Long or Heavy? Physiological Constraints in the Evolution of Antlers
- 365 Downloads
The evolution of the investment in exaggerated secondary sexual traits is a topic of great interest for scientists. Despite antlers in the family Cervidae being one of the most interesting allometric structures, the nature of the relationships between antler and body size, and the influence of physiological factors driving the evolution of these characters, still remain unclear. In this paper, I examine these relationships in depth using the largest sample size ever studied (43 species). Under the hypothesis that antler growth may be limited by skeleton size as this process requires the allocation of huge amounts of mineral resources to the antlers, skeleton-related variables may more accurately explain these allometric relationships. The existence of physiological constraints should therefore be more clearly highlighted when studying the relationships between body size variables and the relative investment in the antler (measured as length or mass of antler per kg of skeleton). Results show that antler length is best described as being linearly related to head-body length rather than other measurements of size, and antler weight has a quadratic relationship with body mass. However, the relative investment in antler length (related to skeleton mass) is independent of body size variables, while the relative investment in antler mass has a quadratic relationship with shoulder height. The results obtained for antler mass reflect the existence of physiological constraints in the evolution of antlers, which are greater for larger sized species. On the other hand, the evolution of antler length may be linked to other factors, most probably sociobiological and biomechanical ones.
KeywordsBody mass Deer Head-body length Physiological constraints Shoulder height Relative investment
The author thanks M. Komárková, J.L. Ros-Santaella, J. Pluhacek, L. Bartoš, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. This work has been funded by the projects MZERO0714 (Ministry of Agriculture), and IGA-20155013 (Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences - CULS).
- Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15Google Scholar
- Gould SJ (1973) Positive allometry of antlers in the “ Irish elk ”, Megaloceros giganteus. Nature 244:375–376Google Scholar
- Mattioli S (2011) Family Cervidae (deer). In: Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA (eds) Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Vol. 2. Hoofed Mammals. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 350–407Google Scholar
- Rabinowitz A, Myint T, Khaing ST, Rabinowitz S (1999) Description of the leaf deer (Muntiacus putaoensis), a new species of muntjac from northern Myanmar. J Zool 249:427–435Google Scholar
- Řežábek J, Bubenik AB (1963) The metabolism of phosphorus and iodine in deer. Translation Series AEC-tr-5631, U. S. Atomic Energy CommissionGoogle Scholar
- Wallace V, Davies AS (1985) Pre- and post-rut body composition of red deer stags. In: Fennessy PF, Drew KR (eds) Biology of Deer Production, Royal Society of New Zealand, Bulletin no. 22, Wellington, pp 291–293Google Scholar