Views on the Form-Function Correlation and Biological Design

Abstract

The linkage between form and function is a fascinating field for intellectual analysis and contemplation in natural sciences by naturalists, biologists, anatomists, as well as philosophers and theologians. In the early nineteenth century, creationists’ approaches (Cuvier-Paley) helped to install the idea of a form-function binomial that gained scientific status in the second half of that century when it was contextualized within the framework of evolution by natural selection. In the mid-twentieth century, W.J. Bock and G. von Wahlert settled the modern basis for the elucidation of adaptation based on morphology, function, environment, and their interconnections. The paleontologist Leonard Burton Radinsky made significant contributions to the development of form-function studies. Also, his posthumously published book The Evolution of Vertebrate Design (1987), inspired many young biologists to embrace form-function approaches. Radinsky emphasized the importance of looking for the behaviors or functions that are actually correlated with a particular anatomical form in living species, together with a biomechanical design analysis as looking at that anatomical structure from a biomechanical or engineering perspective. Field biology research and testing form-function correlation should be a prerequisite in adaptation research programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Abzhanov A (2017) The old and new faces of morphology: the legacy of D'Arcy Thompson's ‘theory of transformations' and ‘laws of growth'. Development 144: 4284–4297

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander RMcN (1996) Optima for Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amador LI, Almeida FC, Giannini NP (2019) Evolution of traditional aerodynamic variables in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) within a comprehensive phylogenetic framework. J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  4. Ayala FJ (2007) Darwin’s greatest discovery: design without designer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 8567–8573

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bock WJ (2009) Design – an inappropriate concept in evolutionary theory. J Zool Syst Evol Res 47:7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock WJ, von Wahlert YG (1965) Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19:269–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnan MT (2016) The Bare Bones: An Unconventional Evolutionary History of the Skeleton. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  8. Capra F (2007) The Science of Leonardo: Inside the Mind of the Great Genius of the Renaissance. Doubleday, New York

  9. Carrizo LV, Tulli MJ, Abdala V (2019) Functional indices and postnatal ontogeny of long bones of the forelimb in the sigmodontine rodents (Rodentia: Cricetidae). J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  10. Cassini GH, Toledo N, Vizcaíno SF (2019) Form-function correlation paradigm in mammalogy. A tribute to Leonard B. Radinsky (1937–1985). J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  11. Darwin C (1872) 1903 Letter to Alpheus Hyatt. In: Darwin F, Seward AC (eds) More Letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 1, Letter 254. John Murray, London, pp 341–344

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dawkins R (1987) The Blind Watchmaker. Why the Evidence of Evolution reveals a Universe without Design. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson G (2016) Show Me the Bone. Reconstructing Prehistoric Monsters in Nineteenth-century Britain and America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  14. Gould SJ (1971) D'Arcy Thompson and the science of form. New Literary History 2: 229–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hopson JA (1989) Leonard Burton Radinsky (1937–1985). In: Prothero DR, Schoch RM (eds) The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hopson JA, Radinsky LB (1980) Vertebrate paleontology: new approaches and new insights. Paleobiology 6:250–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huneman P (2006) Naturalising purpose: from comparative anatomy to the ‘adventure of reason’. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 37:649–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kay RF (this volume) Leonard B. Radinsky (1937-1985), Radical Biologist. J Mammal Evol

  19. Lister AM (2014) Behavioural leads in evolution: evidence from the fossil record. Biol J Linn Soc 112:315–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marchesi MC, Dans SL, Mora MS, González-José R (2019) Allometry and ontongeny in the vertebral column of South American dolphins: a 3D approach. J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  21. Muñoz NA (2019) Locomotion in rodents and small carnivorans: are they so different? J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  22. Padian K (1995) Form and function: the evolution of a dialectic. In: Thomason JJ (ed) Functional Morphology and Vertebrate Paleontology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 264–277

  23. Plotnick R, Baumiller T (2000) Invention by evolution: functional analysis in paleobiology. In: Erwin DH, Wing SL (eds) Deep Time: Paleobiology’s Perspective. Supplement to vol. 26(4) of Paleobiology, pp 305–323

  24. Radinsky LB (1987) The Evolution of Vertebrate Design. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sánchez MS, Carrizo LV (2019) Interplay between forelimb morphology and foraging ecology in four families of Neotropical bats. J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  26. Schwenk K (2000) Feeding. Form, Function and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego

  27. Toledo N, Muñoz NA, Cassini GH (2019) Ulna of extant xenarthrans: shape, size and funtion. J Mammal Evol (this volume)

  28. Thompson DW (1917). On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  29. Vizcaíno SF, Bargo, MS, Cassini GH, Toledo N (2016) Forma y función en paleobiología de vertebrados. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata (EDULP) https://libros.unlp.edu.ar/index.php/unlp/catalog/book/612. Access 9/9/2019

  30. Vizcaíno SF, Fariña RA, Mazzetta G (1999) Ulnar dimensions and fossoriality in armadillos and other South American mammals. Acta Theriol 44:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vizcaíno SF, Manera T, Fernicola JC (2009) Viaje al sepulcro de los gigantes. Darwin y los mamíferos fósiles de América del Sur. Ciencia Hoy 19: 8–73

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weibel ER, Taylor CR, Bolis L (1998) Principles of Animal Design: The Optimization and Symmorphosis Debate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

To Guillermo Cassini and Néstor Toledo, organizers of the Symposium El paradigma de correlación forma-función en mastozoología: un tributo a Leonard Radinsky (1937–1985), held during the XXXI Jornadas Argentinas de Mastozoología (October 23-26, 2018) in La Rioja, Argentina. To G. Cassini, N. Toledo, and Richard Kay for fruitful discussions before and during the writing of this manuscript. To two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

Funding

This is a contribution funded by Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP 11/N867) and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2017–1081), Argentina.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio F. Vizcaíno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Comment on Ethics

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vizcaíno, S.F., Bargo, M.S. Views on the Form-Function Correlation and Biological Design. J Mammal Evol 28, 15–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-019-09487-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Radinsky
  • Morphology
  • Biomechanics
  • Adaptation
  • Mammals