Journal of Scientific Computing

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 163–182 | Cite as

Stabilized Moving Finite Elements for Convection Dominated Problems

  • Keith Miller


The Moving Finite Element method (MFE) when applied to purely hyperbolic problems tends to move its nodes with the flow (often a good thing). But for steady or near steady problems the nodes flow past stationary regions of critical interest and pile up at the outflow. We report on efforts to develop moveable node versions of the “stabilized” finite element methods which have so successfully improved upon Galerkin in the fixed node setting. One method in particular (Galerkin-Δx TLSMFE with a “fix”) yields very promising results on our simple 1-D model problem. Its nodes lock onto and resolve sharp stationary features but also lock onto and move with the moving features of the solution.


Finite elements moving nodes moving finite elements stabilized finite elements partial differential equations convection advection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baines,  1994Moving Finite ElementsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brooks, A., Hughes, T.J.R. 1982Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulation for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equationsComput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.32199259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlson, N.N., Miller, K. 1998Design and application of a gradient-weighted moving finite element code I: in one dimensionSIAM J. Sci. Comput.19728765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlson, N.N., Miller, K. 1998Design and application of a gradient-weighted moving finite element code II: in two dimensionsSIAM J. Sci. Comput.19766798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franca, L.P., Hughes, T.J.R. 1993Convergence analysis of Galerkin/ least-squares methods for symmetric advective-diffusive forms of the Stokes and incompressible Navier–Stokes equationsComput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.105285298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes, T.J.R. 1995Multiscale phonomena: Green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann. formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles and the origins of stabilized methodsComput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.127387401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, K. 1981Moving finite elements IISIAM J. Numer. Anal.1810331057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller, K. 1997A geometrical-mechanical interpretation of gradient-weighted moving finite elementsSIAM J. Numer. Anal.346790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller K. (2005). Nonlinear Krylov and moving nodes in the Method of Lines. To appear in J. Comp. Appl. Math.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, K., Baines, M.J. 1998Least squares moving finite elementsOxford University Computing LaboratoryOxfordNumerical Analysis Report 98./06.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, K., Baines, M.J. 2001Least squares moving finite elementsIMA J. Numer. Anal.21621642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, K., Miller, R.N. 1981Moving finite elements ISIAM J. Numer. Anal.1810191032CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations