Journal of Scientific Computing

, Volume 35, Issue 2–3, pp 192–218 | Cite as

Superposition of Multi-Valued Solutions in High Frequency Wave Dynamics



The weakly coupled WKB system captures high frequency wave dynamics in many applications. For such a system a level set method framework has been recently developed to compute multi-valued solutions to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and evaluate position density accordingly. In this paper we propose two approaches for computing multi-valued quantities related to density, momentum as well as energy. Within this level set framework we show that physical observables evaluated in Jin et al. (J. Comput. Phys. 210(2):497–518, [2005]; J. Comput. Phys. 205(1):222–241, [2005]) are simply the superposition of their multi-valued correspondents. A series of numerical tests is performed to compute multi-valued quantities and validate the established superposition properties.


Level set method WKB system Multi-valued solution Superposition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beyer, R.P., LeVeque, R.J.: Analysis of a one-dimensional model for the immersed boundary method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29(2), 332–364 (1992) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brenier, Y., Corrias, L.: A kinetic formulation for multi-branch entropy solutions of scalar conservation laws. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 15(2), 169–190 (1998) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng, L.-T.: An Efficient level set method for constructing wave fronts in three space dimensions. UCLA CAM Report (15) (2006) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng, L.-T., Liu, H., Osher, S.: Computational high-frequency wave propagation using the level set method, with applications to the semi-classical limit of Schrödinger equations. Commun. Math. Sci. 1(3), 593–621 (2003) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crandall, M.G., Lions, P.-L.: Viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 277(1), 1–42 (1983) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engquist, B., Runborg, O.: Multi-phase computations in geometrical optics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 74(1–2), 175–192 (1996). TICAM Symposium (Austin, TX, 1995) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engquist, B., Runborg, O.: Computational high frequency wave propagation. In: Acta Numerica, vol. 12, pp. 181–266. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engquist, B., Tornberg, A.-K., Tsai, R.: Discretization of Dirac delta functions in level set methods. J. Comput. Phys. 207(1), 28–51 (2005) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gosse, L.: Using K-branch entropy solutions for multivalued geometric optics computations. J. Comput. Phys. 180(1), 155–182 (2002) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gosse, L., Jin, S., Li, X.: Two moment systems for computing multiphase semiclassical limits of the Schrödinger equation. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 13(12), 1689–1723 (2003) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.-W., Tadmor, E.: Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43(1), 89–112 (2001) (electronic) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harten, A.: Preliminary results on the extension of ENO schemes to two-dimensional problems. In: Nonlinear Hyperbolic Problems, (St. Etienne, 1986). Lect. Notes in Math., vol. 1270, pp. 23–40. Springer, Berlin (1987) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harten, A.: ENO schemes with subcell resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 83(1), 148–184 (1989) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jin, S., Li, X.: Multi-phase computations of the semiclassical limit of the Schrödinger equation and related problems: Whitham vs. Wigner. Physica D 182(1–2), 46–85 (2003) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jin, S., Liu, H., Osher, S., Tsai, R.: Computing multi-valued physical observables for the high frequency limit of symmetric hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 210(2), 497–518 (2005) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin, S., Liu, H., Osher, S., Tsai, Y.-H.R.: Computing multivalued physical observables for the semiclassical limit of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Phys. 205(1), 222–241 (2005) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jin, S., Osher, S.: A level set method for the computation of multivalued solutions to quasi-linear hyperbolic PDEs and Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Commun. Math. Sci. 1(3), 575–591 (2003) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kružkov, S.N.: First order quasilinear equations with several independent variables. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 81(123), 228–255 (1970) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, H., Cheng, L.-T., Osher, S.: A level set framework for capturing multi-valued solutions to nonlinear first-order equations. J. Sci. Comput. 29(3), 353–373 (2006) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, H., Osher, S., Tsai, R.: Multi-valued solution and level set methods in computational high frequencywave propagation. Commun. Comput. Phys. 1(5), 765–804 (2006) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, H., Wang, Z.: Computing multi-valued velocity and electric fields for 1d Euler-Poisson equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 57(5–7), 821–836 (2007) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, H., Wang, Z.: A filed-space based level set method for computing mult-valued solutions to 1d Euler-Poisson equations. J. Comput. Phys. 225(1), 591–614 (2007) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Min, C.: Local level set method in high dimension and codimension. J. Comput. Phys. 200(1), 368–382 (2004) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osher, S., Cheng, L.-T., Kang, M., Shim, H., Tsai, Y.-H.: Geometric optics in a phase-space-based level set and Eulerian framework. J. Comput. Phys. 179(2), 622–648 (2002) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Osher, S., Shu, C.-W.: High-order essentially nonoscillatory schemes for Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28(4), 907–922 (1991) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peng, D., Merriman, B., Osher, S., Zhao, H., Kang, M.: A PDE-based fast local level set method. J. Comput. Phys. 155(2), 410–438 (1999) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Raviart, P.-A.: On the numerical analysis of particle simulations in plasma physics. In: Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications. Collège de France Seminar, vol. IV, Paris, 1981/1982. Res. Notes in Math., vol. 84, pp. 173–193. Pitman, Boston (1983) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shu, C.-W.: High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. In: High-Order Methods for Computational Physics. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, pp. 439–582. Springer, Berlin (1999) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shu, C.-W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77(2), 439–471 (1988) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shu, C.-W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes. II. J. Comput. Phys. 83(1), 32–78 (1989) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Towers, J.: Two methods for discretizing a delta function supported on a level set. J. Comput. Phys. 220(2), 915–931 (2007) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Whitham, G.B.: Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley, New York (1974). Pure Appl. Math. MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations