extrapolation cascadic multigrid method for 2.5D direct current resistivity modeling (in Chinese), Chinese. J. Geophys. 55, 2769–2778 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pan, K.J., Tang, J.T.: 2.5-D and 3-D DC resistivity modelling using an extrapolation cascadic multigrid method. Geophys. J. Int. 197, 1459–1470 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Newman, G.A.: A Review of high-performance computational strategies for modeling and imaging of electromagnetic induction data. Surv. Geophys. 35, 85–100 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Berikelashuili, G., Gupta, M.M., Mirianashvili, M.: Convergence of fourth-order compact difference schemes for three-dimensional convection-diffusion equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45, 443–455 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pan, K.J., He, D.D., Hu, H.L.: A new extrapolation cascadic multigrid method for 3D elliptic boundary value problems on rectangular domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02983 (2015)
  45. 45.
    Marchuk, G.I., Shaidurov, V.V.: Difference Methods and Their Extrapolations. Springer, New York (1983)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Neittaanmaki, P., Lin, Q.: Acceleration of the convergence in finite-difference method by predictor corrector and splitting extrapolation methods. J. Comput. Math. 5, 181–190 (1987)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fößmeier, R.: On Richardson extrapolation for finite difference methods on regular grids. Numer. Math. 55, 451–462 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Han, G.Q.: Spline finite difference methods and their extrapolation for singular two-point boundary value problems. J. Comput. Math. 11, 289–296 (1993)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sun, H., Zhang, J.: A high order finite difference discretization strategy based on extrapolation for convection diffusion equations. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 20, 18–32 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rahul, K., Bhattacharyya, S.N.: One-sided finite-difference approximations suitable for use with Richardson extrapolation. J. Comput. Phys. 219, 13–20 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Munyakazi, J.B., Patidar, K.C.: On Richardson extrapolation for fitted operator finite difference methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 201, 465–480 (2008)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tam, C.K.W., Kurbatskii, K.A.: A wavenumber based extrapolation and interpolation method for use in conjunction with high-order finite difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 157, 588–617 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ma, Y., Ge, Y.: A high order finite difference method with Richardson extrapolation for 3D convection diffusion equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 215, 3408–3417 (2010)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Marchi, C.H., Novak, L.A., Santiago, C.D., et al.: Highly accurate numerical solutions with repeated Richardson extrapolation for 2D Laplace equation. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 7386–7397 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Collatz, L.: The Numerical Treatment of Differential Equations. Springer, New York (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematics and StatisticsCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied MechanicsTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Key Laboratory of High Performance Computing and Stochastic Information Processing (Ministry of Education of China)Hunan Normal UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations